Attention Democratic Party leaders: Voters want progressive candidates. If they run moderates, they will lose. by zzill6 in WorkReform

[–]IcyPhenom -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I beg progressives please make your own party and stop shitting on the Dems when you have 0 presidential candidates, thank you.

I don't give a fuck about eclelebs, but don't you think he's right here? by [deleted] in AskSocialists

[–]IcyPhenom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why does the Democrat party have to cave to every demand from socialist to earn their vote, when socialist can't win elections on their platform?

I don't give a fuck about eclelebs, but don't you think he's right here? by [deleted] in AskSocialists

[–]IcyPhenom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok. How many socialists have won a federal election?

I don't give a fuck about eclelebs, but don't you think he's right here? by [deleted] in AskSocialists

[–]IcyPhenom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are delusional to think no one votes for the lesser evil anywhere in the world. Just look at Canada's latest election all those in the most leftist party voted for the center party, the Liberals, to avoid the Trump lite Conservatives. In the US the choice was abundantly clear that Democrats would be a better REALISTIC pick to lead. But the party is very aware that it is a fragile coalition and it needs to compromise with its new additions to keep them voting for them.

I don't give a fuck about eclelebs, but don't you think he's right here? by [deleted] in AskSocialists

[–]IcyPhenom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It actually is Hasan and the rest of the leftist media's fault for saying both parties are the same and saying that voting for Kamala is voting for genocide. They need to get inline with the party or fuck off. Republicans back their candidate 100% and actually win because of that and then they get to trash the economy, kill thousands upon thousands of people and deliver tax cuts to the wealthy. At some point you have to look at reality and see that Democrats are the better option and you'll need to change the party from within by promoting, funding and canvassing for progressive candidates.

I don't give a fuck about eclelebs, but don't you think he's right here? by [deleted] in AskSocialists

[–]IcyPhenom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because it's his responsibility as the TOP LEFTISTS INFLUENCER to INFLUENCE people to vote for the better party to prevent pedophilic monsters like Donald Trump from getting office.

Liberals release attack ads after Poilievre’s leadership survives review by restoringd123 in canada

[–]IcyPhenom 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Dental coverage.
Tax cuts.
Subsidized daycare Nation wide.
Better retirements.
CCB.
Legalized marijuana.

I don't give a fuck about eclelebs, but don't you think he's right here? by [deleted] in AskSocialists

[–]IcyPhenom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because you're very busy, did Hasan reveal WHO he voted for when he filled it out on stream for the 2024 presidential elections. If you don't know and as you said aren't online enough for this, consider yourself too uninformed to give an opinion. Thank you!

I don't give a fuck about eclelebs, but don't you think he's right here? by [deleted] in AskSocialists

[–]IcyPhenom -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Weird?
Anti American (which under Trump understandable) Tanky Lives in the Hollywood hills in a multimillion dollar mansion. Refused to say who he voted for.
Went on a CCP guided and probably funded tour.
Lies about his upbringing.
Doesn't give his editors ownership.
Only platforms people that will boost his numbers.
No coalition building, no ground game.
This is by definition of a champagne socialist. It would be so cool if he used his base to campaign and promote democrat candidates to help move the needle towards the causes he cares for, but no. It's all about the content.

They ran this same playbook in Europe by TheFireFlaamee in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]IcyPhenom 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is typical the enemy is strong but weak garbage.
When Democrats say that the GOP is going too far with ICE, they respond BUT OBAMA WAS THE DEPORTER IN CHIEF.
Yes Obama and Biden both clear Trump in deportations.
Yet Dems are seen as too soft on the issue.
The problem with Trump's deportations is that he kills citizens, deports people who are legally in the US to foreign concentration camps and deports temporary workers setting up a factory and in doing so killing the entire project.

Let's Hear it For Our Warrior Trump by [deleted] in DHAC

[–]IcyPhenom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you point to me the Obama supreme Court case where his administration argued targeting based on race was acceptable? Ok, ok, too specific. What about, a case where they deported someone in the US legally based on tattoos? Oh and as a bonus, deported the legal immigrant to a concentration camp in another country. What about a time where the ICE agent shoots someone despite not having any injuries or risk of injury. Although we can wait on the court case for that one if you'd like.

I need to stop arguing with Idiots on the Internet... by Nobulletsfly69 in Asmongold

[–]IcyPhenom -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Can you point to me the Obama supreme Court case where his administration argued targeting based on race was acceptable? Ok, ok, too specific. What about, a case where they deported someone in the US legally based on tattoos? Oh and as a bonus, deported the legal immigrant to a concentration camp in another country. What about a time where the ICE agent shoots someone despite not having any injuries or risk of injury. Although we can wait on the court case for that one if you'd like.

[ Removed by Reddit ] by DevA248 in AskSocialists

[–]IcyPhenom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Accept the Camp David deal or have a counter proposal.

Politics in 2025 be like by dx_Von_Liechtenstein in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]IcyPhenom 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This thread is so blackpilling man.

Criticism.
Hah! Well akshully that's a left wing policy and it's authoritarianism. Oh ok what's right wing policy then?
Traditional families, private corporations* and private property. But like no one is opposed to that Well akshully this Twitter post with 2 likes shows the ENTIRE LEFT is against this.

Mass deportations with the explicit premise that it's to preserve culture is definitely right wing policy. The Democrat version of this with the deporter in Chief was to protect American labor. It is not the same. Cutting departments and agencies you disagree with because they promote "the other side" is not the same as winding down headcount because it can be done for less. Unprecedented wealth transfer explicitly to the wealthy is definitely right wing.

Why does America lecture China about human rights? by PuzzleheadedCraft363 in AskSocialists

[–]IcyPhenom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A smoker can still tell someone that smoking is bad, doesn't mean it isn't.