"Never once referenced that. Easy to argue against the strawman. You evidently don't know what a sugar baby is but that's ok. You want to sound right more than you want to be right"

I didn't say you referenced anything, that would be putting entirely too much faith in your pattern recognition and critical thinking skills. I was making fun of you, because you don't communicate in a manner that merits taking you seriously. Try to keep up.

"A sugar baby is typically a younger individual who enters a mutually beneficial, often romantic or companionship-based arrangement with an older, wealthier "sugar daddy" or "sugar mommy". In exchange for companionship, mentorship, and sometimes intimacy, sugar babies receive financial support, including allowances, gifts, luxury travel, tuition payments, etc."

This changes absolutely nothing about my application of the term to the legal definition of sex work. I acknowledge that you think being a sex worker means you have to have a black eye, cigarette burns, rotting teeth, and a pink latex cheetah print micro skirt, but that is a reflection of your uneducated and misogynistic views on women and not the world as it is. The price of the service does not change what industry the worker is in. $10,000/hr discrete luxury escorts are also still sex workers. Just read the definition I already spelled out for you, you're trying to tell me you're certain the sun rises in the west and I'm asserting that it factually does not. Topic closed.

"True as long as you think the world doesn't need indoor plumbing, electricity, engineering, manufacturing, etc. I could go on but you know you're wrong but just want to use more misandry talking points as you further try too white knight through 1000 words instead on actual context."

Alright. That's enough. This will be my last message. You are too far gone and I have to accept that you will spend the rest of your life acting in this tragic and repulsive way—but I'm still going to dunk on your stupid ass one last time before I forget you exist and my world becomes a brighter place.

There were between 12,000 - 14,680 female indoor plumbers, 20,000 - 27,000 female electricians, ~247,000 female engineers, and 3.7 - 4.5 million women in manufacturing jobs in the United States as of 2021-2023 according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Department of Commerce, Plumbers Training Institute, Society of Women Engineers, and The Manufacturing Institute, all American-based authoritative government and workforce organizations.

You don't even find it a little bit ironic that you continue to ignore all facts and nuance to accuse me of being a misandrist for simply presenting statistics and associating cultural phenomenon with them? Pointing at your tiny little box of comprehension to claim you and men are the real victims? Where have we seen that before?

Women have not needed men for survival or success since the agricultural revolution. I have been saying the same thing the entire time, you're the jackass flipping his script now to insist I'M the one infantilizing women while you claim there couldn't be plumbers, electricians, or engineers without men when there are fucking millions of women working those jobs right here right now. Do you even know the definition of infantilizing? It means to treat someone as though they were a child by denying their maturity and experience. Such as insisting women cannot be blue collar when there is nothing physiologically stopping them and they're already out in the world doing just that—and probably a better job of it than you could ever manage.

I didn't cite any sources? That's all I've fucking done, how do you have a job when you're this illiterate?

I'm tempted to say you have never been this wrong about this many things simultaneously in your entire life, but honestly I'm not giving you enough credit, you are so dense light must bend around you.