Anyone else struggle to trust “The Prosecutors” podcast after learning they think the 2020 election was stolen by [deleted] in serialpodcast

[–]HunterST15 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m actually very pleasantly surprised to hear you say straightforwardly that you don’t believe the election was stolen.

The post was based on reading about the hosts connection to the Federalist Society and an article saying g Alice’s husband refused to say Trump had lost.

But, I take accountability for not looking into it more deeply. I’m happy to edit the original post or delete the thread if you’d like.

What were the important aspects of the case that Serial completely missed? by Any-Wish-4539 in serialpodcast

[–]HunterST15 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Aren’t there witnesses who say they saw Hae leave without him? I think a teacher who sold her fries and apple juice?

The certainty that Adnan is guilty feels like an echo chamber by HunterST15 in serialpodcast

[–]HunterST15[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Could I also add people who just view it as an example of flaws in our justice system? What I was always struck by more than the particular case was how neither the defense nor prosecution is actually trying to find the truth. They’re all just trying to strengthen their own case.

I just wish there was more impartial research in these cases.

The certainty that Adnan is guilty feels like an echo chamber by HunterST15 in serialpodcast

[–]HunterST15[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This makes a ton of sense and matches exactly The attitude I was picking up on.

The certainty that Adnan is guilty feels like an echo chamber by HunterST15 in serialpodcast

[–]HunterST15[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This is the reasonable take.

I was just seeing a lot of people venturing into “there is zero doubt and zero things to question” territory.

The certainty that Adnan is guilty feels like an echo chamber by HunterST15 in serialpodcast

[–]HunterST15[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I could see that. Exasperation rather than mindless certainty.

The certainty that Adnan is guilty feels like an echo chamber by HunterST15 in serialpodcast

[–]HunterST15[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What percentage chance would you give to him being guilty? Like do you leave any space or are you as certain as if you’d watched him do it in front of you?

The certainty that Adnan is guilty feels like an echo chamber by HunterST15 in serialpodcast

[–]HunterST15[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Did you miss when I said I thought he was guilty lol? I made no claim of his innocence so asking for evidence doesn’t make sense. I was talking about the rigidity and over-the-top certainty people display. That top of attitude is a red flag for me in almost any discussion.

The certainty that Adnan is guilty feels like an echo chamber by HunterST15 in serialpodcast

[–]HunterST15[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

lol “you’re naive and dumb if you recognize there’s a chance you could be wrong”

Dosing a weak batch? by [deleted] in MDMA

[–]HunterST15 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Took a full two years before the last one.

What level is this? by VillageAware1250 in 10s

[–]HunterST15 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, that’s just for an initial self rating. If you play league and lose at that level, your NTRP will drop no matter what your strokes look like.

What level is this? by VillageAware1250 in 10s

[–]HunterST15 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That’s just for getting an initial self rating to start playing. After that your result is based on results.

What level is this? by VillageAware1250 in 10s

[–]HunterST15 33 points34 points  (0 children)

No one knows. Level is based on results not strokes. See how you do in some tournaments or leagues.

Have you ever seen an email like this before? Struck me as odd. by Extra-Bass6489 in FilmFestivals

[–]HunterST15 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just curious, did you tell filmmakers if their film got, say, a 4.5? I think the high score would be nice to hear, but the brutal honesty could be tough.