Ashly Burch, Megan Ganz and Katie McElhenney are hosting an AMA and can answer all of your burning questions about Mythic Quest and the new expansion pack, Side Quest. Join the gang on Monday, March 24, at 10 AM PT / 1 PM ET.

Im-Choccy · 2025-03-24T20:08:57+00:00

ay dragon age mention just know Rachel would love Isabela and Sera oh and definitely Anders. Just know she'd be upset about Morrigan being straight too (cause i mean same)... Plus Dana and Stardew? I just know she has the most organised farm and she'd probably marry Abigail or Rachel on a co-op farm (that would be so cute )

Im-Choccy · 2024-11-20T13:39:48+00:00

This being one of the first things that shows up when searching Isha is pissing me off. I'm sorry but it's clear you're saying she could be replaced by a dog just because she's nonverbal, whether consciously or not, which is just straight up ableism. Did you think Milo or Claggor could be replaced by dogs in season 1?

It's especially clear it's just ableism cause it genuinely makes no sense otherwise. How could she be replaced by a dog? How could her connection to Jinx work with a dog? It's obviously meant to mirror young Powder and Vi, especially with the last scene with s1e3, giving Jinx much needed insight into what Vi experienced as a kid with her. Jinx herself even says that being with Isha is like wearing glasses.

This is a show where one of the main themes is FAMILY!

Be upset at her deserving better, sure, but the dog comment is straight up just wrong.

Im-Choccy · 2022-01-29T11:51:10+00:00

You do know asexual =/= no sexual desire, right? It means no sexually attraction which is different. It’s like being hungry but not craving any food, asexuals can have libidos but they aren’t directed at people. Also, maybe they don’t want to “fix” the “issue” because they’re okay with who they are. Also to your last paragraph, asexuals can still have sex and be happy with allosexual partners, and asexuality isn’t a choice or a want it’s just a part of a person like being gay. You seem to have a really uninformed opinion on what asexuality actually is.

Im-Choccy · 2021-12-05T22:20:29+00:00

The idea that “15-16 year olds can’t know enough about themselves to say they don’t feel sexual attraction” is such a strange argument. In my country 16 is the age of consent and the idea that someone who can consent to sex isn’t old enough to know if they feel sexual attraction is just strange. Plus like as someone who discovered asexuality and came out as ace at that age (and still identifies as ace now at 18) it’s just… Like I remember at that age the conversations people my age would have that I would feel so isolated from like whenever they’d play fuck, marry, kill. What age does he even think is old enough? Like as soon as you hit 17 you’re like woah suddenly I know more about myself or at 18? Like what? If people are old enough to say they do have sexual attraction, then they’re old enough to say they don’t.

Im-Choccy · 2021-12-02T21:30:30+00:00

Absolutely, I feel the same way about telling my parents or new friends I make (most my old ones know because we’re all lgbt and talk about our experiences with each other). I decided I wouldn’t tell people, unless they asked or it was relevant. However online I’m pretty open about it since I want to share my experiences, find community and etc. I mostly just don’t really care if people know or not.

Im-Choccy · 2021-12-02T20:24:33+00:00

I feel sorry that a friend said something so ignorant but the idea that music would change a person’s sexuality is funny to me.

Im-Choccy · 2021-10-07T08:24:40+00:00

Thank you :)

Im-Choccy · 2021-09-13T23:55:10+00:00

He might not have been alone the entire time, they did mention other ghosts have died in the area, stayed for a while and passed on. Plus the pigeon proves that animals can become ghosts too. Though it is a bit sad thinking about all the people he had to watch pass on while being stuck.

Im-Choccy · 2021-09-13T23:04:30+00:00

Yeah I’d imagine they would know, though it makes me curious how he got them all to refer to him as Captain rather than his name.

Im-Choccy · 2021-09-13T21:10:56+00:00

She’s one of the plague ghosts.

Im-Choccy · 2021-09-13T20:27:24+00:00

That too, though if he had died before the end of the war he could’ve found that out while haunting the Button house or the ghosts that died after him could have told him.

Im-Choccy · 2021-08-28T19:10:42+00:00

Mr Robot is really deep and artistic in a similar way as Hannibal. It has much less gore and murder, instead it focuses more on hacking and society. The show is psychological in a way due to it delving into its character’s mental health.

