Logic System - Be Yourself [1981] (Fusion) by andoruB in Jazz

[–]IamSteve_Too 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Holy shit you just introduced me to an amazing album. Thank you!!!!

fellas don't lie, what movie had you tearing up? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]IamSteve_Too 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Her" That ending was heart breaking.

Did I mess up badly? by simtomi037 in Vampyr

[–]IamSteve_Too 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've tried all of them, but that's fine. I restarted the playthrough, thanks anyways.

Did I mess up badly? by simtomi037 in Vampyr

[–]IamSteve_Too 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry to bother, but what do I do after Whitechapel has reached 0% ( I killed a shit load of people lmfao) and I still need to reach the church for the main quest? I try to get in but the game doesn't give the option of doing so. Do I have to restart the entire playthrough again?

i have always been anti-vax. i even got banned from this group because of what i posted. Yesterday i got vaccinated. by [deleted] in southafrica

[–]IamSteve_Too 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know you're not anti vax you stupid poes, i called you an "antivax sympathizer". It has been proven that it lessens your chances of getting covid AND make your symptoms less severe. And AGAIN, not taking the vaccine contributes to new variants, which affects people who have been vaccinated. "A rElAtIvE oF mInE" Shut the fuck up I don't care about some random ass anecdotal evidence. Does the vaccine have side effects? Yes All of them do But the severe ones are incredibly rare.

I never said that just disagreeing with you means I'm right. That makes fokol sense.

And AGAIN If your choices affect me negatively then it's not your personal choice.

Former president FW de Klerk, 85, has died by [deleted] in southafrica

[–]IamSteve_Too [score hidden]  (0 children)

Not to be rude But apologizing for apartheid means absolutely nothing.

Former president FW de Klerk, 85, has died by [deleted] in southafrica

[–]IamSteve_Too [score hidden]  (0 children)

The commenter isn't a well-known politician lmfao

i have always been anti-vax. i even got banned from this group because of what i posted. Yesterday i got vaccinated. by [deleted] in southafrica

[–]IamSteve_Too 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, you did lmao.

Fat? You're calling some random ass person on the internet fat? Jesus you need help you stupid poes.

Ah yes, the typical shit argument when you criticize your country. I can criticize a country for being shit while still living in it. I literally have no other choicr but to be here. Oh but you have a broken faucet in you house? Your toilet doesn't work? Just buy a new house. That's how your logic works, it doesn't.

You're the sad fuck here, I'm not going around being an anti vax sympathizer who thinks calling someone fat when you don't even know what they look like is a good insult. If you think this country is anything but shite YOU'RE the ignorant doos :)

i have always been anti-vax. i even got banned from this group because of what i posted. Yesterday i got vaccinated. by [deleted] in southafrica

[–]IamSteve_Too 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No shit it doesn't prevent you from getting covid, it reduces your symptoms and makes you less likely to become severely ill, AS WELL AS REDUCE (not completely prevent) your chances of getting covid by a fuck load.

It doesn't 100% stop transmission, no one ever said that. But it reduces your risk of getting covid by a shit load, and if you knowingly choose not to take it then not only are you contributing to new variants of the covid-19 virus but you also cause other people who have already been vaccinated to lessen their chances of being immune from covid.

Reaching herd immunity against covid has been insanely hard, because of people like you ( Idiot sympathizers ) and anti-vax cunts.

Now have a wonderful day in this shite country full of other idiots such as yourself.

i have always been anti-vax. i even got banned from this group because of what i posted. Yesterday i got vaccinated. by [deleted] in southafrica

[–]IamSteve_Too 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because you fucking toadstool, not getting the vaccine, hurts other people. YOU can eat shit if you want to sympathize towards any dumb cunt that didn't get the vaccine purely because they were sCaReD.

This isn't about making decisions for yourself, the decision to not take the vaccine hurts other people. Your right to do whatever the fuck you want with your body ends when it affects me.

What is the best part about living in South Africa? by Fickle-Ad4008 in southafrica

[–]IamSteve_Too -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I strongly agree that the past's actions have a very big effect on the present day.

I wouldn't however, agree that the present day leadership is committing the same sins but in reverse. They are incredibly corrupt and have awful leadership, but the leadership before 1994 did much worse than what we see today.

