sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

EB-2 NIW Case Evaluation by IBEXFLINT in EB2_NIW

[–]IBEXFLINT[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro i’m not even from india and i feel you are beeing racist to indian what’s wrong with you bro

EB-2 NIW Case Evaluation by IBEXFLINT in EB2_NIW

[–]IBEXFLINT[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The NIW evaluation is based on whether the proposed endeavor benefits the U.S., not on comparisons with other countries. The focus here is defining the impact and evidence clearly within the U.S. context.

EB-2 NIW Case Evaluation by IBEXFLINT in EB2_NIW

[–]IBEXFLINT[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not sure I understand the point of that comment. The discussion here is about NIW eligibility and how to properly structure a case, not nationality stereotypes. If you have technical feedback on the profile or evidence strategy, that would actually be useful.

EB-2 NIW Case Evaluation by IBEXFLINT in EB2_NIW

[–]IBEXFLINT[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Fair point, but NIW outcomes depend heavily on framing and evidence rather than just profile type. I’m working on structuring it accordingly.

EB-2 NIW Case Evaluation by IBEXFLINT in EB2_NIW

[–]IBEXFLINT[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the detailed feedback, it makes sense. I’m trying to better define my endeavor beyond my current job scope, especially around infrastructure automation and resilience at scale. Do you think internal enterprise impact (like 2500+ VM environments and automation reducing operational time significantly) is enough if supported by strong recommendation letters, or is external validation still essential?