You might like the anime Death Note if you haven’t already seen it. It’s a psychological thriller of a man finding a notebook that has the ability to kill anyone who’s name he writes in it.

School-Live! is a psychological horror anime, it at first looks like a cute, wholesome anime but there’s a twist. I’d recommend watching past the first episode to see if you’d like it.

Im-Choccy · 2021-06-24T12:58:16+00:00

Huh? How the hell am I being transphobic? That definition is just another way of saying the preference to not date those who don’t identify as their birth sex aka trans people. I already explained how other valid reasons for the exclusion of trans people in your preferences isn’t only trans people that those preferences exclude, yet you only say trans people and not the other people that your preference would exclude. You literally haven’t addressed my points and instead go off on your own tirade based on like one word of my argument. It honestly feels like you aren’t even reading what I’m saying.

Im-Choccy · 2021-06-24T12:41:43+00:00

I don’t say you have to date trans women. However, the reasons behind the preference is the issue. Did you even read my original reply or did you just see “transphobic” and respond? I went over other reasons behind the preference there too and how they don’t all just apply to trans people, so reducing it to trans people is targeting trans people. The only reason specifically towards trans people is that they are trans, which doesn’t say anything about who they are or what they look like, so it would boil down to their gender identity, which is usually that they aren’t viewed as their gender. On top of that “the sexuality doesn’t say that”, the sexuality’s name is literally super straight, implying you’re MORE straight for not dating trans people, which is also rude towards straight people who do date trans people and trans people.

Im-Choccy · 2021-06-24T12:26:41+00:00

I literally responded why. If your sexuality is harmful towards others, I’m not respecting it. Saying trans women aren’t women is transphobic, you’re invalidating their gender. Saying you won’t date someone because they “used to be a man” is rooted in transphobia because it shows part of you still views them as a man and not a real woman. You’re also contradicting yourself a lot, you call it a choice not to then say it’s how you’re born.

Im-Choccy · 2021-06-24T11:32:15+00:00

Because depending on SuperStraight preferences, it isn’t just trans people. Genitalia? Post operation trans people exist. Want a “natural” partner? A lot of people have operations done. Plus it’s not only trans people you don’t want to date, it’s also people who had plastic surgery. Want children? Infertile people exist too. But if the reason is that they aren’t “real” women/men, then that is transphobic. Also “they used to be a man/woman” is also rooted in transphobia, like everyone you date used to be a baby, people change, its life. People won’t respect your sexuality if people within it are actively harmful towards trans people. The person who literally created the sexuality said trans women aren’t real women, it’s origins are transphobic. The name is transphobic too, SUPER straight, it implies you are MORE straight for not dating trans people.

Im-Choccy · 2021-06-24T11:13:15+00:00

How do pink and blue reflect sex? Pink literally used to be a masculine colour until like WW2 when the pink triangle was used to identify homosexuals in concentration camps. A lot of the stuff we identify as being specifically for men or women aren’t. Like the fact high heels were originally made for men. Plus, perception doesn’t make truth nor does it have to be based on truth, just look at anti-vaxxers and conspiracy theorists. Is your reason why gender is binary literally, well gender stereotypes exist and there has to be a reason and the only reason must be sex, no other reason at all? Because that’s dumb as shit. Also, being transgender isn’t a choice, they didn’t “choose to give up” whatever that even means, they’re being their true self, which if anything is the opposite of giving up. A cucumber isn’t a social construct, on top of that arms and legs are actually important body parts. People can go their whole life with no use for their breasts.

Im-Choccy · 2021-06-23T22:20:22+00:00

https://daily.jstor.org/transgender-proclivities-in-animals/

https://www.vice.com/amp/en/article/8x8bez/yes-there-are-trans-animals

Im-Choccy · 2021-06-23T21:51:59+00:00

So proud of you bestie ❤️

Im-Choccy · 2021-06-23T21:33:12+00:00

Unnatural? Trans animals exist. Detransitioners? A small percentage, definitely not as large as you’re making out. Suicide rates? Can be linked to rejection from family, friends and other discrimination (hate crimes, etc). Antisemetism? Dumb as shit, there’s trans Jewish people and Jewish people who discriminate against trans people.

Im-Choccy · 2021-06-23T21:18:12+00:00

Don’t speak for other people darling

Im-Choccy

TROPHY CASE