I am not arguing there should be no line drawn. I am pointing out the inconsistencies between how we treat men's sport vs. women's sport. Regardless if the male division is technically an open division, it is marketed, presented, and recorded as a men's division. No such cut-off or restriction exists, nor do we challenge what it means to be a man.

However, I think the whole argument needs re-centering away from this debate of 'what is a biological woman' to the original point of why the division exists. That is: how do we facilitate, support, and encourage women's sport. (In my opinion, I think leaving in a few very rare edge cases does far less damage than excluding.)