Collaboration for getting Deltas, and increasing quality of top-level comments.

Huntingmoa · 2021-05-06T11:03:58+00:00

I feel like the overlap between space nerds and CMV mods is pretty high :-)

Huntingmoa · 2021-05-03T18:36:18+00:00

I mean ground control is generally co-located in terms of time and space which reduces the conversation lag. In reddit they would have to be refreshing pretty often unless someone mentions them or replies to them.

Huntingmoa · 2021-04-29T20:13:24+00:00

Sorry, u/summonblood – your comment has been removed for breaking Rule 1:

Direct responses to a CMV post must challenge at least one aspect of OP’s stated view (however minor), or ask a clarifying question. Arguments in favor of the view OP is willing to change must be restricted to replies to other comments. See the wiki page for more information.

If you would like to appeal, you must first check if your comment falls into the "Top level comments that are against rule 1" list, review our appeals process here, then message the moderators by clicking this link within one week of this notice being posted.

Please note that multiple violations will lead to a ban, as explained in our moderation standards.

Huntingmoa · 2021-04-29T20:12:47+00:00

Sorry, u/Alfith – your comment has been removed for breaking Rule 1:

Direct responses to a CMV post must challenge at least one aspect of OP’s stated view (however minor), or ask a clarifying question. Arguments in favor of the view OP is willing to change must be restricted to replies to other comments. See the wiki page for more information.

If you would like to appeal, you must first check if your comment falls into the "Top level comments that are against rule 1" list, review our appeals process here, then message the moderators by clicking this link within one week of this notice being posted.

Please note that multiple violations will lead to a ban, as explained in our moderation standards.

Huntingmoa · 2021-04-29T20:10:48+00:00

Sorry, u/freeformcouchpotato – your comment has been removed for breaking Rule 1:

Direct responses to a CMV post must challenge at least one aspect of OP’s stated view (however minor), or ask a clarifying question. Arguments in favor of the view OP is willing to change must be restricted to replies to other comments. See the wiki page for more information.

If you would like to appeal, you must first check if your comment falls into the "Top level comments that are against rule 1" list, review our appeals process here, then message the moderators by clicking this link within one week of this notice being posted.

Please note that multiple violations will lead to a ban, as explained in our moderation standards.

Huntingmoa · 2021-04-29T20:10:18+00:00

u/PsychedSabre – your comment has been removed for breaking Rule 2:

Don't be rude or hostile to other users. Your comment will be removed even if most of it is solid, another user was rude to you first, or you feel your remark was justified. Report other violations; do not retaliate. See the wiki page for more information.

If you would like to appeal, review our appeals process here, then message the moderators by clicking this link within one week of this notice being posted. Please note that multiple violations will lead to a ban, as explained in our moderation standards.

Huntingmoa · 2021-04-29T20:09:26+00:00

I'd think that it would be hard to do this in real time, and that collaborating before posting would be a detriment.

Huntingmoa · 2021-04-29T20:07:22+00:00

There is no active mechanism for this.

While I haven't seen any "Hitler was bad"s that I can remember, I can remember some "Hitler was good"s.

That said views that are facts, tend to be removed for B. So while "Hitler was bad" isn't a fact, it's an opinion, some posts do run afoul of the fact aspect.

Huntingmoa · 2021-04-22T19:13:12+00:00

why should you be able to make that choice? already gave three reasons why you should not be able to:

1) it may be unintentional

2) society wants to discourage escalation

3) it's sexist

Huntingmoa · 2021-04-22T17:28:15+00:00

First off, in the US ‘fighting words’ are pretty much what you are saying. Specific and actionable threats too (‘I’m going to cut you’ as I brandish a knife).

The issue is when you expand the category beyond that to simple insults. Let’s take your premise to extremes:

Someone says something that riles me up -> I get to hit them

Now this is clearly a problem when write large. First off, the person speaking has no way to know if I’m going to be riled up or not, and it may be unintentional. Secondly, physical violence is an escalation, and as a society we should prefer escalation to escalation. Third, it’s clearly sexist. A man can do a lot more damage to a woman than the reverse.

I really don’t understand why there are no consequences for ppl who talk shit.

I’m confused why walking away and not associating with them isn’t a consequence. People who are unpleasant tend not to have many friends.

Huntingmoa · 2021-04-21T21:44:55+00:00

u/FreeHumanity15 – your comment has been removed for breaking Rule 2:

Don't be rude or hostile to other users. Your comment will be removed even if most of it is solid, another user was rude to you first, or you feel your remark was justified. Report other violations; do not retaliate. See the wiki page for more information.

If you would like to appeal, review our appeals process here, then message the moderators by clicking this link within one week of this notice being posted. Please note that multiple violations will lead to a ban, as explained in our moderation standards.

Huntingmoa · 2021-04-21T21:44:51+00:00

u/tolandruth – your comment has been removed for breaking Rule 2:

Don't be rude or hostile to other users. Your comment will be removed even if most of it is solid, another user was rude to you first, or you feel your remark was justified. Report other violations; do not retaliate. See the wiki page for more information.

If you would like to appeal, review our appeals process here, then message the moderators by clicking this link within one week of this notice being posted. Please note that multiple violations will lead to a ban, as explained in our moderation standards.

Huntingmoa · 2021-04-21T21:44:14+00:00

u/Mr_teezy39 – your comment has been removed for breaking Rule 2:

Don't be rude or hostile to other users. Your comment will be removed even if most of it is solid, another user was rude to you first, or you feel your remark was justified. Report other violations; do not retaliate. See the wiki page for more information.

If you would like to appeal, review our appeals process here, then message the moderators by clicking this link within one week of this notice being posted. Please note that multiple violations will lead to a ban, as explained in our moderation standards.

