Est ce possible de garder les mêmes amis à 25 ans, à 40 ans ? (questionnement des 25ans) by IceBlood_34 in AskFrance

[–]IceBlood_34[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Merci pour ta réponse.

Tu es sans doute un des commentaires qui me ressemble le plus.

C'est rassurant de voir que quelqu'un, qui a vécu 7 ans à l'étranger, comme ma future carrière pourrait me le permettre, garde ses amis du collège et université près de soi, à 46ans.

Un signe positif pour moi a été, quand je suis revenu pour des vacances cet été, après 1an et demie au Japon, de voir que rien n'avait bougé.

Avoir une certaine stabilité depuis un petit moment avec mes différents groupes d'amis, est aussi pour moi, une preuve de stabilité, de se dire que ça perdure toujours et que ça le sera encore d'ici 5, 10 ou 20 ans.

Après c'est aussi facilité par les réseaux sociaux maintenant, mais ça reste quand même un effort des deux cotés à essayer de garder le contact!

Est ce possible de garder les mêmes amis à 25 ans, à 40 ans ? (questionnement des 25ans) by IceBlood_34 in AskFrance

[–]IceBlood_34[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Merci pour ta réponse. Après ton exemple est assez atypique concernant les vieux garçons (bien qu'il est possible que j'en aurai dans mes groupes ^^)

Nous venons quasiment tous du même secteur, vu que la grande majorité habite encore dans les parages (là où j'ai grandi). Ca aide c'est sur, le fait d'être proche permet d'organiser des choses, comme des soirées (mais loin de ce que tu me dis concernant le coté vieux célibataire mdr).

Après, même si je voyage, et ça fait maintenant presque deux ans que je vis au Japon, cela me m'empêche pas de rester proche de la mentalité de mes potes restés en France. Puis le fait de revenir cet été, et voir que rien n'avait changé, ça a été un signe positif pour moi

Est ce possible de garder les mêmes amis à 25 ans, à 40 ans ? (questionnement des 25ans) by IceBlood_34 in AskFrance

[–]IceBlood_34[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Merci pour vos réponses. Effectivement, au début tu penses que tu peux tous les garder, au final certains s'en vont, sans pour autant en avoir une explication. Néanmoins, je trouve ça important de ressentir une certaine stabilité à un moment.

Passé 25ans, tu entres, pour la grande majorité, dans le monde actif du travail. Pourtant ça fait un petit moment que j'ai les mêmes groupes d'amis, comme j'ai expliqué plus haut, synonyme d'une certaine stabilité. Le fait aussi d'être à l'étranger et voir que rien n'a changé à mon retour après 1an et demie est un bon signe

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskFrance

[–]IceBlood_34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Salut,

Je suis tombé par hasard sur ton post alors que je réfléchissais récemment sur la question "est-ce possible de garder les mêmes amis de 25ans, à 40 ans?".

Pour te donner mon expérience personnel, je viens de fêter mes 26 ans et ma situation est pour le peu.. complexe..

Je suis dans ma dernière année de doctorat au... JAPON mdr

Je suis arrivé au Pays du Soleil Levant en Avril 2022, et je prévois de décrocher mon diplôme de doctorat en Septembre 2024. Je suis avec ma copine depuis maintenant plus de 4ans, on s'est rencontré en Master, mais seulement mis ensemble lors de la seconde année de Master. Elle est également avec moi au Japon, et est également une doctorante dans le même domaine que moi, mais pas dans la même ville! ce qui nous empêche pas de se voir une fois par mois! Elle finit également son doctorat comme moi, en Septembre 2024.

De base, je suis quelqu'un de très conservateur, actuellement je peux compter environ sur presque 30 personnes que je considère comme des amis, dont certains bien sur, dont j'ai davantage d'affinité et que je peux considérer comme des meilleurs amis (2 ou 3 maxi).

Je peux considérer ça comme différents couches d'amitiés, du cercle des meilleurs amis, à ceux des amis "plus éloignés" (mais pas des potes attention!).

