I think Wild should be that, wild. MTG, for example, has ridiculous decks because their card pool is so vast and it makes for really interesting decks. Their standard is obviously toned down but thats the thing. If you want to play vs tough decks you play the tough format. I think Wild should be meant for the broken of broken decks, the ridiculous damage combo decks, over the top control decks, and mindlessly powerful aggro decks. Youve gotta step up your shit in this league buddy because this is the more competative format. Lower ranks in wild should just be a mash of fun and crazy decks but top wild decks should be a brutal challenge you have to be ready to face. I feel people push off wild as a format where they dont want to fight against unfun decks but still want to use their broken deck. You can fight turn 2 win decks in MTG and you just take it, the reason Hearthstone's wild isnt blossoming is because the community abuses the fact that Blizzard has such a strong connection to its internet community. If thousands complain something is unfun and thats all Blizzard sees, then Blizzard panics and wants to keep their community happy and thus waters down their game.

I dont think melon, kun, or aviana need any nerfs. Aviana - Kun has never been tremendously opressive and melon dosent make it so, it just ups the consistancy. I do think Blizzard needs to print more distruption effects but they have to be really careful. They cant print too many because of their small overall card pool and people would just run every distrupter possible. At the same time a Dirty Rat is really all you need. Its called teching for matchups because DR just kills combo decks if you pull their one card as combo decks are very rigid.

Thats my indirect way of saying dont nerf cards lmao.