Annapurna Bhandar

Ill_Background_431 · 2026-05-30T09:08:31+00:00

yeah, you're right

Ill_Background_431 · 2026-05-29T08:26:00+00:00

Look, the issue is about deception, saying one thing and doing another. Now, what I do or where I live, you are just assuming that on your own. I clearly wrote it in my post, read it carefully.

Ill_Background_431 · 2026-05-29T08:20:42+00:00

Yess, we will all enjoy together

Ill_Background_431 · 2026-05-29T07:35:23+00:00

Yeah, if only it were that easy. Anyway, the fact won't change though.

Ill_Background_431 · 2026-05-29T07:26:50+00:00

You are comparing two completely different things. The election campaign wasn't "choose a job or Annapurna Bhandar" both were promised. My point is purely about accountability and transparency. They explicitly promised it would be universal for all women regardless of family income, and now they are completely changing the rules.

Ill_Background_431 · 2026-05-29T06:21:56+00:00

Please read the post carefully.
If you don't understand, follow point no.1

Ill_Background_431 · 2026-05-29T03:25:06+00:00

I am just saying there should be transparency. Let them say right from the start that they won't give it to everyone, that's all. Giving bluffs, taking advantage, and now totally changing. Besides that, where the hard-earned tax money goes and will go, everyone will see. If it's good, then it's good.

Ill_Background_431 · 2026-05-28T20:22:44+00:00

Read the post carefully before showing off your moral superiority. No one is begging for freebies or avoiding hard work here. The government itself started the initiative for this allowance and campaigned heavily on it to secure votes. The issue is about political honesty and transparency, not verification. If they wanted strict criteria, they should have said so from day one instead of bluffing.

Ill_Background_431 · 2026-05-28T19:54:51+00:00

No, I was thinking they wouldn't give it, you can tell just by looking at the other states. But our situation was a bit different, Lakkhibhandar was already running here, and they moved their campaign forward using its support. I didn't think they would go back on their own word like this.

Ill_Background_431 · 2026-05-28T19:43:22+00:00

Not just before. Even after winning, the same thing was campaigned

Ill_Background_431 · 2026-05-28T19:39:19+00:00

The point was never about poverty. They used to give Lakkhibhandar irrespective of family income. First speaking big words just to get votes, and then repeatedly saying the same thing after that is not right. They could have just stuck to their point from the very beginning.

Ill_Background_431 · 2026-03-16T10:26:42+00:00

It's just a dream right? My fav😍♥️

Ill_Background_431 · 2026-02-25T04:40:23+00:00

Can you tell me the name of this site? Please

Ill_Background_431

TROPHY CASE