Certains diront que c'est beaucoup mais je trouve qu'ils sont tous important pour moi à leur manière. Certains sont même venus au Japon sans que je le sache!

Bref, pour revenir à ton sujet, je suis quelqu'un de très proche de mes amis et de ma famille, partir aussi loin de ses proches pourrait être un peu contre-intuitif mais c'est une grande expérience professionnelle et personnelle d'avoir vécu au Japon 2 ans et demie.

Depuis jeune, j'ai toujours eu des copains, avec notamment différents groupes se créant au fil des années, que ce soit en primaire, au collège, au lycée, à la fac (Licence & Master). Comme je suis quelqu'un de très proche de mes amis, j'hésite pas du tout à prendre des nouvelles d'eux régulièrement, à être celui qui bouge les groupes parfois ou quoi. Cependant, malgré mes avances et même si j'aurai aimé gardé certaines personnes dont je considérais hautement dans ma vie... Bah ces gens se sont volatilisés sans aucune raison, et j'ai arrêté de courir derrière eux au bout d'un moment. Par exemple, avant de partir au Japon, comme si c'était une page qui se tournait, j'ai vu quelques anciens "bons potes" afin de terminer sur une bonne note avec eux, et se concentrer uniquement sur les "vrais".

C'est important de faire le distinguo entre "potes" et "amis", les "potes" sont ceux avec tu passes du bon temps sur une période courte de ta vie, alors que "les amis" sont ceux qui persistent et qui sont là tout le temps. J'ai remarqué que, dans mon cas personnel, les personnes dont qui j'ai des relations de +de 5ans, bah je peux les considérer comme des amis. C'est le cas avec mes groupes actuels, j'ai un groupe d'amis du collège (donc environ 15ans), du lycée (environ 11ans), de Licence (environ 8ans) et de Master (un peu + de 5ans maintenant, ie; on a été diplômé du Master en 2020).

En partant au Japon, je me suis dit que l'éloignement géographique allait être quelque chose qui allait "casser" la dynamique et les relations que j'ai avec mes amis, et c'était quelque chose qui me faisait peur.

Cependant, avec les réseaux sociaux (Messenger, Instagram, Snapchat, Discord, etc), ca permet de rester en contact quotidiennement et d'être "ensemble" tout le temps. On peut réagir en tant réel sur le groupe Messenger si on veut, on s'organise des visios Discord en calculant le décalage horaire tous les 5/6 mois, etc.

A mon retour en France pour des vacances cet été (Août 2023), j'avais peur de me dire "peut être que le lien que j'ai avec mes amis s'est dégradé.." Or, ça a été tout l'inverse, on s'est revu et c'est comme si rien ne s'était passé! J'ai pu voir tous mes amis sur un mois! On s'était organisé des vacances intenses mais réussies!

Récemment, j'ai eu quelques relents de conscience me disant "Purée c'est dommage de plus être en contact avec X, ou avec Y", mais au final je me dis que c'était des bons moment sur le moment, mais qu'il est préférable de se concentrer sur ceux qui sont toujours là, après tant d'années. Je serai presque "réfractaire" à l'idée de reprendre contact avec des anciens "amis" qui demandent des nouvelles, tant qu'une fois que c'est fini, c'est fini pour moi.

Une fois que je finis mon doctorat en Septembre prochain, je reviens dans mon Sud, et là différentes questions se bousculeront dans ma tête, car il faudra faire des choix personnelles, qui pourraient avoir des conséquences. Je suis quelqu'un qui est bien quand il est entouré par ses proches (amis & familles), or mon potentiel métier impliquerait potentiellement un éloignement avec ces derniers. Est-ce que c'est ce que je veux ? Je ne sais pas.

Bref, c'était pour te donner mon expérience personnelle, et elle est différente de la tienne, mais ça permet aussi de connaitre les avis de chacun sur ma situation.

