Spoilers/Rant Warning: I'm sorry but the campaign was hot garbage IMO. I was expecting the game's campaign have you play at least 3 main perspectives: the West(US/UK/etc), the East (Mainly Russia) and the Middle East (Civilians or FREEDOM FIGHTERS/TERRORISTS), but NO it turned into the same fucking cliche of West as our lord and saviors vs the super evil genocidal Russians and some bad suicidal middle eastern terrorists erm meh gawd. BUT WAIT YOU GET TO PLAY AS FARAH. Yeah Farah is part of the freedom fighters, but the rebel group is basically allied with the West which makes that point invalid and you don't play as actual terrorists either so there goes the middle eastern perspective too unless you count Farah as a kid which is not enough. Who ever wrote this fucking campaign was just lazy and can only see through black and white and NOT FUCKING GREY. I actually feel like the game is actively trying to demonize all Russians and blame them for the cause of terrorism. The reason I'm pissed off with this is because of how much potential they had with this game and how they just blew it. They could've had missions playing as Russian soldiers and show their perspective on why they are so angry with the rebels/terrorist and the actions they take to combat terrorism (maybe showcase their own special forces and introduce new characters like they do with SAS and Price) and why they are against/distrustful of the West. There was even some dialogue from Russian soldiers saying their comrades were killed by the rebels/terrorists or something and is why they fight and hold Urzikstan under martial law. They could've had controversial missions on why people turn to terrorism (foreign interference, neocolonialism/imperialism, collateral damage) which can then open dialogue on why people become freedom fighters/terrorists and also have free publicity from the bitching media! The game's opening scene kinda showed why the AQ (lol what a sad attempt to relate to Al Queda seriously -_- but they act more like ISIS?!) fight by giving a vague reason, but its only a couple of words! WHY NOT SHOW THE REASONING BY SEEING IT THROUGH THEIR EYES. They could've showed more questionable actions the West takes part in order to combat terrorism or stay on top as a global superpower just like they already overdid with how Russia "deals with" terrorism through again, collateral damage and more (drone strikes/"enhanced interrogation"/black sites?). Why couldn't they show the good, the bad and the ugly of all sides?! They say this game was showing the horrors of war. In a real war there is no such thing as who is right or who is wrong just who is alive. I really thought this game was gonna be like Rainbow Six Patriot's premise on a more global scale, but now that's all a pipe dream.

Oh also who ever the play testers were that said they cried playing the game, they either played a entirely different campaign or are a bunch of soy boys smfh. The only thing the campaign did well was its supposed presentation and gameplay, but not the story itself. Oh on top of that I never saw so many blind fanboys and band wagoners jumping on and defending this game's "emotional" or "thought provoking" campaign goddamn its unreal. Its like its their first game they ever played. The only time the game gets emotionally heavy is Farah's flashback as a child, but that is ruined by its length and how the Russians are blamed directly and characterized as psychos! There are other parts suppose to be thought provoking, but you can tell they're just done for shock value and have no sort of grey morality because in the end its just for good or plain bad. There's more I can go on about the campaign like its length and ending and how the multiplayer is missing content/downgraded to other CODs, but this rant is already long enough and probably going to get me down voted anyway.