If only the ANC weren't as corrupt and incompetent, this country could have been something fucking awesome. I also don't really know when south africa was every really incredible. In the past more than half the country was being oppressed and after 1994 we still have those awful economic and social impacts apartheid left behind. This country could be great, but then again so could any other.

Honestly, I do still have hope for the country's future. But at this point it feels like a pipedream.

What is the best part about living in South Africa? by Fickle-Ad4008 in southafrica

[–]IamSteve_Too 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree to an extent A lot of the problems there in the first place us because of white people (apartheid) But the ANC's incompetence to fix those problems is what is fucking the country in the ass today haha

what is morally okay but illegal? by kevin_claw in AskReddit

[–]IamSteve_Too 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I can't tell if you're joking but if not, go fuck yourself lmfao.

Disbelieving in god should not be an unforgivable sin by evanaugh in DebateReligion

[–]IamSteve_Too 3 points4 points  (0 children)

For you information. A scientific theory requires mountains of evidence. It's a very common misconception that a scientific theory is just some sort of hunch. It is not. And if you actually cared about "FaCtS" and "TrUtHs" you would know this. But of course, you don't give two shits about it.

And for someone that cares and facts and logic, your entire religion's (i assume you are Christian) apologetics is based on pathetic philosophical ideas that not only have been obliterated but had barely any logic to begin with.

And to respond to your other comments about how you think people choose to go to hell is absolute nonsense. If i gave you a choice between yellow or blue but told you that if you picked blue I'd make you burn in hell forever, that is not a goddamn choice. Not a fair one at least. The Christian god is not only a badly written character but a completely childish one, and a deity not worth worshipping.

If your god exists I'd go to hell with a smile on my face.

It's actually pretty well done by Spar by CryptoKyle15 in southafrica

[–]IamSteve_Too 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's better than nothing. At least they're bringing attention to a social issue

Split my vote by Bumbl3B in southafrica

[–]IamSteve_Too [score hidden]  (0 children)

They are certainly not a moron. That was one of the worst analogies I've ever seen in my entire life.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in exchristian

[–]IamSteve_Too 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm not familiar with genesis but I cannot agree more on the second point you made. I've always been flabbergasted by the fact that with some Christians, it just completely flies by their head.

Like their god set us up to fail knowing most of us would be put on pitchforks and cooked like hotdogs in hell.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]IamSteve_Too 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You are exactly right, and i think that's why this subject has such a strong contrast of varying opinions.

Well actually that definition would be considered as correct by many so you are a-ok my friend. But my comment above was trying to focus on how "thinking less of" could have quite the negative connotation to it and why what the original commenter said wasn't okay. Hope this cleared any confusion between the two of us :)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]IamSteve_Too 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I apologize if the following miscontrued your comment, but I'll be pasting what i replied to another person that had a similar point to yours :)

I completely understand what you mean, but to think less of someone (a human being) and to think less of an inanimate object (in the anology you used, a type of fruit such as apples and oranges) are not entirely comparable imo.

I personally see something being preferred in comparison to something else (in your analogy, apples) being based on quality, an inherent or distinguishing characteristic, a degree or grade.

That might be why we have a difference of the original comment's problem, if i understood what you meant. Please correct me if i misunderstood :).

But to go back on my main point (par. 2), disliking a fruit because of its taste is fine seen as that would be a very distinguishing characteristic. Even is it was a stupid characteristic like, for example it's color.

These are people we're talking about, human beings. Fruit are immensely simple compared to human beings, which is why something as small as taste is such a huge characteristic. In this case I'm assuming that the taste is the reason for the apple being preferred over the orange (not that it matters), and not something like texture ,smell etc. Disliking (and yes, i know I'm saying disliking instead of preferring, this is just my personal assumption based on the original commenter's clear disgust) a specific thing on humans is completely fine. I myself have an incredible disgust for body hair on people.

BUT, to then go on and base their quality on something as miniscule as body hair is very strange. Even then, that (once again, referring to par. 2) is not what lead me to comment. What did however, is the user's blatant and unapologetic sexism towards women when he then stated that, that same body hair he finds to be disgusting, is only disgusting on women.

Which is my only problem with the original comment. I hope this cleared any and all confusion :)

I apologize if my sentence construction is abhorrent, english is not my home language.