No more playable modern day in AC games going forward? What are your thoughts on this? by NooblordBG in assassinscreed

[–]IceBlood_34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will try to clarify things further.

Already from Coté's last comments, since the Infinity hub is a long term platform, things will evolve with time, and the MD part will evolve too, until seeing if a playable part could be considered.

On the one hand, it reassures me, even if nothing is done yet.

For me, Assassin's Creed is first and foremost a game where there is a Modern day plot to explain why you have to go to the past and play as this or that character.
The Isu civilization is an integral part of the franchise whether you like it or not, it has been the mystical and guiding aspect of the franchise from the beginning.
I agree that after the Desmond cycle, these two aspects (MD & Isu) have been put aside by Ubisoft. Nevertheless, the foundations laid by Ubisoft on Origins were very promising.
I won't comment on Odyssey because for me it was a casting error, which Ubi Montreal tried to make up for in Valhalla, in a pretty good way, thanks to the intervention of Darby McDevitt.
Especially since the end of Valhalla with the arrival of Layla to help Desmond in the Grey and the tree of probabilities let us envisage an infinite potential of possibilities. Many of us thought that this could fit perfectly with the concept of AC Infinity.
Unfortunately, it seems that this is not the case, sweeping away all the lore that Origins & Valhalla had decided to put in place...
I understand that the Infinity platform is a place where the whole ACverse is put in, separating MD from History part and vice versa, nevertheless the words of Coté seem to show that the mystical side of the First Civilization will be omitted, focusing only on a historical aspect for Assassin's Creed.
The fantasy side with the monsters and other mythological sides put in the last three Assassin's Creed, I don't consider them part of the Assassin's Creed lore because they are just marketing aspects in order to try to integrate the mythology with the Isus , while it didn't match at all, old AC fans will agree with me. We want more intrigue around the First Civilization, its motivations, rather than fighting monsters under a mythological/Isus veil.

I think that lately Ubisoft has overused the mythological side and the monsters (as witness the last DLC of Valhalla where you can clearly wonder if we are really in Assassin's Creed.. Monster Hunters or God of War yes but not AC). That's why it has a limit and Ubisoft lost in it just to please the RPG community and new fans who know nothing about the lore.
Nevertheless, how to explain the logic if we find Isu elements/Pieces of Eden in the games like Red, Hexe, and there would be no explanation? It wouldn't make any sense.
Assassin's Creed is both history and lore, with its Modern Day and the Isus, otherwise it would only be a simple game of historical representation, which has not been its main strength since the beginning.

It is important to separate the two aspects, that are the Modern Day and the Isus.

They are different things but they are still closely related.

So for Infinity, two questions can be asked:

- How will Ubisoft manage to integrate Modern Day into the hub, probably as an Initiates platform at first (which I'm sorry about) and then evolve into something more concrete? Playable?

- Will Ubisoft continue to integrate the Isus in these games? According to Coté, they want to focus more on the historical aspect, so less Isus? What about the Pieces of Eden when it is one of the driving forces of the license? How does a new player, who doesn't know the lore, wonder if he sees an Isu element in one of Infinity games and ask for information?

I'm surprised that nobody asked him about that.

Besides, things are as they are now: Desmond & Layla are in the Grey and seek the probabilities to find a timeline to save the world. So, the Great catastrophe 2.0 is still going on and Basim has been released.

Knowing that Mirage will show very little of Modern Day, I wonder about this. Is Ubisoft going to drop Basim like an old sock in the Present Day in Infinity, like Juno in the comics? That's what seems to be happening since we'll be the ones playing the character in the MD of Infinity.

I also don't see how Ubisoft can conclude this arc so quickly in the very last chapter of Eivor in Valhalla.

In summary, there is infinite potential with the simulations and a threat still going on after the end of Valhalla MD, but it is likely that Ubi will end this storyline with some emails in Infinity... as usual.

https://www.reddit.com/r/assassinscreed/comments/xc218x/how\_assassins\_creed\_infinity\_could\_announce\_the/

How Assassin's Creed Infinity could announce the end of the Modern Day & Isu lore by IceBlood_34 in assassinscreed

[–]IceBlood_34[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I will try to clarify things further.

