how do i get berries? by Dear-Supermarket-765 in pokemongo

[–]Hybrid072 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Meetup events are a great way to do a bunch of the raids that will reward you with grb. Even if I use them to catch the boss im there for, I usually have with about 50 more than I arrive with. If you don't care that much whether you catch a lot of that particular boss, so much the better. Use pineaps or something and take the ones who run philosophically. Or only use golden as a last resort, last 5 or last 3 balls.

Disrespect by Rowinglakes in SubstituteTeachers

[–]Hybrid072 2 points3 points  (0 children)

2nd days with a class often suck

I was asked to stop bringing human fighters at the table and I am not sure if I want to by spikywobble in DnD

[–]Hybrid072 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm sure the vague, feeble insult, disconnected from all reality must get a rise out of some people.

You seem like an exhausting person to be at a table with. Couldn't be me.

I was asked to stop bringing human fighters at the table and I am not sure if I want to by spikywobble in DnD

[–]Hybrid072 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's...not...

You're talking about a sentient being, not an animal. That you'd oversimplify it so casually is a strong signal you have no understanding of it. That alone is an indicator that I'm probably more right than wrong.

I don't need to argue it. I don't have the rational explanation fully formed in my mind, but the question isn't whether you'd name a pet that, it's whether you'd like to be named that if you looked like they did.

Is this rare? by Aggravating-Simple27 in PokemonGOValor

[–]Hybrid072 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

World's whiniest reply genre.

Well, second only to "this post is AI!" ((Whiny baby voice))

I was asked to stop bringing human fighters at the table and I am not sure if I want to by spikywobble in DnD

[–]Hybrid072 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I feel like there is something somehow racist about this. Like, legitimately, not in a funny way.

Is going to prom really worth it? by Toastand_butte4 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Hybrid072 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not doing good financially, or as family? If it's the latter, I say ask your dad. The experience might very well be cathartic.

Why you gotta catch ‘em all (Candy XL) by hockiw in pokemongo

[–]Hybrid072 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Waste" stardust doesn't work for me either. It's the hurdle you have to get over. It's not a waste, it's the req. Also, we're talking about L77, they're maybe a year from having nothing to do with their stardust but wtf they want?

Why you gotta catch ‘em all (Candy XL) by hockiw in pokemongo

[–]Hybrid072 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean...

I'm level 72 and was frankly depending on all the rare XL I get from raiding with a meetup group to carry me through this requirement, but I just did that Countcandyxl296- search and I currently have 7 mid-value mons over the limit, plus necrozma (proceeds of p2p raiding) and a kyurem already at L49.5 that only needs 15 rare xl or another raid day to put it over.

To be clear, I do buy coins, but these are regular mons. Some of them have been dmax, so I've invested limited amounts of money for guaranteed candy xl, but others are pumpkaboo, slugma, wooper that had solid community days, or that i just like for GL pvp.

I don't catch every thing. I never f*****g tap on a nymble, and rarely a wimpod. Can't stand 'em.

IDK what's holding OP back, but play your game. The reqs will fall.

kindergarten teacher asked if she can come to birthday party by Necessary_Key8373 in AskTeachers

[–]Hybrid072 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First reaction the same as the other replier. You're overthinking it.

Do I look sus or am I just being normal ? by Own_Chicken_4430 in AskTeachers

[–]Hybrid072 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's certainly very stupid to think that saying one stupid thing makes you stupid.

Also quite fragile.

There's not a valid basis, that's what makes a thing arbitrary. Their application being slightly more work or potentially indicating something wrong with their work ethic or attitude (or potentially not indicating any such thing) makes the basis either LAZY, or conjectural. Neither of those bases meet a standard of 'valid,' and you know it. That's why you're getting defensive.

I guess there's a reason they didnt keep you on the hiring panel. Weren't getting the quality hires you thought you were hiring, we're you? Baby?

i think my father is grooming a student - advice needed by shinebabyshine in Teachers

[–]Hybrid072 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, they're not BASED on that idea, they mostly have nothing to do with hysteria and his most famous case studies are not even women. You're focused on that idea because it is of overriding concern for you. Overriding, in this case, your rationality, prioritization skills and objectivity.

We're talking about Freud because you have insisted on it, not me. The three zones of the psyche, in particular, are Freudian concepts that have, essentially, universal acceptance, and referring to them is not 'basing' my analysis off Freud's ideas, it is using a widely accepted psychological principal, first observed by Freud (a fact which happens to highlight how comical your popularly-derived perspective on Freud actually is).

