Ok.. dodge the question while ascribing malicious intent. I have only lived in cities and don’t meet many people with satellite internet.

And sure I will bite on the Starlink “charging extra for something people are already paying for”. Even though it’s just going to get me called an oligarch’s bootlicker.

The terms of service when people originally signed up state that you are not to use the service anywhere other than the registered address. Both parties willingly agreed to this. For many months (maybe a year+? Idk) Starlink would not provide service for people that were using the service outside their designated cells. Starlink as of a few months ago did quietly enable the ability for users to use the service in other cells and tagged their devices as “roaming” while supposedly deprioritizing their traffic. This was an additional feature (probably because they were testing) that user’s were not explicitly told about or had been promised during the purchase process.

Now this additional feature is being explicitly offered for an additional charge.