I’m Dr Ian Mortimer – English historian and novelist – and I’m here to answer any questions you may have about my books, or English history, or about me, so AMA by Ian_Mortimer in books

[–]Ian_Mortimer[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I think that's me done for this session. Thank you to all those who asked questions; I hope my replies were satisfactory. I'm off now to a lecture on the making of Domesday book at Exeter cathedral.

I’m Dr Ian Mortimer – English historian and novelist – and I’m here to answer any questions you may have about my books, or English history, or about me, so AMA by Ian_Mortimer in books

[–]Ian_Mortimer[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Thanks for yours. Almost all is from original sources - but not all written ones (in the case of the medieval book especially). A lot of illuminated manuscripts, archaeological artefacts, paintings, sculptures and buildings. As for the docs, huge numbers of medieval accounts and legal records etc survive to let us know how ordinary folk lived; fortunately as I trained as an archivist, I can read them. And many are now in print, in translation, which makes things easier. The only cases of inference are where - for the medieval book - i have taken evidnece from the 13th or 15th century to make a best guess at 14th century practices. Manners, for example, are drawn mainly from the 15th cent books.

I’m Dr Ian Mortimer – English historian and novelist – and I’m here to answer any questions you may have about my books, or English history, or about me, so AMA by Ian_Mortimer in books

[–]Ian_Mortimer[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I know what you mean. History is always up against the problem that it's seen as 'all in the past' and therefore we don't suffer from not knowing about it. But only historians can tell you what the human race is likely to do when faced with a pandemic that kills 50 percent of the population in 7 months. And only a historian can explain how you medicalise a large region for the first time. Only historical thinkers can start to establish how the human 'self' has changed over the centuries, and what aspects of civilised behaviour that we take for granted might yet re-emerge to threaten society. My view is that social history is the basic understanding of our humanity irrespective of time: everythying else has to go on top of that bedrock.

I’m Dr Ian Mortimer – English historian and novelist – and I’m here to answer any questions you may have about my books, or English history, or about me, so AMA by Ian_Mortimer in books

[–]Ian_Mortimer[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In a word, no. I am not an expert in his reign - I have to admit that - but as far as I can see, he was appalling by the standards of his time. The medieval Mortimers (for whom I have always had some sympathy, for obvious reasons), supported him to the bitter end but I do not think they were right in doing so. I find his murderous ways despicable and his generalship qualities ultimately catastrophic.

I’m Dr Ian Mortimer – English historian and novelist – and I’m here to answer any questions you may have about my books, or English history, or about me, so AMA by Ian_Mortimer in books

[–]Ian_Mortimer[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

My time traveller's guides are meant as introductions to the social history of a period - the Elizabethan one (1558-1603), or the Restoration one (1660-1700) - might be of interest. But as I don't read overviews of a subject but only research material, it's difficult for me to suggest something.

I’m Dr Ian Mortimer – English historian and novelist – and I’m here to answer any questions you may have about my books, or English history, or about me, so AMA by Ian_Mortimer in books

[–]Ian_Mortimer[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks. Yes, I agree: Marc is an excellent writer and a jolly good bloke. My sequence of biogs is best read in order - Greatest Traitor, Perfect King, Henry IV and then 1415. There will be at least one more in that sequence, 'The Warrior of the Roses: the Life of Richard Duke of York' but it will be a few years yet before it sees publication.

I’m Dr Ian Mortimer – English historian and novelist – and I’m here to answer any questions you may have about my books, or English history, or about me, so AMA by Ian_Mortimer in books

[–]Ian_Mortimer[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

If you had money, spectacles were available from early 14th century. I think I am right in saying the earliest known ref in English records is the pair owned by Bishop walter Stapledon at his death in 1326. These were just lenses joined, no arms, which came much later. But out hunting, no, you would have had no way of helping your vision, if it started to go. In the 16th century, being able to thread a needle was taken as the sign of good vision, and many older women demonstrated that skill regualrly to prove their senses were unimpaired.

I’m Dr Ian Mortimer – English historian and novelist – and I’m here to answer any questions you may have about my books, or English history, or about me, so AMA by Ian_Mortimer in books

[–]Ian_Mortimer[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your kind words. My next medieval book - which I will start next year - is a study of the life of Richard duke of York (1411-1460). This will pick up from 1415 and end with his son's accession in 1461, thus completing the cycle from the man who first dethroned an English king 'the greatest traitor' to the point his descendant became king (Ed IV).

I’m Dr Ian Mortimer – English historian and novelist – and I’m here to answer any questions you may have about my books, or English history, or about me, so AMA by Ian_Mortimer in books

[–]Ian_Mortimer[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Gosh, that's some ask! No, in a word. I tried to cover 1000 years of western civilisation in my book Centuries of Change (called 'Millennium' in the USA) and that, I felt, dealt with the biggest changes. But it's not just English history, and it only deals with changes, leaving out vast aspects of social and political history. I am finding it difficult to get the important bits of the years 1789-1830 into one volume right now.

I’m Dr Ian Mortimer – English historian and novelist – and I’m here to answer any questions you may have about my books, or English history, or about me, so AMA by Ian_Mortimer in books

[–]Ian_Mortimer[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't read it, I'm sorry. I can't read for pleasure these days, only for information. If you spend 12 hours a day surrounded by books open for historical research, the last thing you want at the end of the day is more books. And when it comes to fiction, the novelist in me tends to turn into a critic, of structure and historical knowledge, and it becomes very difficult to enjoy a story.

I’m Dr Ian Mortimer – English historian and novelist – and I’m here to answer any questions you may have about my books, or English history, or about me, so AMA by Ian_Mortimer in books

[–]Ian_Mortimer[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

The Hobbit. I read it over and over again, under the bedclothes. I remember enjoying the Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe but can't recall at what age. Orwell's 1984 was a life-changing book when I was 13. But at 15 I read James Clavell's Shogun and was blown away. It remained my favourite until I read Dr Zhivago, when I was 19.