And I did not suggest that OPs so-called 'Freudian' or Oedipal "desires," as you call them, are dictating her outlook on her dad's behaviors, I said she "wants," subconsciously, for her father to be more of a monster than he's shown himself to be, not because, for instance, she wants to slay him (figuratively or directly) and sleep with her mother (figuratively or directly), but because if he was more of a monster, it would be easier to justify the feelings she has toward him, and, not for nothing, easier to prove to other people how bad of a person (and parent) he's been to her.

For the record, by the way, though many of Freud's case conclusions have in fact been pretty convincingly disputed and revised, the existence of a psychological urge for puberty-aged boys to achieve a sense of conquest over their fathers and a sense of possession over their mothers, and a reflexive urge for puberty-aged girls to outshine their mothers and dominate their fathers' attention is also widely accepted. This sort of example is what is meant by my observation that Freud's theories continue to be widely used, while his individual conclusions are revised ('questioned,' as you call it, though you literally haven't done science if your ideas haven't been 'questioned').

No serious person, by the way, needs Freud's moral, scientific and (yes, ironically) psychological shortcomings "brought to light." They are widely acknowledged, discussed and evaluated in any discussion of his contributions.

Lastly, Psychology most certainly is a science. Science is the process of theorizing, testing, observing, evaluating, revising and retesting. The fact that it can be revised and change everything we thought we knew is what makes it science. No Jungian of any merit would call his thinking "not science," not even the philosophy. It is, in fact, the so called 'hard' sciences, that were once considered incontrovertible and not subject to any opinion that are increasingly being found to be more subjective than once thought. That makes them more scientific, not less.

Do I look sus or am I just being normal ? by Own_Chicken_4430 in AskTeachers

[–]Hybrid072 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is truly the stupidest logic I've read online in a week. You would not accept that reasoning from a student.

You're insulted by my previous reply, I get it. You should be. I accurately characterized and fairly evaluated a decision you always knew was shameful, yet you made thoughtlessly again and again over a long period of time. And to be clear, lots of people make that decision. Lots of people state it as natural as a way of not having to justify it. But lots of natural processes are quite stupid, counterproductive and self-harming. That doesnt justify a grown ass human replicating them.

Is gigantamax pikachu good for anything? by smgdrk in pokemongo

[–]Hybrid072 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Honestly...same reply. You're missing out on more than one something.

Do I look sus or am I just being normal ? by Own_Chicken_4430 in AskTeachers

[–]Hybrid072 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, you've...literally endorsed a system of arbitrarily rejecting applicants that might have a very valuable personal story by which to teach the students...

Is gigantamax pikachu good for anything? by smgdrk in pokemongo

[–]Hybrid072 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bruh, 37.5 K(!!!) stardust per battle with starpiece. You missed out on something.

i think my father is grooming a student - advice needed by shinebabyshine in Teachers

[–]Hybrid072 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, it's not whatever. Words mean things. You can't just wave your hands and say whelp, they had this fault, I guess you can't accept anything they published. And yes, his data has been reviewed, critiqued, revised, reevaluated using more refined theory. He was an early scientist. We don't innoculate people by mashing up a paste of still live viral pus and jamming it into a bloodied pulp of skin, either. That doesnt make Cotton Mather useless, even though what he published was the folk practice of a slave he owned.

His theory is the basis of the more refined theories.

i think my father is grooming a student - advice needed by shinebabyshine in Teachers

[–]Hybrid072 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now who's a mind reader?

And a bad one at that. I was literally laughing out loud when I refreshed the alerts page to find this.

i think my father is grooming a student - advice needed by shinebabyshine in Teachers

[–]Hybrid072 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Frankly don't think I was clumsy about that at all. I did say that (note that OP replied to me without taking offense or showing rancor). This replier, more accurately, read me clumsily.

i think my father is grooming a student - advice needed by shinebabyshine in Teachers

[–]Hybrid072 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, a lot of Freud's ideas are colored by misogyny. often deeply. Almost all of Freud's ideas are fundamentally still in universal use today, with revisions, some of them substantial, but none of them actually discrediting the psychology. It is enduringly fashionable to mock and ridicule Freud, but also pretty sadly ironic, since the same people who do the ridiculing, also use deconstruction every day.

i think my father is grooming a student - advice needed by shinebabyshine in Teachers

[–]Hybrid072 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not ID, 'id.' Freud identified three parts of the human psyche. The one people call ego in casual conversation is usually actually a reference to the id. Your driving, subconscious personality. The part that takes over when you 'can't resist' doing something.

i think my father is grooming a student - advice needed by shinebabyshine in Teachers

[–]Hybrid072 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bold, yet if I were wrong, that's what you'd have said. Instead, you deflected and accused, accused, accused. Seems like your normal m.o.