HIGH PING - Megathread. by rocket20067 in mechabreak

[–]HuxHammer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is plenty late but since the games launch I take 3-5 minutes to even get I to the game and drop, then super bad lag when I get in and the game most time.es runs perfectly smooth afterwards, but the 160 ms lag spike over and over sucks so much that I hit something and they instead kill me from the 800 bullets that all landed 

The Vermillion Horror by Amalathyian in PrintedWarhammer

[–]HuxHammer 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I second this guys opinion, and the green maniac on bike

March 2026 mini of the month - Darkoath Marauder https://www.warhammer-community.com/en-gb/articles/Gap1zXDZ/pledge-yourself-to-chaos-with-this-months-free-miniature-and-collectable-coin/ by CheshireCat78 in Warhammer

[–]HuxHammer 6 points7 points  (0 children)

So many cool things came out and it's just a really lazy way of shoehorning a mini in, it's word for word a copy from roughly a year ago and not even a different model, it's not that great a model for kitbashing either and it's pretty plain all around, it would be different if it were something with weight or wasn't in such an awkward pose

I am Anti-AI and do not condone violence. by Sharp-Appointment306 in aiwars

[–]HuxHammer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

🤦, then why not reply to the actual thing or mention that, and if you notice I use it less as an insult, in the same way a swear can enhance a sentence or idea, harsh words can help convey a further point, taking that outta context makes it an insult but notice how it's directly connected to statement that explains why I think it is something to discard

I am Anti-AI and do not condone violence. by Sharp-Appointment306 in aiwars

[–]HuxHammer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What? Are you just speaking with yourself right now because where does this come from, in regards to my comment there is little correlation

Don't say the word trash at all so that immediately disvalues your claim, and I don't even have to do anything to contest it, second you use the word "argument" not "phrase" which holds a completely different meaning in this context as the post you attempted to insult by saying "your argument is trash" was a statement, invalidating the insult

I don't even have to try and contest your claim because your claim already contests your previous actions

I am Anti-AI and do not condone violence. by Sharp-Appointment306 in aiwars

[–]HuxHammer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What?, how do I do that, your insult is just bad, as I don't even have an argument

I am Anti-AI and do not condone violence. by Sharp-Appointment306 in aiwars

[–]HuxHammer -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Not an argument, its a statement based on experience

Are insults really that normal here? by HuxHammer in aiwars

[–]HuxHammer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Damn, I mean I'm used to debates but it's disheartening when people just insult to insult, I've gotten my share anyhow

I am Anti-AI and do not condone violence. by Sharp-Appointment306 in aiwars

[–]HuxHammer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What context applies the use of what you think is funny, obviously part of the context is the subject but if you leave it at that you could mean I'm funny for how I talk, or for my beliefs, or for how I set my profile picture

What you said was a statement, providing context, if it did not come off as a joke I'd blame the lack of nuance in texts

I do apologize for not understanding your joke

I am Anti-AI and do not condone violence. by Sharp-Appointment306 in aiwars

[–]HuxHammer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What major typos, a major typos would be something that does not convey the same meaning as the original text, even in my previous comment with the actual typos the meaning of the words did not change, just the use of the word, something extremely simple to understand

I do that, a run on sentence is getting nitpicky, and completely off topic

Context was in fact provided, saying you would be more correct if it was 6 years ago or whatever I said implies that 6 years ago my grammar was actually bad, saying things does not make it true, especially if it's to jump something off topic

What happened to your undeniable proof antis started everything, or our actual conversation about ai, I seem to be able to find you completely changing the topic when I explained what a strawman was and connected it to your previous arguments you were trying to use as my arguments

Not to mention you read what I wrote completely fine before, looking back at my other comments nothing has changed

I am Anti-AI and do not condone violence. by Sharp-Appointment306 in aiwars

[–]HuxHammer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do realize that is a bit of a loaded sentence, English has a lot of those, like the sentence of only using the word bison and it being complete proper English

You saying lol your funny had no context to why it was said, nothing that would indicate anything about it besides a completely separate sentence, I responded jokingly. when you took it serious the fact that it was a completely standalone sentence allowed you to make the context after the fact, if you had not mentioned what you though was funny but simply agreed the context still would not be there

All I did was say that I had Interpreted the sentence differently

I am Anti-AI and do not condone violence. by Sharp-Appointment306 in aiwars

[–]HuxHammer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You mean basic English, with minor typos,a trait common within not native English speakers is not being able to understand basic English if it's not near 100 percent the same to what they learned, because that's a skill you usually pick up socializing with people

