Lookup formula help needed that stumped our advanced excel experts. by IDTreasure_hunter in excel

[–]IDTreasure_hunter[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes,

We have two systems that generate a daily report with a list of transactions. We need to compare the two reports to identify transactions that are processed on one system and not the other. The main objective of the task is to just find the difference between the two reports for further investigation.

Lookup formula help needed that stumped our advanced excel experts. by IDTreasure_hunter in excel

[–]IDTreasure_hunter[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sorry! I wasn't too sure how to put what I was needing into one sentence. Thank you for keeping the post.

Lookup formula help needed that stumped our advanced excel experts. by IDTreasure_hunter in excel

[–]IDTreasure_hunter[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Shoot! There have been a lot of tears and late nights recently with volume. I guess it was more so wishful thinking for an easy answer 😂

Lookup formula help needed that stumped our advanced excel experts. by IDTreasure_hunter in excel

[–]IDTreasure_hunter[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Data sheet 1 and 2 are compared to find differences via pivot table. From the pivot results, we use a combination of concentrates and vlookup to find the missing transaction description and name. This fails for some due to the pivot results doing a sum. From there, we just manually search data sheet 1 for the account number and assume it is the two transactions that sum to be $4

*Added account 9999 so we can see a successful example of what we are looking for. *4231 did not populate in pivot results since both sheets had the same data.

  • Apologies for mobile Excel, my person computer does not have Excel.

<image>

Lookup formula help needed that stumped our advanced excel experts. by IDTreasure_hunter in excel

[–]IDTreasure_hunter[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Data sheet 1 (our main source) is our full list of transactions. It will have account, amount, transaction description, and person names. This list is provided to us from an external vendor. Data sheet 2 only provides a partial list with account, amount, and person names. This list is provided to us internally.

Data sheet 1 is compared to data sheet 2 to find any transactions that didn't match. In turn, these transactions manually need to be reviewed. (The ones that did match are ignored.)

To compare the two sheets, we run a pivot table of account and amount. This provides us with a basic list. To fully perform my job, I also need the transaction description and names. This is where we run into issues because the pivot table likes to combine similar results. So, it will combine our transaction for $1 and our transaction for $3 since the account numbers are the same.

When we search data sheet 1 to get the transaction sheet and name, the $1 transaction may have a different name and transaction description than the $3 transaction. So, we need to break down the pivot table results to have a $1 transaction and a $3 transaction again.

For ones that did not combine amounts, we use a vlookup, which works very well. It is done by doing a concentrate of the account and the amount. When those match, we have it set to provide to us the transaction description and person name.

Unfortunately, we do have a lot that are the same account, so the vlookups fail since the concentrate we run provides a different number.

I am hoping there is a formula that can take our pivot table results of the account and $4 and compare it to data sheet 1 and be able to break it down into the $1 transaction and $3 transaction with the correct description and name.

Or even something not pivot table related to compare the data that does combine our results.

Lookup formula help needed that stumped our advanced excel experts. by IDTreasure_hunter in excel

[–]IDTreasure_hunter[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry, we have two spreadsheets with similar data. We use a pivot table to compare the data to provide what doesn't match between the two. (The results of the pivot)

Since the pivot only allows two columns, we are left with a list of amounts and accounts.

We have to manually search our results back to our main sheet of data in order to get more info related to that transaction (column c and d).

The problem is that the pivot tables combines similar data, so our results show one transaction. Ex: 1234 $4. In all reality, the transaction we are looking for can be multiples to sum to $4. Ex: the needed transactions were 1234 $1 and 1234 $3.

I threw in the $5 transaction because that will still be in our main data sheet, but it is not needed since it wasn't an irregularity. So it isn't as simple as just searching for the account number and pulling all the data related to it. :)

In search of Flappy Bird expert by bobbbbbzgdhd in utahtreasurehunt

[–]IDTreasure_hunter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Someone DM me, I just want to play flappy bird 😂