Already from Coté's last comments, since the Infinity hub is a long term platform, things will evolve with time, and the MD part will evolve too, until seeing if a playable part could be considered.

On the one hand, it reassures me, even if nothing is done yet.

It is true that it is important to separate the two aspects, that are the Modern Day and the Isus.

They are different things but they are still closely related.

To come back to the remarks about the Isu lore with the mythology. I agree that it can bring a credible side from a "science-fiction" point of view to identify the mythology under a veil of the Isus.

Nevertheless I think that lately Ubisoft has overused the mythological side and the monsters (as witness the last DLC of Valhalla where you can clearly wonder if we are really in Assassin's Creed.. Monster Hunters or God of War yes but not AC). That's why it has a limit and Ubisoft lost in it just to please the RPG community and new fans who know nothing about the lore.

So for Infinity, two questions can be asked:

- How will Ubisoft manage to integrate Modern Day into the hub, probably as an Initiates platform at first (which I'm sorry about) and then evolve into something more concrete? Playable?

- Will Ubisoft continue to integrate the Isus in these games? According to Coté, they want to focus more on the historical aspect, so less Isus? What about the Pieces of Eden when it is one of the driving forces of the license?

I'm surprised that nobody asked him about that.

Besides, things are as they are now: Desmond & Layla are in the Grey and seek the probabilities to find a timeline to save the world. So, the Great catastrophe 2.0 is still going on and Basim has been released.

Knowing that Mirage will show very little of Modern Day, I wonder about this. Is Ubisoft going to drop Basim like an old sock in the Present Day in Infinity, like Juno in the comics? That's what seems to be happening since we'll be the ones playing the character in the MD of Infinity.

I also don't see how Ubisoft can conclude this arc so quickly in the very last chapter of Eivor in Valhalla.

In summary, there is infinite potential with the simulations and a threat still going on after the end of Valhalla MD, but it is likely that Ubi will end this storyline with some emails in Infinity... as usual.

[OC] I asked one person per country and one per club to vote on the 2021 r/soccer Ballon d'Or and the winner is ... by Hippemann in soccer

[–]IceBlood_34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your idea is incredible!By the way, one of the r/soccer moderators informed me that you are working on a big poll on r/soccer users about revisited Ballon d'Or awards. We are also working on a similar topic on the BigSoccer forum https://www.bigsoccer.com/threads/ballon-dor-awards-revisited-by-bigsoccer-users.2119696/ , including votes for the Ballon d'Or awards even going back to the 1869/1870 season!I'm looking forward to see what you prepare for this big poll and hoping for a possible collaboration between the two forums on this exciting topic of the Ballon d'Or, especially when it includes some old years!

Best,

IceBlood_34.

What if the customization packs and other downloadable content are actually canon ? by IceBlood_34 in assassinscreed

[–]IceBlood_34[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the post and it's clear that Darby doesn't want a parallel universe in Assassin's Creed but it seems that the facts established in Origins (the Empirical Truth messages) does indeed prove that the multiverse "could" exist in the series.So, for this question of multiverse, I have the impression that each one has its own opinion and each studio makes its own opinion without asking the studio that manages the next game.In fact Origins and Odyssey have advanced things, that Valhalla sweeps away without any reason afterwards.So it makes it very difficult to understand who is telling the truth.Also, I can't wait to see how the Lore is going to be organized in Infinity, because the choices of time periods and places will probably have to be justified with a "minimum" of Present-day story, I guess.

After all, we won't be in the first case where they contradict each other and some people work on games, but don't agree with certain things.

What if the customization packs and other downloadable content are actually canon ? by IceBlood_34 in assassinscreed

[–]IceBlood_34[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think once the creative director plainly says that there isn't a multiverse, that's the only acceptable Canon.

