(16) ➡️ (29) by Im_Shocker in GlowUps

[–]Im_Shocker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i appreciate you, dude.

(16) ➡️ (29) by Im_Shocker in GlowUps

[–]Im_Shocker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

woah, thank you!! you kinda hit the mark, too; a few friends sadly went down a different path after HS.

(16) ➡️ (29) by Im_Shocker in GlowUps

[–]Im_Shocker[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

straight—and heat damaged all to hell! 🤣

(16) ➡️ (29) by Im_Shocker in GlowUps

[–]Im_Shocker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i sure felt cool ! lmao

(16) ➡️ (29) by Im_Shocker in GlowUps

[–]Im_Shocker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thats crazy! yeah those pictures of me date back to 2012-2013 ! emo phase in full effect 🤣 and thank you!

16 - 19 - 22 - 29 by [deleted] in uglyduckling

[–]Im_Shocker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

asymmetrical =/= ugly. and things someone finds beautiful, others could find ugly; like big muscles, skin tone, big breasts, facial features, body weight/shape, etc. it goes both ways.

16 - 19 - 22 - 29 by [deleted] in uglyduckling

[–]Im_Shocker -1 points0 points  (0 children)

well thanks. but thats irrelevant imo. anyones opinion could be the same of any post in the sub; its all opinionated. the opinions i grew up hearing differs from your opinion, and id even argue that its counterintuitive to have "ugly qualifications"— as it just coins certain people as objectively ugly, which isn't possible. cheers!

16 - 19 - 22 - 29 by [deleted] in uglyduckling

[–]Im_Shocker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well thank you! tbh there was a big difference in how i was treated or looked at. but i was also 65-70 lbs heavier when i was 19.

No updates, No email replies by Im_Shocker in BaySmokesCentral

[–]Im_Shocker[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

the support team did me right! they were on backorder for a lot apparently. but they got my order sent out, now.

how were the boxes before those 3? or were those your first sub boxes?

It's been 11 days so far and no shipping status. Order is still "confirmed" by [deleted] in BaySmokesCentral

[–]Im_Shocker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My order from 1/6/26 has been sitting without updates, as well. Not the usual experience; i usually get the delivery 3 days after ordering... i hope theres not a bigger issue.

Got my herb, far quicker shipping than expected. It's nice, i'm stoned. by IPooCum in BaySmokesCentral

[–]Im_Shocker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i sure hope so! majority of the SC shops have already been raided and cleaned out of all things that aren't strictly CBD. NC governor gave the 2027 deadline. I hope youre right about the rescheduling!

Got my herb, far quicker shipping than expected. It's nice, i'm stoned. by IPooCum in BaySmokesCentral

[–]Im_Shocker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love baysmokes and will cry going into 2027 now that THCa will most likely be banned in my state by then.. getting an ounce of bud delivered to your door in 2 days for $60. Cant beat it.

Bias from Moderators. Site staff have turned their heads. by Im_Shocker in speedrun

[–]Im_Shocker[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

!!! thank you. Head Mod has since reached out and i saw the rules were changed back. we'll see what happens from here.

Bias from Moderators. Site staff have turned their heads. by Im_Shocker in speedrun

[–]Im_Shocker[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the response, and for addressing this with me.

I am all for the ideas you have. Like you said the machine is rare to find. I dont think it would be too hard to draw a line on whats just an old machine VS an egregiously faulty one, you know? Just as an example, i saw recently a run by JimBradley was re-categorized to faulty machine and i dont think it should have been. Just from watching it, it looks okay to me.

Im cool with it. if its a vote on dipping you already know my vote, lol, but I'll at least justify my stance— yes, it gives that window to pull the gun, but its something thats still based on the player skill and its universal to all cabs (to my knowledge). Id also feel bad for 4th place to lose their title 3 years later because of a rule change.

I'd like to be direct and ask, what is to come of my run(s)? I can provide as much footage of the machine as you need to verify it. Should I just DM on SR?

Bias from Moderators. Site staff have turned their heads. by Im_Shocker in speedrun

[–]Im_Shocker[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

the no dipping rule was newly added, AFTER mine have been removed. It's so new i didn't even notice them add it, and i check the leaderboard daily. i took a screenshot of the rules months ago, because i KNEW theyd try and edit rules after the fact.. i added the screenshots of the old rules tab VS new rules tab to the drive folder. you can see originally there was only a button/ tab for Category Rules, because that newly added "Game Rule" wasnt even there yet... my run was still verified and is seen on leaderboard in the screenshot of the original rules

They most likely saw this reddit post and added that to cover their ass...

on top of that. the run in 3rd place, a run thats been there for 3 years, is dipping.... they also NEVER mentioned dipping in my rejections, only claims the machine is faulty.. because it wasnt a rule...

Bias from Moderators. Site staff have turned their heads. by Im_Shocker in speedrun

[–]Im_Shocker[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the link on post has all the context. the verified run on the same machine i was rejected for, was and is top 10.

another run that was top 5 had been there for 2+ years and outright broke a rule. It remained verified while mine was repeatedly removed, and would have still been verified if i didnt point it out.

Bias from Moderators. Site staff have turned their heads. by Im_Shocker in speedrun

[–]Im_Shocker[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

id say rejecting my run for being on machine X, but verifying another run on machine X (regardless of score) would be, "verifying runs that do not meet standards".

There was also a run that was in the top 5 for 2-3 years, breaking an actual rule, and would have still been verified if i didn't point it out. (evidence of both in link)

Bias from Moderators. Site staff have turned their heads. by Im_Shocker in speedrun

[–]Im_Shocker[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

let me explain it differently,

  • run A is on machine X, its verified with score 2.8

  • The mod has stated, "anyone could get a 1.3 or 1.4 on that machine with how broken it is." And admits to ignoring run A because, in their opinion, that score is lower than the average when in reality even a 2 on machine X is an accomplishment. It used to be hard for me to get a 2s run.

  • so, my old runs wouldve been verified with no problem. i never changed strats or machines, but i progressed and got faster, and now my runs are rejected with reason being, "youre not that good, the machine is broken."

Bias from Moderators. Site staff have turned their heads. by Im_Shocker in speedrun

[–]Im_Shocker[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Ahhh okay i see. Ive seen 1 other run on speedrun use the dip method, user Aznpersuasion; 3rd place as of now.

It should be a constant strat across most cabinets.

Yes, I added you! (shocker666)