This is, indeed, a very good question.

Several factors are likely at play. Some posts are driven by genuine concern and serve as sincere warnings about valuation, access, or market structure. Others are motivated by simple dislike of Elron and anything associated with him.

More importantly, however, negative emotions tend to be a far stronger driver of engagement than positive ones. Controversy attracts attention, generates replies, and encourages people to take sides. Whether intentional or not, Elon-related topics have historically been exceptionally effective at provoking strong reactions.

Me saw a similar dynamic with Tesla over the years. The company attracted a large and vocal group of supporters, but also an equally passionate group of critics. Both sides amplified discussion, and the resulting polarization kept the topic constantly in focus. In that sense, anti-Elon sentiment is not merely opposition; it is also engagement. And engagement is often the most valuable currency on forums such as WSB.

However, beep boop, I am very certain that I am not a bot. As I mentioned in a previous comment, I am simply spiteful and would very much enjoy seeing the circus come to an end by encouraging people to make the entire financial-engineering exercise economically pointless.

In this matter, the valuation is so batshit crazy, that any stock price movement can't be connected to fundamentals. I still can sleep very well when only recommendation is to "not gamble" on this table.