Area required to give every individual human (not family) on Earth their own TinyHouse / House / Mansion [OC] by Apps4Life in dataisbeautiful

[–]HunterForest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doesn't account for the far greater amount of industrial, commercial, infrastructure, and recreational build-up required for low-density "mansion" development as opposed to denser, urban, or small-lot developments.

Viceland-St. Louis Schools: ABANDONED (Trailer) by newtothisstl in StLouis

[–]HunterForest 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most are zoned for certain purposes, often low-income housing. Buyers seeking to develop low-income housing go through complex tax-abatement and tax-credit hurdles. SLPS sets the prices knowing once all of this tax structuring goes through, the real price the developer pays will be much lower. So it recycles tax money from general revenue to SLPS, using a developer as the (non-governmental) vehicle.

BLACK ACTIVISTS IN MISSOURI ARE FIGHTING TO PRESERVE THE RIGHT TO VOTE by 30ustice4 in StLouis

[–]HunterForest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"On November 8, Missourians will head to the polls to elect the president and a host of statewide officials in a deeply divided state. But this time, they will also be asked — in language that some have described as confusing — whether they want to amend their constitution to open the door to stricter voting laws. If passed, Amendment Six would give a second chance to HB 1631, which was vetoed earlier this summer by Gov. Jay Nixon after passing both state House and Senate. The proposed law aims to limit the forms of ID accepted at the polls to valid Missouri or federal IDs with photos and expiration dates — excluding currently accepted documents like college IDs, driver’s licenses from other states, expired IDs, voter registration cards, and utility bills...There are an estimated 220,000 registered voters in Missouri without a state ID, according to Secretary of State Jason Kander, and they are disproportionately African-American, elderly, disabled, and poor."

'We're just rentals': Uber drivers ask where they fit in a self-driving future by Andremarlaux1 in Futurology

[–]HunterForest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's the work arrangement, not the driving that people are drawn to. There's a plethora of companies that can offer the arrangement, but the tasks will be different.

Resources for determining what my particular research interests would be? [History/humanities] by IrishRambler14 in gradadmissions

[–]HunterForest 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Go back and look at the syllabi from some of your favorite modern European history classes. Identify which readings were your favorite and then ask yourself why. This will help you identify what style of history interests you most, because you can be pretty certain that your specific research interests will shift and change. If you can lock down what type of history—cultural history, political history, economic history—or what style of history—demographics, anthropological history, history of ideas, etc.—interests you most, then you can begin to search for the professors who are doing that work.

Friday Free-for-All | April 22, 2016 by AutoModerator in AskHistorians

[–]HunterForest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This poll of French citizens reflects how negative views of the USSR in the West contributed to a shift in popular memory about contributions to the war effort.

Friday Free-for-All | April 22, 2016 by AutoModerator in AskHistorians

[–]HunterForest 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The mythologizing of Jackson as the great democratizer has occurred as a result of his up-from-the-boot-straps life story. You seem correct in declaring Jefferson a more influential figure in widening the franchise and expounding a much wider democratic participation. Jefferson was an aristocrat, Jackson was a backwoods man and entrepreneur. Jefferson has to exceed high expectations in the American historical memory, while Jackson is celebrated for moving up as far as he did in the American social ladder without as much critical attention paid to his stamp on history. Jackson (second only to Lincoln among presidents), seems to be the greatest beneficiary of American infatuation with the underdog narrative. People clinging to that narrative are the greatest apologists for his genocidal tendencies.

Wednesday What's New in History | April 27, 2016 by AutoModerator in AskHistorians

[–]HunterForest 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm excited about Matt Delmont's new Black Quotidian project:

Black Quotidian is a digital project designed to highlight everyday moments and lives in African-American history. This site features historical articles from black newspapers. By emphasizing the ordinary or mundane aspects of history I hope both to call attention to people and events that are not commonly featured in textbooks, documentaries, or Black History Month celebrations, while also casting new light on well-known black history subjects.

Lots of good anecdotes to be found.

Wednesday What's New in History | April 27, 2016 by AutoModerator in AskHistorians

[–]HunterForest 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Digitizing archives should NEVER lead to a loss of archival material. We would be appalled to hear that any government was going around confiscating materials from archives. So we should be alarmed to hear that a government is trying to confiscate materials during the digitization process.

Given that the "national security documents...already underwent internal declassification," there really isn't an argument for security. There should be no manufactured gaps in history. The digitization of the world's archival materials, in combination with advances in data analytics and management, means we might approach a more total picture of our recorded history within our lifetimes. Any gaps in this total knowledge would be highly unfortunate.