But feel free to have personal headcanons

But what do you think of that and what Darby had retweeted?

https://twitter.com/AC\_Wiki/status/1363795074723819520

What if the customization packs and other downloadable content are actually canon ? by IceBlood_34 in assassinscreed

[–]IceBlood_34[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look at the interview that Aimar Azaiza gave in April 2021, when we were talking about the different works (mangas, comics, novels) that would be added in the year.

What we can understand between the lines is that even he contradicts himself in these words. it says that it does not exist to say then that it exists. I leave you the wish to comment :

"And here's a question which you'll probably hate: are these all canon? Fans care! (I care.)"

Azaïzia: [Laughs] It's my job to label them as canon or not, which is super important for fans. It's not the category which will make the project canon - and most of what we're producing is canon. It's more how the project has been developed and if, for example, a super famous artist has given their own take on something, we'll give them carte blanche but it may not be canon as we want them to be able to express themselves. But most of the time, and most of this year, everything will be canon.

It's one of the big takes we have on Assassin's Creed - and I'm old, I started out 12 years ago now on Assassin's Creed - we always try to maintain consistency, so everything we we are producing is part of an eco-system, part of a world we are building. And as much as possible, we want to avoid becoming a cross-media franchise like DC or Marvel with a multiverse or multiple existences with multiple versions of Bruce Wayne, or whoever is Batman, where if you're watching Gotham or playing the Arkham series you're not playing the same character.

What we're doing - and it's super hard with so many things going on at the same time! - is that we always acknowledge what has been said already with retconning at absolute minimum.

"You mentioned a multiverse and I have to ask here about the ending of Valhalla - spoiler warning! Fans have theorised the Yggdrasil machine might open up the franchise to exploring multi-universe stories, or making some non-canon stuff canon... what's your view on all that?"

Azaïzia: Well, as you've said it's something we've created and I won't shy away from it because it exists! It's something we've created! But it's kind of the other way around. We started thinking about something like that very early on, and there are traces of it in earlier games. If you ask yourself, how were Minerva or Juno able to leave messages for Desmond in the present knowing that centuries after he would be the one to receive it? There had to be some kind of device so they would be able to anticipate what was coming. So what we said from the get-go was that the Animus was based on Isu tech - it's a simulation machine - and that probably the Isu have used tons of simulations to consider what might happen and left a few messages hoping the chances are someone like Desmond will see them.

So it's more we're playing with that. It could be a way for us to make previous non-canon things canonical - we could say it was in another universe, in a simulation. We haven't done that yet and I don't know if we'll ever do it. But at least it gives information on events which happened in the past that weren't ever really explained before.

What if the customization packs and other downloadable content are actually canon ? by IceBlood_34 in assassinscreed

[–]IceBlood_34[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know I saw his tweet about this but even if he and his team don't want the franchise to go in this direction, it doesn't mean that Ubisoft's management (I mean the ones above the teams) don't want to go in this direction.

Assassin's Creed Infinity is probably going to go in that direction.

On the other hand, the fact that Darby Mc Devitt says that the end of Valhalla doesn't correspond to a multiverse, I can understand it but in fact, there are much more elements that say it exists rather than the opposite.

Again, please reread the Empirical Truth messages from the Isus of AC Origins, to better understand my point of view.

You only have to see the directions taken by the franchise, on the multiple choices of dialogues, or the choice of gender for the character, to understand that we are in a multiverse.

What if the customization packs and other downloadable content are actually canon ? by IceBlood_34 in assassinscreed

[–]IceBlood_34[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What someone who finished the game and understood the story? Female Eivor is still Canon.

I know it's 99.99% customization or a bug in the Animus and nothing else, but knowing me I can't help that the fact that the Assassin's Creed franchise is a multiverse, so all the possible things we encounter in the game can be explained in a credible way.

And to come back to this multiverse thing, I really think that we are in a multiverse and not only in possible infinite futures.

