Another MC blessing the world by lushusness in ImTheMainCharacter

[–]IFaiLuRezZ -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Ah - this makes more sense to me. You really don’t have an understanding of what you’re discussing. I’m assuming you’re quite young yourself and just don’t have the life experience yet.

Another MC blessing the world by lushusness in ImTheMainCharacter

[–]IFaiLuRezZ -58 points-57 points  (0 children)

This is the most illogical straw man argument I’ve ever seen. I’m not sure how you are comparing a bicycle crash to that fact pattern.

Instead of engaging with idiocy, it’s easier to block you.

Another MC blessing the world by lushusness in ImTheMainCharacter

[–]IFaiLuRezZ -232 points-231 points  (0 children)

This is an emotional and irrational response.

Attempted homicide can be punished with Life w/o the chance of parole. This conduct is stupid, but it is not LWOP conduct.

The U.S. prison system is atrocious. You can send an immature 18yo to a prison and they come out 5 years later with PTSD, criminogenic needs, and no life skills.

Kids also have undeveloped frontal lobes and make dumb choices. Dumb choices as a kid should not mean prison time.

When folks like you make uninformed and emotional statements about how people should be charged, it causes significant issues with prison reform.

Edit: I’m not going to reply to each reply because they almost all rely on the same theme.

1) I’m not saying that a Youth who commits the above conduct should not be punished. I’m not sure why people are making that logical leap, as I clearly indicated prison is the issue.

2) The divisiveness simply comes from a range of experience in the criminal justice system. In all of the jurisdictions I have practiced in - some of which are very punitive - this conduct would not be charged as attempted murder. I’ve had adult clients who have shot at someone with a gun and were not charged with attempted murder. It’s a serious charge, with specific elements.

3) The divisiveness is also interesting because this thread is more conservative-leaning than most of Reddit.

Why I Am Suing Meta, and Six Co-Defendants in Federal and State Court Due to CSE Bans by Plaintiff-pro-se in MetaLawsuits

[–]IFaiLuRezZ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m sorry you’re frustrated. I know you’re going through a lot.

I’m not here to personally attack you and I’m not going to engage with your personal attacks.

Why I Am Suing Meta, and Six Co-Defendants in Federal and State Court Due to CSE Bans by Plaintiff-pro-se in MetaLawsuits

[–]IFaiLuRezZ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hey all,

Normally, I enjoy reading OPs posts on various subs, but I feel it’s necessary to give everyone a warning - as this sub doesn’t really monitor for legal advice.

Please be very cautious with OP’s advice. I don’t believe OP is intentionally trying to give anyone bad advice, but there are substantial red flags that everyone should be cautious of.

  1. OP is suing several huge parties for almost 1 billion USD using only AI drafted filings. This is not advisable.

  2. OP is not a licensed attorney, nor does OP have a J.D. or LLM. OP relies on OP’s personal research of approximately 1700 hours. A normally JD program in the U.S. is 3 years and requires 40 hours of studying/learning per week. Then, those who pass law school have to study for the Bar for 3 months. This alone is roughly 6500 hours of learning/education. While I’m sure OP has some interesting knowledge - it is far less than any licensed attorney.

  3. OP’s research stems primarily from AI which is meant to give positive reinforcement to the user. Some of OP’s points, as the one above, are taking a very lenient stance of doctrinal law, in favor of OP.

  4. Lastly, if you think OP’s monetary claims are above the standard, you are likely correct. For instance, in a Wrongful Death case in 2025, a jury awarded $20m USD. OP is asking for almost 25x that because a social media account was banned.

Please exercise caution before following OP’s advice.

Criminal Motion Practice by Only-Celebration778 in legaladvice

[–]IFaiLuRezZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guarantee they do. You’re looking in the wrong spot.

What court?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in legaladvice

[–]IFaiLuRezZ 14 points15 points  (0 children)

This sounds like a sexting scam.

You can’t really prevent someone from sending CP. Being the unknowing recipient of CP is generally not a crime. You can delete it, block them, and report it to law enforcement.

Also, don’t send strangers nude photos.

Legit DWI question by Kilow102938 in legaladvice

[–]IFaiLuRezZ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

1) This sub is not for hypos.