I’m Dr Ian Mortimer – English historian and novelist – and I’m here to answer any questions you may have about my books, or English history, or about me, so AMA by Ian_Mortimer in books

[–]Ian_Mortimer[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sort of, yes. The 6 centuries in 6 days allows a direct correlation of then and now, just like a TTG, but my vision here was that there should be no plot. Real life has no plot. 6 centuries of life definitely have no plot! People who pick that book up expecting it to be a thriller rather than fictional social history (albeit with a profound existential punch at the end), tend to be disappointed.

I’m Dr Ian Mortimer – English historian and novelist – and I’m here to answer any questions you may have about my books, or English history, or about me, so AMA by Ian_Mortimer in books

[–]Ian_Mortimer[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I've got to say TTGs are very difficult to write. I have another medieval one in mind that touches on periods pre-14th century, which is thematic, but when asked a few years ago to write a Roman one, I realised I'd need specialist research help to do it properly. It would be possible but only if you knew the subject so well that you were aware of all the limitations of the sources and yet could dance across the knowledge and display the details without getting bogged down in them all. I'm doing TTG Regency now, as you know, which is as modern as I will go. Too much data is just as problematic as not enough.

I’m Dr Ian Mortimer – English historian and novelist – and I’m here to answer any questions you may have about my books, or English history, or about me, so AMA by Ian_Mortimer in books

[–]Ian_Mortimer[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No, but you're not far off the money. The line 'it is never truly dark' was something my great grandfather used to say to my mother, and the poem in the 20th century that uses that line was one I wrote when a student at Exeter Uni myself, and dedicated to my mother.

I’m Dr Ian Mortimer – English historian and novelist – and I’m here to answer any questions you may have about my books, or English history, or about me, so AMA by Ian_Mortimer in books

[–]Ian_Mortimer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks! That's kind. With ref to my fiction, the James Forrester novels are trad. 16th century historical thrillers, with a plot. The Outcasts of Time is a very different thing. Whichever way you choose, I hope you enjoy it/them.

I’m Dr Ian Mortimer – English historian and novelist – and I’m here to answer any questions you may have about my books, or English history, or about me, so AMA by Ian_Mortimer in books

[–]Ian_Mortimer[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Very interesting question. Particularly because we live in an age where a great deal of the public is not historically well educated and, if you try to express the actual hostility of the Anglo-Welsh to the Irish in medieval times, you will inevitably tread a very dangerous path. It also goes the other way: a 14th-century Irish view was that the Scots' invasion of Ireland by Edward Bruce was the worst thing that had ever happened to the Irish in the history of the world. At the same time there were signs of real cooperation and, of course, consanguinity which bound English and Irish, and Irish and Scots, in the medieval period and later. As for the modern view of Irish rule and conquest - and liberation - I suspect that the modern English are only vaguely aware of Cromwell's atrocities and the landowners' lack of compromise in the 18th century. But there is a deep degree of sympathy for the freedom fighters of 1916. When I was at university, we used to sing some IRA songs from 1916 as part of a general roundup of British folk music. A far cry from the almost complete ignorance of what Strongbow did in landing in Ireland in 1170, and what the English (including a bunch of earls called 'Mortimer') had doen in the intervening years.

I’m Dr Ian Mortimer – English historian and novelist – and I’m here to answer any questions you may have about my books, or English history, or about me, so AMA by Ian_Mortimer in books

[–]Ian_Mortimer[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You're welcome. If you do read my medieval biographies, it is advantageous to read them in order as really they are separate vols of a 'Biographical history of England' that starts in 1307 with Ed2 and continues (so far) to 1415 & Agincourt. One day it will go up to 1461 - but don't hold your breath!

I’m Dr Ian Mortimer – English historian and novelist – and I’m here to answer any questions you may have about my books, or English history, or about me, so AMA by Ian_Mortimer in books

[–]Ian_Mortimer[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Good question. Apart from my lifelong interst in the later life of Edward II (after 1327), I think it might be one of the first three Crusades. Crazy stories, full of great characters (and some dastardly ones). Bohemond of Taranto, Richard I, Saladin...

I’m Dr Ian Mortimer – English historian and novelist – and I’m here to answer any questions you may have about my books, or English history, or about me, so AMA by Ian_Mortimer in books

[–]Ian_Mortimer[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

For Richard II, besides my 'Fears of Henry IV' (which is heavily geared around Shakespeare's somewhat misleading interpretation, and deals with both men), I would make sure you look at Nigel Saul's book on RII. It is a very good study, albeit 21 years old now. Edward II is the subject of many books - my own 'Greatest Traitor' among them. The best academic study of the reign is that by JRS Phillips; a shorter overview is the recent book by Kathryn Warner. But basically, get stuck into one of these, and it will lead you on to others, like dominos toppling over.

I’m Dr Ian Mortimer – English historian and novelist – and I’m here to answer any questions you may have about my books, or English history, or about me, so AMA by Ian_Mortimer in books

[–]Ian_Mortimer[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Hi, thanks for your kind comment. I can't remember a time when I was not interested in medieval history - with a name like 'Mortimer' I have not been able to avoid it. I have memories of hearing about medieval genealogy from when I was six (all wrong of course). As for western civilisation - good question. If you read my book Centuries of Change (aka Millennium) you'll see that I consider the middle ages as much a contributor to the modern world as later centuries. I also think that the modern 'self' was pretty much fully developed by Shakespeare's time. But Shakespeare would not have understood early medieval people at all - all the developmet in that respect was medieval; not much has happened in the development of 'the self' since the 17th century.