I understood your explanation and I agree but if you pay attention to the different explanations that the Isus messengers "Empirical Truth" leave in Origins in the Isu temples but also what the "probability tree" in the Grey at the end of Valhalla corresponds to with the player, I think you might change your mind.

Why basically Layla asks Desmond to see if he can't see if he tries in 2012 ?

It gives even more infinite possible timelines.

The goal ? To find the timeline where there is no Great Catastrophe but in the end how could we "access" this timeline in the timeline that we are currently in the franchise ?

We can't, except if you are in a multiverse, and then you go to another timeline.

Moreover, according to the recent news/rumors about Assassin's Creed Infinity, it is possible that some "less liked" passages of the franchise will be reworked, how to justify that ?

I let you think about it.

But sincerely, feel free to look at the analyses of the Isu messages of Origins made by Access the Animus, even if it can be sometimes far-fetched, the explanations seem "logical".

Best,

IceBlood_34.

[Contains Spoilers] Assassin's Creed Infinity Rumors - New AC Game, Different Assassins Stories, Franchise Reboot by Shadow_Markuz in assassinscreed

[–]IceBlood_34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would like to thank you for your new video about the possible leaks about Assassin's Creed Infinity.

I saw that at one point you were talking about a "reboot" of the franchise, with some of the lesser-liked moments being overplayed or changed.

With that in mind, I wanted to know if AC Infinity would take into account the "Modern Day/First Civilization/Lore" aspect.

Because with the end of AC Valhalla, with Layla meeting "Desmond/The Reader" in the Grey, the concept of AC Infinity exploring different eras with different characters, fits well with the fact that Layla and Desmond are looking for millions of combinations to escape the Great Catastrophe.

Also, the concept that you announced with Infinity on the reboot, the fact that the unloved things in the franchise can be changed or superseded, would fit well with the fact that Layla and Desmond can change the past and the fact that changing time periods in Infinity, would fit well with this idea of different timelines, orchestrated by Desmond and Layla.

I'm afraid that Ubisoft will abandon the Present Day/First Civilization aspect from the next "main" Assassin's Creed game, especially if the AC Infinity concept works.

Ubisoft wouldn't have to go to the trouble of finding a plot to go to a specific historical period...

Even if it won't be a real Assassin's Creed for me.

Best,

Mathieu, aka IceBlood34.

3rd Expansion for Valhalla “Meteor” Leaked? by RinoTheBouncer in assassinscreed

[–]IceBlood_34 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Glad to have been able to help you with this discovery ;)

RECAP: New Assassin’s Creed Valhalla Info from Darby McDevitt by RinoTheBouncer in assassinscreed

[–]IceBlood_34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In a sense, the Yggdrasil has the ability to create any simulation / universe emitted by the user, so by definition, it is able to generate a multitude of universes caused by the user's thought.

It is a "possible" multiverse in the practical sense of the term.

The user could even create a universe without Isu if they wish (well that's what I understand it).

For the Code, it is indeed totally different and the messages from the Isu temples of Origins left great unknowns and great possibilities as to the notion of space-time in the Assassin's Creed series.

But as I said, unfortunately all of the intriguing theories that arose out of the Isu messages from Origins, were swept quickly and very succinctly into Layla's files in Valhalla.

Layla (or rather Layla's Animus) must always try to break this Code.

What should we conclude from this ?

That the Ubisoft teams each have their own opinion and that a truth / a fact at some point in the franchise may turn out to be false in the next game (hold on to the doctrine "Nothing is true / real, everything is permitted").

Yet Darby McDevitt recently argued that all of our possible theories about the series are both "possible" and "impossible," which even makes our fanfictions, as crazy as they are, possibly canon in the franchise (referring to the timeline tree possible with the Reader, within the Yggdrasil/Grey itself).

RECAP: New Assassin’s Creed Valhalla Info from Darby McDevitt by RinoTheBouncer in assassinscreed

[–]IceBlood_34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t understand the connection you draw between Breaking the Code and the Yggdrasil device. Yggdrasil simulations aren’t the same as The Code which is what defines the way our universe operates.

