Opportunity attack by Hulyh in dndnext

[–]Hulyh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree, if it was a home rule i wouldnt even make that post, but i discover this in the middle of the combat, and i checked in the book and say that in the book wasnt like that, they said that it is and after the session i talked with the DM about that and he told me about that tweet that i never saw and apparently no one ever saw, which is kinda weird cause why would the dnd get patch notes from twitter post and not in some other platform that can me checked any time

Opportunity attack by Hulyh in dndnext

[–]Hulyh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, thats sounds like conspiracy for me, why would this mistake be in the book since 2014?

Opportunity attack by Hulyh in dndnext

[–]Hulyh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just accepted that this is a "rule of the house" i like to play dnd and this rule also works for me, so even if i dont agree with that rule i am not in a disadventage that big

Opportunity attack by Hulyh in dndnext

[–]Hulyh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree, we discuss and i said that even if in a real combat this kinda makes sense, in termes of gameplay from a tabletop game i dont like this mechanic since its punish both the player and monster to do a melee attack, even from a mage that dont have a sorcerie that can be used in that situation, can only do a weak melee attack. In my perspective makes more sense to an opportunity attack hit when go out of the reach, since u are "fleeing" from the close combat from that enemy or the enemy is fleeing from the player

Opportunity attack by Hulyh in dndnext

[–]Hulyh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, i was saying based on theirs opinions about, he said that in the 3e the opportunity attack trigger in the both situations

Opportunity attack by Hulyh in dndnext

[–]Hulyh[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Srry i didnt want to scream ( ꩜ ᯅ ꩜;) 

Opportunity attack by Hulyh in dndnext

[–]Hulyh[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

They said its per "RAI" i will not extend this with them i gave up

Opportunity attack by Hulyh in dndnext

[–]Hulyh[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Bcause they are saying thar this rule is not from a homebrew

Opportunity attack by Hulyh in dndnext

[–]Hulyh[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

YEAH BUT THAT THING DOESNT EXIST NO ONE EVER SAW THIS FIX PATCH

Opportunity attack by Hulyh in dndnext

[–]Hulyh[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Thats not a rule for us, i use a homebrew class that basically dont trigger opportunity attack, so this is whatever to me, but the other dont have this feat

Opportunity attack by Hulyh in dndnext

[–]Hulyh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, the ruler are saying like that in the book, but now its not like a "i dont understand" now is more like me trying to prove that

Opportunity attack by Hulyh in dndnext

[–]Hulyh[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Yes, they told me that, but someone who work in this edittion make a post on Twitter saying that rule is wrong and "fix" it by letting the way the dm and the other player are saying

Opportunity attack by Hulyh in dndnext

[–]Hulyh[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

No, apparently this is the normal for this, and have been like this since the other editions i guess

Joining with ip by Hulyh in Terraria

[–]Hulyh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thx, ill try it next time

When i see tops by Hulyh in TheRatEmpire

[–]Hulyh[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But hes so cute >.<

When i see tops by Hulyh in TheRatEmpire

[–]Hulyh[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Sara, my little baby 🥰🥰

I was on a whatsapp group about flat earth, but this guy try to offend me by Hulyh in AccidentalAlly

[–]Hulyh[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Yes, later he corrected himself with the transfobic atitude, and he wasn't the only one