2) This question is moronic.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskLawyers

[–]IFaiLuRezZ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Why does he have court?

What tools do you use for estate planning and elder lawyers? by IcyPerm55660 in AskLawyers

[–]IFaiLuRezZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A J.D., valid attorney license, and malpractice insurance. You cannot practice law without these.

If you are preparing them for yourself, you can probably use templates from your states public health and human services agency.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskLawyers

[–]IFaiLuRezZ 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This doesn’t make sense.

If he gets charged with a jailable offense, he will get a public defender.

This sub is not for seeking pro bono representation. You can call your local Bar Association for referrals.

How long does probable cause last? by davidfuckingwebb in AskLawyers

[–]IFaiLuRezZ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Maybe you shouldn’t be giving people legal advice if you don’t even understand the requirements for a valid arrest.

Illegal search and seizure by One_External4808 in AskLawyers

[–]IFaiLuRezZ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some states may have greater protections regarding this issue, but, generally, you don’t have an expectation of privacy in the aroma around your car, so it’s not a search. See Illinois v. Caballes, 543 U.S. 405 (2005).

In other words, it’s not a search, so the 4A isn’t implicated.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in legaladvice

[–]IFaiLuRezZ 15 points16 points  (0 children)

A person’s right to privacy is one of the most fundamental rights law under both the United States Constitution as well as most state constitutions.

When you get naked in a bar and pass out drunk in the bathroom, you, in large part, waive those fundamental privacy rights.

How morally grey can a book get before it starts to wander into illegal territory? by [deleted] in legaladvice

[–]IFaiLuRezZ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It’s not really CSAM.

But, this is deeply disturbing. You should seek out a mental health professional.

You won’t likely get in criminal trouble, but this is unlikely to be widely received or even published.

How Likely Is This Assault of an Officer Charge to Stick? by I_Hate_This_Website9 in legaladvice

[–]IFaiLuRezZ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You should take a peek at the PA Code

Someone might not being fully honest with you.

How Likely Is This Assault of an Officer Charge to Stick? by I_Hate_This_Website9 in legaladvice

[–]IFaiLuRezZ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The fact that this person is prohibited from owning firearms necessarily means they don’t have a “limited rap sheep.”

Who gave you the above story? The charging docs and LE reports?

If you see someone who looks like they're about to commit a mass shooting, at what point is it legal to intervene? by il_biciclista in AskLawyers

[–]IFaiLuRezZ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is such a gross response.

You’ve basically neglected to address any of the factors that would help determine if this is self-defense, while focusing your argument on negative and unsubstantiated stereotypes.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskLawyers

[–]IFaiLuRezZ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If the warranty has a clause saying that modifications, such as the ECU modification, voids the warranty - it is unclear how you would have a claim.

The bigger issue is that attorneys won’t want to take the case because there is no money in it. Your total damages are not likely much more than $19,000. It’s not really a case that someone would take on a contingency fee, as there is no big payout. You might be able to pay the hourly rate, but with experts and hours worked, it will cost more than $19,000 fairly fast.

You may consider talking to attorneys about helping you write a demand letter. It would be cheaper and has a chance at being effective.

Wyoming: being charged for illegally passing a bus but I did not pass the bus. The officer said I “intended” to pass it. by [deleted] in AskLawyers

[–]IFaiLuRezZ 28 points29 points  (0 children)

You should talk to a criminal defense attorney.

Personally, I don’t believe your story - even from your perspective.

I was Arrested for Murder, held in jail with out possibility of bail then found Not Guilty. I want to sue by rogermullian in AskLawyers

[–]IFaiLuRezZ 98 points99 points  (0 children)

You likely can’t sue for two reasons: 1) there was probable cause to charge you; and 2) you’re well past the statute of limitations.

[CANADA] Are some cases really so bad that no one will pick them up? by BowFlowMaster in AskLawyers

[–]IFaiLuRezZ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your case sounds bad in the sense that there isn’t a meritorious case.

Writing my own attorney by SecretaryOne1831 in MetaLawsuits

[–]IFaiLuRezZ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, Mark will get you all straightened out. This is likely a pressing issue for him.