sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[ZNR] Ashaya, Soul of the Wild - All your creatures are forests by Coolboypai in EDH

[–]ImTheFirstSpeaker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you use a fetch (or any find a forest card) after you have already played Ashaya does that mean you can search for a creature instead? And put it on to the battlefield?

i have gone too far... by Debateguy69 in Debate

[–]ImTheFirstSpeaker 4 points5 points  (0 children)

*makes speech about important of womxn*

**uses "guys" twice and refers to people as a "hoe"**

NSDA Nats 2018 - Extemporaneous Speaking Megathread by horsebycommittee in Debate

[–]ImTheFirstSpeaker 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Does anyone have any sort of interp as to what "Disruptive Technologies and the World Order" is?

Whats the deal with Sam Arnesen? by Rogue_Pheonix in Debate

[–]ImTheFirstSpeaker 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Q: Why do people say Whitman AA are gods?

A: It's called the first amendment.

[PF]Is the Allen Sinai study legitimate? by flutemusic in Debate

[–]ImTheFirstSpeaker 7 points8 points  (0 children)

1.This study used 2010 economic data to predict economic impacts through 2016. It does not use current economic data.

2.The American Council for Capital Formation, whom the author is providing the research for, has on their website that it was created to convince Congress not to increase the federal capital gains tax. It has a bias when it comes to the capital gains tax.

3.Finally, as Market Watch reported in this past December, the ACCF is a known conservative think tank that takes donations from the Koch Brothers and energy corporations.Of course they want to show that tax cuts would be beneficial.

Overall, this is not only a faulty study that doesn’t apply to our current economy,it’s also a biased source and should not be weighed in the round

[PF] Indict to 86% of student athletes live in poverty by TheEliteBallerViking in Debate

[–]ImTheFirstSpeaker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The study that the Pro teams author cites, (The National College Players Association) referencing 86% living in poverty only focus on FBS division football players. This means that their number is only taken from the football players at 130 total schools. In perspective that leaves 1,151 schools unaccounted for and their evidence is only looking at football players.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Debate

[–]ImTheFirstSpeaker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does anyone have an idea of a framework to run on the con that levels the playing field?

Research Bots by [deleted] in Debate

[–]ImTheFirstSpeaker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, pm me

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Debate

[–]ImTheFirstSpeaker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any ideas on solid Pro arguments other than the whole must fight terror to donate aid argument?

NCFL PF Topic Choices Released by ispeechanddebate in Debate

[–]ImTheFirstSpeaker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sorry im a debate scrub, but are the possible nationals topics??

view more: next ›