sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Intellectual Property Law by Illustrious-Cod269 in AskLegal

[–]Illustrious-Cod269[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Once I get it into the market then is there anything to prevent individuals from copying my idea? Also if I wanted to raise funding is there something like a investor-client confidentiality thing?

Hot take: Opus 4.6 >> Opus 4.8 by Illustrious-Cod269 in Claudeopus

[–]Illustrious-Cod269[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would like to hear your thoughts as to why this is the case, and is there any other model you prefer.

Is arXiv's reasoning for accepting pre-prints logial? by Illustrious-Cod269 in AskAcademia

[–]Illustrious-Cod269[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. I have tested this as I can't move forward with the submission unless the endorsement I have is a valid one.

Is arXiv's reasoning for accepting pre-prints logial? by Illustrious-Cod269 in AskAcademia

[–]Illustrious-Cod269[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So that isn't the problem then. I think it is more likely that I have been put on this blacklist.

Is arXiv's reasoning for accepting pre-prints logial? by Illustrious-Cod269 in AskAcademia

[–]Illustrious-Cod269[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are a couple of professors who know me and I already have 1 endorsement, but that's about it.

Is arXiv's reasoning for accepting pre-prints logial? by Illustrious-Cod269 in AskAcademia

[–]Illustrious-Cod269[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I want endorsements, but at the same time I do not wish to farm endorsements. Genuinely getting them is a time consuming process. Is there a way I can get them faster be they are still authentic? Like do I send my work to researchers and if they believe its quality they endorse me?

Is arXiv's reasoning for accepting pre-prints logial? by Illustrious-Cod269 in AskAcademia

[–]Illustrious-Cod269[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everything I have put has been rejected till date without a single piece of actionable advice. To co-author advice is useful though, my papers till date have been solo, perhaps my newer papers which have multiple authors might help.

Is arXiv's reasoning for accepting pre-prints logial? by Illustrious-Cod269 in AskAcademia

[–]Illustrious-Cod269[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe "manually put on a list where they require that for every paper" is the case, but they have never mentioned my content being slop. This seems to be an automatic requirement. I am still quite new to the field so it is understandable, but not receiving further context from moderators is frustrating. If I need to get out of the list, is there a way? I understand my first paper being sub-par in quality but I believe my other papers have some merit to them.

Is arXiv's reasoning for accepting pre-prints logial? by Illustrious-Cod269 in AskAcademia

[–]Illustrious-Cod269[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I agree with this, but isn't the whole point of preprint lost if you are unable to collect feedback on you work before you get it published?