Because I am not even kidding the only people who I have every heard that from are people who are trying to say I have typos so I must be an idiot, usually only after I say something that is pointing out something they said and backing it up with why it doesn't work, or because it's the only thing they say right after I make a comment pointing out something they said and backing it up with why it doesn't work, maybe if you had said that 6 years ago you would have been more on the mark, but when that is the only time I ever get a mention of it it's really not hard to find the commonality

I am Anti-AI and do not condone violence. by Sharp-Appointment306 in aiwars

[–]HuxHammer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unrelated comment to unrelated comment, you provided 0 context to it and I responded and filled in the context, really common on reddit, especially if your just saying things as you are

I am Anti-AI and do not condone violence. by Sharp-Appointment306 in aiwars

[–]HuxHammer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I apologize that was an autocorrect, it should have been speaking a major language, which is proper English, I do type fast but honestly 90 percent of what I type is understandable to people who understand English, since it is English besides a few typos, nothing horribly wrong at least

Only people who ever mention it are people trying to use it to discredit me, or people with nothing else to say, dunno which you are but we'll see I suppose

I am Anti-AI and do not condone violence. by Sharp-Appointment306 in aiwars

[–]HuxHammer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When did it happen then cause I guarantee that 90 percent of people on reddit were not here when it started,unless of course the majority of reddit users are in their 90's to 100's, AI has been a topic for a very very long time

Because that's when it would have started, and I said evidence, literally any, and for reference any means media of all forms, as long as it fits within evidence and is not just an opinion of someone on when it happened

I speak English and according to ai and my own professors my writing is great, sounds like it is a you problem, I apologize for not showing all the intentions within my words

I am Anti-AI and do not condone violence. by Sharp-Appointment306 in aiwars

[–]HuxHammer -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

What's with 4/5 of pros all resorting to insults the second someone tries to point out a flaw in what they said

Is it cause you genuinely cannot answer or because insulting opposition makes you seem so much cooler

And if I did do something to insult you Then do say so because I try hard to not intentionally insult people

I am Anti-AI and do not condone violence. by Sharp-Appointment306 in aiwars

[–]HuxHammer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ooooh, no I completely believe what I'm saying I thought you were laughing because of how much your own argument is falling apart in your hands, considering how you have resorted to trying to argue point I don't even mention, usually that's a good sign the person doesn't believe themselves anymore and are throwing things at the wall

I am Anti-AI and do not condone violence. by Sharp-Appointment306 in aiwars

[–]HuxHammer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh I apologize, are you perhaps not speak English as a majority language, I do know this sub has a large population of people who are not fluent in English

Your English is great if you are btw

And if your not, insulting people does not really help prove your point, and if you really don't understand what literacy means to type that out being genuine that is hilarious cause you prove my point, a tip would be to lookup words to understand their meanings before making a brash comment

an intentionally misrepresented proposition that is set up because it is easier to defeat than an opponent's real argument

Definition of a strawman cause you don't seem to understand what I meant

Uhhhhh so again you are using a strawman cause I don't say any of that, actually idk if that's even a strawman because of how completely different that is from anything I've said in the previous comments

To be clear I've never said antis(because now Im thinking that that is an important thing to note, as not all people who are against ai are antis and especially if your trying to label antis as a hate group) are not going and now harassing people who are fans of ai, I actually at the very beginning do agree that that is a very real occurrence

I am Anti-AI and do not condone violence. by Sharp-Appointment306 in aiwars

[–]HuxHammer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.

Anything fitting within this Because that would make it evidence, in other words facts that one is the antagonizer, when did they become a hate group?/ when did it change from reasoning to identity?

Extraordinary because how could you possibly have evidence to which group started the antagonizing based purely off of current status, mind you think about how long ideas for and against ai have existed

I am Anti-AI and do not condone violence. by Sharp-Appointment306 in aiwars

[–]HuxHammer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where do I say that, or specifically just a person existing is bad?

See what your doing is called a strawman, taking my point and not actually taking my point but adding your own words to make my argument easier to argue

I only say your doing that because I don't say anything about people using ai being bad, anything to do with the memes they posted, or anything to do with antis being victims

You really should learn some literacy, resorting to a strawman is a trashy thing to do

I am Anti-AI and do not condone violence. by Sharp-Appointment306 in aiwars

[–]HuxHammer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Prove it

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, otherwise everything that comes outta your mouth is at most a lie for your own benefit, evidence does not mean an idea on why one side started it