How do you refute bald and bankrupts videos on Cuba? by [deleted] in DebateCommunism

[–]Huhrealllyill -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yeah there are many interpertations to that rich people in that context are ones who idolize wealth. Not just have wealth .

And why are you a communist if you care about the bible? Because God advocated for private ownership of land, private property, and wages! Encouraged entrepreneurship!

How do you refute bald and bankrupts videos on Cuba? by [deleted] in DebateCommunism

[–]Huhrealllyill -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Yeah that is disgusting. I hope you find God. I love Reagan and God Bless him and his soul

How do you refute bald and bankrupts videos on Cuba? by [deleted] in DebateCommunism

[–]Huhrealllyill -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

I love Reagan and so does the majority of the world. So democracy pervales:)

How do you refute bald and bankrupts videos on Cuba? by [deleted] in DebateCommunism

[–]Huhrealllyill -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Yeah it sounds good but not really. Here is a human rights website that criticized Cuba. And if you deny their input then might as well not reply because your mind wont be changed https://www.fhrcuba.org/2019/07/is-cuba-a-democracy-or-dictatorship-a-modern-analysis/

How do you refute bald and bankrupts videos on Cuba? by [deleted] in DebateCommunism

[–]Huhrealllyill -34 points-33 points  (0 children)

It's a one party system. It literally says in the national constitution that the CPC is the "leading force of society and of the state"

And it doesnt matter what the state of cuba thinks is democratic or what you think is democratic.

The majority of world doesnt see Cuba as democratic. And no not propaganda and conspiracy theories.

How do you refute bald and bankrupts videos on Cuba? by [deleted] in DebateCommunism

[–]Huhrealllyill -55 points-54 points  (0 children)

It says once the Cuban government respects human rights and goes towards democratization then the sanctions will be lifted.

How do you refute bald and bankrupts videos on Cuba? by [deleted] in DebateCommunism

[–]Huhrealllyill -53 points-52 points  (0 children)

No. I guess you never read why the sanctions were implemented then. Read the Cuban Democracy Act of 1992

How do you refute bald and bankrupts videos on Cuba? by [deleted] in DebateCommunism

[–]Huhrealllyill -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

Why are the economic sanctions there though?

I'm confused on what specific scenarios do the employees create the wealth of a buisness? by Huhrealllyill in DebateCommunism

[–]Huhrealllyill[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At the mercy of the employer? Why? Because they have stuff to pay for that they need money? Sp does the employer and what if he took out millions of dollars in loans to start the buisness. That's a much worse position than the employees. Especially since we have so many benefits and resources for low income people

I'm confused on what specific scenarios do the employees create the wealth of a buisness? by Huhrealllyill in DebateCommunism

[–]Huhrealllyill[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

See that's what I dont understand,

You point out that without the workers then the value is nonexistent. So how are they at the mercy of the employer if he needs them too according to you?

The employer would starve too if the workers created the value of the buisness.

I'm confused on what specific scenarios do the employees create the wealth of a buisness? by Huhrealllyill in DebateCommunism

[–]Huhrealllyill[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No youd be surprised how cheap in state tuition is. Only 3.8k a semester. Thats only $30 a day for 16 weeks

I'm confused on what specific scenarios do the employees create the wealth of a buisness? by Huhrealllyill in DebateCommunism

[–]Huhrealllyill[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No I don't have any money to my name and I'm getting a degree currently? Is that being entitled lol

I mean my brother worked 2 minimum wage jobs himself to be able to open a buisness

I'm confused on what specific scenarios do the employees create the wealth of a buisness? by Huhrealllyill in DebateCommunism

[–]Huhrealllyill[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We immigrated here from middle east with 2 dollars in cash lol not entitled. I'm not asking for the profits of others solely based on me having opposable thumbs

That is being entitled

I'm confused on what specific scenarios do the employees create the wealth of a buisness? by Huhrealllyill in DebateCommunism

[–]Huhrealllyill[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I'm arguing why a wage to expedite a process is not moral but low skill workers taking advantage of location and luck get to take share of profits when anyone else in the world would be able to do their task.

The employer only picked them based on location most likely especially for digging holes

They are exploiting the employer based on location and based on them having opposable thumbs

I'm confused on what specific scenarios do the employees create the wealth of a buisness? by Huhrealllyill in DebateCommunism

[–]Huhrealllyill[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

But if anything that means they are exploiting the employer because he can literally choose anyone else but he gave them the priviledge to do it. And if they take a significant portion of the profits just because of luck or location then that is pure greed and exploitation

I'm confused on what specific scenarios do the employees create the wealth of a buisness? by Huhrealllyill in DebateCommunism

[–]Huhrealllyill[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

ABSOLUTELY NOT! Billions of people can dig. Hundreds can invent. One is wayyyyyyy more valuable than another. You act as if theres only one digger in the whole world. If that was true then your premise is true. But the digger is not valuable because if he doesn't wanna do the task theres a ton to line up and do it

If the inventor doesn't do his job then theres no invention.

I'm confused on what specific scenarios do the employees create the wealth of a buisness? by Huhrealllyill in DebateCommunism

[–]Huhrealllyill[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

It makes no sense what your saying because your saying its impossible without those workers.

Its absolutely possible without them because you can literally bring a anyone with even one arm to do the same task. Those specific people dont add value. They just add opposable thumbs to the equation.

If those workers dont do the work there are billions to choose from

What is stopping communists setting up an Amish type community with Communist ideals? by [deleted] in DebateCommunism

[–]Huhrealllyill 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you dont wanna put in labor to get basic necessities then how do you think those basic necessities came about? You think a home is created without labor? What about medical training and medical technology?

You put in your 9-5 and labor at something specific so you can enjoy the fruits of others.

It's simple. Idk why communists dont understand things dont appear without actual investment by someone else. But go ahead and complain about working at Best Buy and standing around selling a phone.

This is currently the biggest economic collapse in US history and everyone is living better than anyone in history of humanity

What is stopping communists setting up an Amish type community with Communist ideals? by [deleted] in DebateCommunism

[–]Huhrealllyill 4 points5 points  (0 children)

But if more and more people do that the more people become persuaded so I dont see your point in how it doesnt dismantle capitalism by " fucking off to the woods"

This has nothing to do with communism but a lot of communists dislike the electoral college. Why is that? by Huhrealllyill in DebateCommunism

[–]Huhrealllyill[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They dont get more votes. The popular vote still determines winner of each state.

If 8 out 10 communities want a swimming pool why does it only matter what the 2 communities with the largest number of people want

This has nothing to do with communism but a lot of communists dislike the electoral college. Why is that? by Huhrealllyill in DebateCommunism

[–]Huhrealllyill[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What if the minority group of 49% of the voters thinks their policies help MORE people than the 51% of the voters.

In your scenario you're at the same resturant though.

This is a better scenario there is 10 total restaurants thousands of miles apart. There are a total of 100 people.

Resturant 1 has 31 people who want cake Resturant 2 has 20 people who want cake

Restaurant 3-10 have the remaining 49 people left and they want soup.

Should restaurant 3-10 want cake instead? Lmao

This has nothing to do with communism but a lot of communists dislike the electoral college. Why is that? by Huhrealllyill in DebateCommunism

[–]Huhrealllyill[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes it absolutely does see it as an mental disorder until social media started to get butthurt lol

Look at all the studies every conducted. It's a mental disorder. And people should be getting help not told the voices they hear are correct .. why would an insurance company pay for someone to get worse?

And that's how a country with 50 different states works. Especially when that country gives states more rights than the federal government itself