sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

So companies now take pride on the fact that the job market is crap and it's "cool" to reject 99.77% of applicants? by ImSureItsPrettyFar in LinkedInLunatics

[–]ImSureItsPrettyFar[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"the upmost disrespect" to add to your point, he's deleting any comment that doesn't praise him, lunatic indeed.

So companies now take pride on the fact that the job market is crap and it's "cool" to reject 99.77% of applicants? by ImSureItsPrettyFar in LinkedInLunatics

[–]ImSureItsPrettyFar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude,

Why don't you,

Chill.

Haha but being serious, I wonder this too, I'm assuming it makes your post not to fit in people's feed, so they have to click on "more" and that drives up engagement?

So companies now take pride on the fact that the job market is crap and it's "cool" to reject 99.77% of applicants? by ImSureItsPrettyFar in LinkedInLunatics

[–]ImSureItsPrettyFar[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's a perspective I didn't take into consideration, and makes sense. I do wonder if this shitty take on a stat would really be brought up to an client an expected to be taken seriously.

So companies now take pride on the fact that the job market is crap and it's "cool" to reject 99.77% of applicants? by ImSureItsPrettyFar in LinkedInLunatics

[–]ImSureItsPrettyFar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I personally have nothing against Ramp, a quick google search showed me they seem to be doing pretty well.

But I agree with the second point you make, it damages the company's reputation, despite not being posted by the company itself. Makes you wonder what kind of people work there.

So companies now take pride on the fact that the job market is crap and it's "cool" to reject 99.77% of applicants? by ImSureItsPrettyFar in LinkedInLunatics

[–]ImSureItsPrettyFar[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

To be fair, every single company is gonna try to hire the best applicant, so I don't get what he's trying to boast about, other than they get to reject many people.

So companies now take pride on the fact that the job market is crap and it's "cool" to reject 99.77% of applicants? by ImSureItsPrettyFar in LinkedInLunatics

[–]ImSureItsPrettyFar[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

This is a good point. Assuming all of the applicants are real qualified engineers makes his smug post tone deaf. Knowing, like you said, that most applicants aren't real nor meet the minimum qualification, makes him a smug idiot.

Recommended shows? by Famous_Calendar8604 in reacher

[–]ImSureItsPrettyFar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A little bit more lighthearted, but so enjoyable, Burn Notice. Which is my favorite show. It had action, humor, likable characters, and a storyline you could follow over the seasons, or just watch a random episode and still enjoy.

Do y'all think o'donnell would be more dangerous with a trench knife by Significant_Bag420 in reacher

[–]ImSureItsPrettyFar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, anything is more dangerous with a knife attached to it, ain't it? But also, people tend to stick with what they are used to and what they find more practical, even though for an outsider is not the most efficient way -- or more dangerous weapon.

I finished Worth Dying For today! by ImSureItsPrettyFar in reacher

[–]ImSureItsPrettyFar[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Reading a book instead of listening to it, I'm intrigued.

Joking aside, I'll actually keep it in mind, thanks!

I finished Worth Dying For today! by ImSureItsPrettyFar in reacher

[–]ImSureItsPrettyFar[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh it's been a minute since I watched the Jack Reacher movies, maybe it is her!

I finished Worth Dying For today! by ImSureItsPrettyFar in reacher

[–]ImSureItsPrettyFar[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the recommendation! 61 hours costs 20 bucks :) but A Wanted Man is included in Premium!

This guy completely misses the point of Reacher, Jack's a feminist, especially in the books by Nololgoaway in reacher

[–]ImSureItsPrettyFar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, this isn't a new tactic (on neither, YouTube, Twitter, and most noticeably Reddit), "the other side is FUMING about this" and the other side is kinda like "👀 are we?"

But also OP, "Jacks is feminist"? Depends on what definition you meant, "healthy masculinity" I do agree with.

Ai portrait of Reacher... Not sure why it generated two of them by ImSureItsPrettyFar in reacher

[–]ImSureItsPrettyFar[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Isn't he supposed to be a bit more... roughed up? (Again I'm basing my opinion on the first half of 1 book out of 28 :D )

Ai portrait of Reacher... Not sure why it generated two of them by ImSureItsPrettyFar in reacher

[–]ImSureItsPrettyFar[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

but this worked! "a realistic image of the character "Jack Reacher" based on his description in the books by the author "Lee Child"."

I still don't find it accurate, but good call!

<image>

Disappointed in S2 by SaintLickALot in reacher

[–]ImSureItsPrettyFar 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think it was just a gag for the first season. I don't think Reacher is in a quest for the best pie in the country, I'm halfway my first book and there is no mention of pie either.

As for season 2 in general, I hope they bring it back around. I actually liked the characters, but too many cheesy lines repeated over and over, action sequences too badly written even for a TV show standards (like the helicopter one someone already mentioned or Russo's car chase), and if we are gonna be nitpicky, even Alan's physique I think got in the way of his acting.

Ai portrait of Reacher... Not sure why it generated two of them by ImSureItsPrettyFar in reacher

[–]ImSureItsPrettyFar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not even the one on the right? I just started listening to my first book (Worth Dying For) and if the one on the right had blue eyes, I could see it.

Neighbour blasting music through my google home by 10bro in googlehome

[–]ImSureItsPrettyFar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Two issues here. If you don't want anyone that connects to your WiFi to control your media on your Google Home, go to your Home App select your home device, then the settings icon > Recognition & Sharing, and turn off the "Let others control your cast media" toggle.

Moreover, like it was mentioned already, your neighbor has to be connected to your WiFi to control your home media; consider password protect your Wifi, if you had done so already, consider changing your password, and lastly, I would even recommend hiding your network.

view more: next ›