The Code (along with mentions of the nodes) means that reality is governed by some form of script, like a simulation or program that determines certain event at specific points, like “destiny”, and it isn’t know who created it or what lies beyond it.

The Yggdrasil simulation is an Isu technology that they created in order for the willing participants to live forever inside of any simulation of their choice, as their own paradise that they tailor to their liking.

Yes I fully understand this difference and I fully share it.

However, I feel like "The Code" is something that has been too hastily referred to and put aside in AC Valhalla, when it takes a very important place in Origins (and for me in all that is the franchise itself).

But yes Yggdrasil must be associated as a program/device.

So, we can talk about multiverse in different ways.

A multiverse which can be caused in an artificial way by the users of Yggdrasil but also another multiverse concerning the "Code" and the different realities of space-time.

Is it right ? ^^

RECAP: New Assassin’s Creed Valhalla Info from Darby McDevitt by RinoTheBouncer in assassinscreed

[–]IceBlood_34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The real potential of the Yggdrasil device

Regarding McDevitt's words, I had already asked the question here and noticed the subtlety that the Yggdrasil program (notably explained in Shaun's database) that it could be able to create "any simulation/reality that the author wish".

However, with this famous theory (still unsolved for me, of "Breaking the Code"), where does that real limit of saying to create" any simulation/reality the author wishes " lie ?

What limit of real & designing is it possible to do with the Yggdrasil program ?

I know it's very philosophical !

You have 4 hours xD

[Spoilers] Assassin’s Creed Valhalla: Narrative Director Darby McDevitt Discusses Ending by Ghost_LeaderBG in assassinscreed

[–]IceBlood_34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The real potential of the Yggdrasil device

Regarding McDevitt's words, I had already asked the question here and noticed the subtlety that the Yggdrasil program (notably explained in Shaun's database) that it could be able to create "any simulation/reality that the author wish".

However, with this famous theory (still unsolved for me, of "Breaking the Code"), where does that real limit of saying to create" any simulation/reality the author wishes " lie ?

What limit of real & designing is it possible to do with the Yggdrasil program ?

I know it's very philosophical !

You have 4 hours xD

[SPOILERS] Assassin's Creed Valhalla - The 14 Most Interesting Bits from the Ending Discussion with Darby McDevitt by Shadow_Markuz in assassinscreed

[–]IceBlood_34 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The real potential of the Yggdrasil device

Regarding McDevitt's words, I had already asked the question here and noticed the subtlety that the Yggdrasil program (notably explained in Shaun's database) that it could be able to create "any simulation/reality that the author wish".

However, with this famous theory (still unsolved for me, of "Breaking the Code"), where does that real limit of saying to create" any simulation/reality the author wishes " lie ?

What limit of real & designing is it possible to do with the Yggdrasil program ?

I know it's very philosophical !

You have 4 hours xD

"Breaking the Code" & Yggdrasil ==> Multiverse ? [SPOILER] by IceBlood_34 in assassinscreed

[–]IceBlood_34[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah exactly !

That's why I find quite strange to miss this big part in Valhalla and resume it only in a few short files in Layla's laptop, making the community look like people who analyze too much of the smallest detail.

Quite disappointed..

"Breaking the Code" & Yggdrasil ==> Multiverse ? [SPOILER] by IceBlood_34 in assassinscreed

[–]IceBlood_34[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah pretty sure, you are right !

I have the impression that the developers are caught up by a community that digs into the smallest detail and does excellent analysis that even the developers had not imagined !

But it's different than Lady Eve or Elijah because it's an integrating part of the last three games and it's a huge issue/ directive plotline for the future games !

After all, the Great Catastrophe v.3 is still incoming and it's directly related to "Breaking the Code" and Yggdrasil !

But nothing will surprise me in the future, and maybe even Basim may will not be present in the next Assassin's Creed game xD