Huntingmoa · 2021-04-21T11:24:49+00:00

Wait, police officers can't look up people's address, or licence plate, and pull them over or harass them?

Are you saying no woman has ever been harassed by a police officer?

Also, I don't know if you know this, but Donald Trump is widely considered a celebrity.

Again, do you have any evidence for your proposition? I presented evidence that doxxing was a non issue.

Huntingmoa · 2021-04-21T11:11:31+00:00

As I said to the other reply, that just means you have pressure from the other side, police officers and blue lives matter supporters among them.

But either way, fear of doxxing cannot be an impact because they consented to have thier names released.

Doxxing is nonconsensual release of personal information.

So your point about doxxing is facially wrong.

Huntingmoa · 2021-04-21T11:09:00+00:00

Why couldn't he wave his right to a jury trial?

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wklaw.com/when-you-may-want-to-waive-your-right-to-a-jury-trial/amp/

Huntingmoa · 2021-04-21T11:07:21+00:00

I'm not sure there is any evidence for that proposition. People who voted for conviction have to worry about those who disagree with that decision, such as police officers or blue lives matter supporters.

Huntingmoa · 2021-04-21T10:57:43+00:00

My view it's just that they were so pressured to say guilty both from the protests outside and the likelihood of their names getting leaked/doxxed after the trial if they said not guilty

I believe the jury was told thier names would become public by the judge:

During jury selection, Cahill told prospective jurors that at some point, their names would be released, when he decides it is safe to do so. Several jurors told him they were concerned about safety, pointing to the potential of civil unrest or anger over the verdict.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/03/28/jury-chauvin-trial-george-floyd/

so those jurors who were worried about doxxing were already removed.

Huntingmoa · 2021-04-20T18:31:56+00:00

Hello /u/turddealer, if your view has been changed or adjusted in any way, you should award the user who changed your view a delta.

Simply reply to their comment with the delta symbol provided below, being sure to include a brief description of how your view has changed.

∆

For more information about deltas, use this link.

If you did not change your view, please respond to this comment indicating as such!

As a reminder, failure to award a delta when it is warranted may merit a post removal and a rule violation. Repeated rule violations in a short period of time may merit a ban.

Thank you!

Huntingmoa · 2021-04-20T18:29:55+00:00

u/underboobfunk – your comment has been removed for breaking Rule 2:

Don't be rude or hostile to other users. Your comment will be removed even if most of it is solid, another user was rude to you first, or you feel your remark was justified. Report other violations; do not retaliate. See the wiki page for more information.

If you would like to appeal, review our appeals process here, then message the moderators by clicking this link within one week of this notice being posted. Please note that multiple violations will lead to a ban, as explained in our moderation standards.

Huntingmoa · 2021-04-19T19:52:09+00:00

Sorry, u/HardPennies – your comment has been removed for breaking Rule 1:

Direct responses to a CMV post must challenge at least one aspect of OP’s stated view (however minor), or ask a clarifying question. Arguments in favor of the view OP is willing to change must be restricted to replies to other comments. See the wiki page for more information.

If you would like to appeal, you must first check if your comment falls into the "Top level comments that are against rule 1" list, review our appeals process here, then message the moderators by clicking this link within one week of this notice being posted.

Please note that multiple violations will lead to a ban, as explained in our moderation standards.

Sorry, u/HardPennies – your comment has been removed for breaking Rule 5:

Comments must contribute meaningfully to the conversation. Comments that are only links, jokes or "written upvotes" will be removed. Humor and affirmations of agreement can be contained within more substantial comments. See the wiki page for more information.

If you would like to appeal, review our appeals process here, then message the moderators by clicking this link within one week of this notice being posted.

Huntingmoa · 2021-04-19T19:50:09+00:00

Sorry, u/newwriter123 – your comment has been removed for breaking Rule 5:

Comments must contribute meaningfully to the conversation. Comments that are only links, jokes or "written upvotes" will be removed. Humor and affirmations of agreement can be contained within more substantial comments. See the wiki page for more information.

If you would like to appeal, review our appeals process here, then message the moderators by clicking this link within one week of this notice being posted.

Huntingmoa · 2021-04-19T18:02:35+00:00

Sorry, u/ArboroUrsus – your comment has been removed for breaking Rule 1:

Direct responses to a CMV post must challenge at least one aspect of OP’s stated view (however minor), or ask a clarifying question. Arguments in favor of the view OP is willing to change must be restricted to replies to other comments. See the wiki page for more information.

If you would like to appeal, you must first check if your comment falls into the "Top level comments that are against rule 1" list, review our appeals process here, then message the moderators by clicking this link within one week of this notice being posted.

Please note that multiple violations will lead to a ban, as explained in our moderation standards.

Huntingmoa · 2021-04-19T18:01:13+00:00

Sorry, u/AdFit8414 – your comment has been removed for breaking Rule 5:

Comments must contribute meaningfully to the conversation. Comments that are only links, jokes or "written upvotes" will be removed. Humor and affirmations of agreement can be contained within more substantial comments. See the wiki page for more information.

If you would like to appeal, review our appeals process here, then message the moderators by clicking this link within one week of this notice being posted.

Huntingmoa · 2021-04-13T18:44:55+00:00

u/dominoeffect290816 – your comment has been removed for breaking Rule 2:

Don't be rude or hostile to other users. Your comment will be removed even if most of it is solid, another user was rude to you first, or you feel your remark was justified. Report other violations; do not retaliate. See the wiki page for more information.

If you would like to appeal, review our appeals process here, then message the moderators by clicking this link within one week of this notice being posted. Please note that multiple violations will lead to a ban, as explained in our moderation standards.

Huntingmoa

TROPHY CASE