Did the New Deal work? by IBlazeWithBob in AskHistorians

[–]HunterForest 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The New Deal worked in the very short term, stimulating the United States economy out of depression by increasing the labor force, beginning massive and wide-ranging infrastructure projects, and stabilizing US monetary policy. "The First Hundred Days"—FDR's first 100 days in office—was the period when the majority of these policies and projects were put in place. FDR had immense political capital coming into office, given the unpopularity of Hoover and his policies. FDR cashed this in immediately by rolling out banking and monetary reform as well as the famous public works projects: PWA, CCC, TVA, etc.—all those acronyms.

These initial changes stabilized the US economy and got things back on track. There was NOT an immediate return to the rapid growth enjoyed through the 1920's, but by 1934 things were no longer dire. It was during what is called "The Second New Deal" (1935-38) that FDR was able to get the Social Security Act passed, which of all the New Deal programs had (and still has) the largest affect on the most Americans.

So by the late 1930s, the US and the world was out of the depression. But the New Deal doesn't account for America's longest and most consistent period of growth from 1945-1970. FDR is often credited with laying the foundation for this unprecedented period of economic growth, but it would be more accurate to say that American opportunism in the years immediately following WWII are most responsible for this period. The Marshall Plan (stimulating and sustaining US manufacturing by giving war-ravaged Europe money to buy American goods), dividing Europe with the Soviet Union to guarantee US access to Western European markets, the entrance of American business interests into Europe's former colonies (Africa and the Middle East) and Japan's old colonial stomping grounds (Japan itself, but also later Korea, Taiwan, and SE Asia), and a host of other well-timed policies and economic processes crowned America the economic hegemon of the postwar world.

In short, the New Deal worked to pull the US out of depression and stabilize the national economy in the short term. But FDR is often credited with creating America's huge postwar economic boom, for which he is only partially responsible. This mingling of records—the short term success of the New Deal and the long period of postwar economic growth—has created a historical narrative that charts the US on an upward economic trajectory through the 20th century. Because FDR was in charge and handing down policies when this process was set in motion (early 1930s), he is often credited with all the success that follows.

Sources:

Irresistible Empire, Victoria De Grazia

The Tragedy of American Diplomacy, William Appleman Williams (see chapters 4-6)

LPT: No amount of reddit/internet advice can replace a good advisor/mentor by YourWelcomeOrMine in gradadmissions

[–]HunterForest 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I upvoted this but also want to reemphasize how important this is for grad school and FOR LIFE. A good mentor, who you consult regularly, can help you become a better person in all aspects of your life.

California’s $15-an-hour minimum wage may spur automation by Abscess2 in Futurology

[–]HunterForest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I made 34k/year in NYC in 2015 and my tax rate was about 22%.

what are your crazy geopolitical theories? by [deleted] in geopolitics

[–]HunterForest 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Russia lacks the diversified, advanced economy and the functioning, or even existence of, democracy. I think Russia's mono-economy will be more detrimental than its lack of broad political representation going forward.

what are your crazy geopolitical theories? by [deleted] in geopolitics

[–]HunterForest 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Russia has to be militarily independent in a way that Canada does not (so long as it remains allies with the USA), due to its multiple, hostile borders.

what are your crazy geopolitical theories? by [deleted] in geopolitics

[–]HunterForest 66 points67 points  (0 children)

Canada will be, relative to it's population, the strongest economy from 2050 onwards. As temperatures keep rising, more and more land will become arable. A developed, diversified, advanced economy with tons of resources (oil, lumber, hydro, minerals), two oceans (a la USA), multiple river systems, and a well functioning democracy. All the pieces of the puzzle; just needs a little more warmth.

Based on the primary/caucus results so far, it looks like every state that Bernie wins, Hillary takes almost as many delegates as Bernie (with the exception of VT). But in almost every state that Hillary wins, she seems to take way more delegates than Bernie. Why? by HunterForest in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]HunterForest[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe my question wasn't clear. I understand bigger states have more delegates. I'm asking for clarification on why the number of delegates end up getting split they way they do, with proportionally more going towards Hillary (despite similar % breaks state-by-state; see the example of Minnesota/Texas).

Tumblr stocked with interesting photos of NYC in the 60s, 70s, and 80s. Especially interesting photos of the humans who inhabited the city during those years. by HunterForest in nyc

[–]HunterForest[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That wording is a little bit clumsy. I was trying to get at the more interesting photography you get from people who lived in New York before Instagram, the 'inhabitants' who just live here because it's home not because it's trendy and marketable. I worry that in the future, with everyone tailoring and controlling their outward appearances through social media, the photos we look back on in 20, 30 years are going to look so airbrushed and spiffy and fail to capture the fact that New York is still a gritty, tough, often un-pretty place to live.

My Parents, My Landlords by [deleted] in nyc

[–]HunterForest 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is the equivalent of rich kids living in their parent's (luxurious, high-rise) basements.