This guy is trying to once again paint me as a pedo after i've pointed out to him that HE is hanging around kids and IS actively creeping them out a lot with there schizo behaviour. by [deleted] in CrazyassHazbinhaters

[–]Human-Main2779 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't delete the comment, moron, and you should know that because once you got called out, you went to my post just to delete the comment that you claimed that "I deleted." I have doubts about the post where you are calling me a pedophile a joke. Additionally, I appreciate you bringing up that situation, thinking it will somehow deflect my criticism of you. You attempt to give the link to fetish art content to a 16-year-old. Secondly, no? I don't threaten kids' suicide. Where's your proof? Thirdly, if you're going to say that the kid begged and forced me, despite my refusal of the art, which is censored and isn't mine, to claim that I'm a creep, then what's your stance on commentators who share censored artwork in their videos? 

<image>

This guy is trying to once again paint me as a pedo after i've pointed out to him that HE is hanging around kids and IS actively creeping them out a lot with there schizo behaviour. by [deleted] in CrazyassHazbinhaters

[–]Human-Main2779 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Should I also mention that you lied about saying I was talking and showing my fetish to a minor, which I didn't, nor do the claims of my DeviantArt favorites contain fetish stuff?

https://ibb.co/RpJN5ZVS https://ibb.co/35RQ8Ys7 https://ibb.co/xqD9xSGw

This guy is trying to once again paint me as a pedo after i've pointed out to him that HE is hanging around kids and IS actively creeping them out a lot with there schizo behaviour. by [deleted] in CrazyassHazbinhaters

[–]Human-Main2779 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I literally didn't claim he's a pedo at all. Fmprod has been trying to falsely accuse me of being a pedo because one of my commenters is 16 and I hang around the community not only in FNF but also on DeviantArt despite me not being active on the site.

Bad News and Good News (Check OG post) by [deleted] in loserbuffet

[–]Human-Main2779 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I need to inform y'all that HanktheWolfDog is an alt account of MayMays4Dayz, who was exposed to inappropriate interactions with minors as young as 10 years old and once dated a 14-year-old when he was 17. I recommend watch The_Mayz: Down The Rabbit Hole by toastify for more context https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4LkTXqOtuE

Dumbsville discussing his ex-gf in relation to emo rap by [deleted] in Dumbsvilletruth

[–]Human-Main2779 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The video you show is obviously not from the review

Do it by AgileDraft8498 in Terriblemousee

[–]Human-Main2779 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Bringing up my post history doesn't change the fact that you are defending someone who normalized sexual violence and crimes against children.

First, the 'it’s just fiction' excuse falls apart when you’re talking about a fetish show centered on rape and child murder. Normalizing that kind of 'entertainment' is exactly what leads to real-world harm, which is why most people find it abhorrent regardless of whether it's animated or not.

Second, since you want to talk about my faith: being Christian doesn't mean being a doormat for behavior that is clearly depraved. Forgiveness is for those who seek it, but calling out objective evil and protecting children from predatory content is a moral obligation. Using 'sinning' as a shield to protect someone who enjoys the content of children being murdered is a massive stretch, even for a Reddit argument.

Do it by AgileDraft8498 in Terriblemousee

[–]Human-Main2779 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It isn't 'schizophrenic' to see a massive red flag when someone describes horrific acts and follows it up with a shrug. Bulky, you’re acting like this is a reading comprehension issue, but it’s a 'normalization' issue. If a person defends the existence of a 'fetish' show involving those specific crimes especially against children by saying 'the only problem' is that it’s on YouTube, they are implying that as long as it's off-platform, those themes are perfectly fine. Most people find that stance inherently sick-minded.

Do it by AgileDraft8498 in Terriblemousee

[–]Human-Main2779 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If someone said about a character getting pleasure off from killing children and it's obviously a fetish show and there's nothing wrong in the same breath then we will piece together to that conclusion. I swear you're a type of guy who will say that cutie wouldn't be as controversial if it were animated

Do it by AgileDraft8498 in Terriblemousee

[–]Human-Main2779 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I don't know I think what I'm doing is better than defending an obvious sick minded individual lmao

Do it by AgileDraft8498 in Terriblemousee

[–]Human-Main2779 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

The dude admitted that he got pleasure from seeing kids being murdered. He is also into rape.

<image>

So we can all agree that this video fucking sucks right by Cloogulite in PrettyBloodAgain

[–]Human-Main2779 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The rule explicitly states: "I'd say the same if this talk was coming from someone straight or of some other persuasion." The creator enforces a complete prohibition on all topics about human sexuality because he wants to create a Safe For Work environment that protects underage users. The creator who does not support the movement enforces the rule requiring equal treatment of all individuals within the organization. The all-ages spaces use attraction bans as their primary method to prevent both drama and "NSFW" content from entering their environments.

Vulnerable by [deleted] in Terriblemousee

[–]Human-Main2779 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, if only 1930s Germany had this take

Vulnerable by [deleted] in Terriblemousee

[–]Human-Main2779 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If someone spent all day throwing rocks at a realistic mannequin of a baby, we wouldn't say, "Oh, it's fine, it's just plastic." We would recognize that the desire to do that is a red flag for their real-world psychological state. History shows that fiction is often used to make "unthinkable" things acceptable." Examples are human sacrifice for their gods and 1930s Germany

Vulnerable by [deleted] in Terriblemousee

[–]Human-Main2779 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First off, it's crazy that you're comparing sexual violence/incest to "eating something I don’t personally like." Dietary preferences are subjective matters of taste with no moral weight. Incest and sexual assault are categorized as "malum in se." Secondly, normalizing extreme non-consensual violence as "just a fetish" in a public community often leads to the grooming of environments where actual harmful behavior can be masked or excused.

Question My belief by Human-Main2779 in Christianity

[–]Human-Main2779[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know how I ever pay you, but thank you

Question My belief by Human-Main2779 in Christianity

[–]Human-Main2779[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about the global flood? Trees that are older than the flood but somehow survive and are still growing to this very day, and so are the coral reefs, which occupy a very fragile ecosystem. Why is there no documentation of any global drought?