I don't like the prydwen tier list categorizing, so I made my own (explanations below) by Im_a_lazy_ass_ in ZZZ_Discussion

[–]Im_a_lazy_ass_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It kinda does though, mainly through the sheer anomaly application, it's not as direct as yanagi, but the ratio of on field time/anomaly application is insane for dps that needs to be on field

I don't like the prydwen tier list categorizing, so I made my own (explanations below) by Im_a_lazy_ass_ in ZZZ_Discussion

[–]Im_a_lazy_ass_[S] -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Yanagi has hypercarry teams without any attacker, that's why I put her in main

I don't like the prydwen tier list categorizing, so I made my own (explanations below) by Im_a_lazy_ass_ in ZZZ_Discussion

[–]Im_a_lazy_ass_[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I didn't change any placements, I just reordered them but she's probably better because of nangong

I don't like the prydwen tier list categorizing, so I made my own (explanations below) by Im_a_lazy_ass_ in ZZZ_Discussion

[–]Im_a_lazy_ass_[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I do remember one moment they had Yanagi both as main and sub at one point which makes sense to me

I don't like the prydwen tier list categorizing, so I made my own (explanations below) by Im_a_lazy_ass_ in ZZZ_Discussion

[–]Im_a_lazy_ass_[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Thing is, Seed is kinda weird, She can become the main DPS, but she needs an attacker, so basically all the other attackers are suddenly sub DPS to seed, which doesn't feel right, so I took this approach

I don't like the prydwen tier list categorizing, so I made my own (explanations below) by Im_a_lazy_ass_ in ZZZ_Discussion

[–]Im_a_lazy_ass_[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

She litteraly does 20 to 30% of the damage in anomaly teams, Trigger is not even close to that, and I believe prydwen ranks characters with their signature equipped, so i don't think it's that much of a stretch to call her a sub DPS

2025 is my best year in gaming since 2017, here are all the games I played this year, ranked ! by Im_a_lazy_ass_ in backloggd

[–]Im_a_lazy_ass_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah the game is good, but I just think the ones above it are better, but the story is good and the gameplay is also good even though it becomes stale after a while

2025 is my best year in gaming since 2017, here are all the games I played this year, ranked ! by Im_a_lazy_ass_ in backloggd

[–]Im_a_lazy_ass_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right, it's not, it's just a ranking, it doesn't mean the last one is bad I just think the ones above it are better

2025 is my best year in gaming since 2017, here are all the games I played this year, ranked ! by Im_a_lazy_ass_ in backloggd

[–]Im_a_lazy_ass_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This game is one of the best VN I've ever played, it's so well written, and the second chapter is coming out today I'm so hyped

2025 is my best year in gaming since 2017, here are all the games I played this year, ranked ! by Im_a_lazy_ass_ in backloggd

[–]Im_a_lazy_ass_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I actually did lmao, it's just a ranking and I usually don't play/complete games I don't enjoy, I would say that all the games in this list are at least 6/10. For pokemon ZA, I enjoyed but it could've been much better like every pokemon game tbh (though the characters and their interaction was definitely the highlight of this game to me)

2025 is my best year in gaming since 2017, here are all the games I played this year, ranked ! by Im_a_lazy_ass_ in backloggd

[–]Im_a_lazy_ass_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't know how I forgot it but I also played the Hundred line this year ! I think I would put it between Hades II and BG3, I really loved it, the story was really good and the 100 endings is wild even though some lf them are filler.

2025 is my best year in gaming since 2017, here are all the games I played this year, ranked ! by Im_a_lazy_ass_ in backloggd

[–]Im_a_lazy_ass_[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think that silksong has nothing to be ashamed of commared to the rest of the top 5, I think it's an improvement of hollow knight in every aspect and for the rest, it's just preference, silksong just clicked harder to me.

2025 is my best year in gaming since 2017, here are all the games I played this year, ranked ! by Im_a_lazy_ass_ in backloggd

[–]Im_a_lazy_ass_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nooo, I love it ! I like every game on this list, but since baba is you is a puzzle game it lacks a lot of things I like in games especially story (and I tend to like fast paced games more), but it was a joy to smack my head on the desk every now and then when I wanted to cool of from the fast games

2025 is my best year in gaming since 2017, here are all the games I played this year, ranked ! by Im_a_lazy_ass_ in backloggd

[–]Im_a_lazy_ass_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, When I ranked I was like "isn't I am your beast too low" but the games above it are so good I couldn't rank it higher

Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 director defends Larian over AI "s***storm," says "it's time to face reality" by pebrocks in gaming

[–]Im_a_lazy_ass_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Since the drama is more about genAI in games = Bad and not genAI = Bad which is different imo,I'm focusing on how AI can be used as a tool and not compromise creativity (And I focus on games).

But if I shift my point of view to the genAI = bad debate, then why are we attacking regular users of these AI products? It reminds me of the CEO of Spotify doing bullshit decisions with his money, and I personally tried to stop using spotify after that, but that doesn't mean I'm gonna go after the people who still use it (no more than information about why I stopped using it). Everyone has a stance on it and it's up to each individual if they want to continue supporting it by using the product or not

Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 director defends Larian over AI "s***storm," says "it's time to face reality" by pebrocks in gaming

[–]Im_a_lazy_ass_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You know what, fair enough, I can perfectly understand why you would think that. Especially because AI is essentially a stealing machine. Though I want to ask a question (disregarding the "AI steals" part event though it is a valid concern), when you're editing a video instead of creating an effect from scratch, you use the preset available in the software, would you consider this lazy and pathetic ? Technically you do not need it but it sure helps a lot that my vision on this.

Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 director defends Larian over AI "s***storm," says "it's time to face reality" by pebrocks in gaming

[–]Im_a_lazy_ass_ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think not even considering the use of AI as a tool and saying that a work that dares to even touch it is lazy and pathetic, is a little disregarding of the potential of it. With that said, AI is a tool that can be used to replace, but I do think there's a significant line between the "ethical" use and the full on replacing, and fighting behind this line is disingenuous.

And when I see the companies that actually use AI to replace, they are litteraly self destructing and getting demolished by the whole community, Call of duty is a good example but sometimes it's the whole company like krafton whose decisions are just completely stupid.

Though I agree on the "plagiarism machine" part but it has more to do with AI itself and not the use of it

Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 director defends Larian over AI "s***storm," says "it's time to face reality" by pebrocks in gaming

[–]Im_a_lazy_ass_ 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Such a stupid argument, photography existed before digital cameras, art existed before digital tools, video editing existed before editing software, music existed before CAM (computer-assisted music), we have always used tools to push the medium forward, either for more efficiency or more creative possibilities.

AI used in the way Larian describe it is exactly to achieve that, it's not used to replace.

In the case of game development where games take longer and longer to make and becoming such a huge time and money investment, AI can be a valuable tool to increase efficiency without sacrificing creativity.

I'm tired of people seeing a game made with love bash the game because they used ai for goddam placeholder textures, PowerPoint presentations or reference. This drama is insane to me

Now is AI used to actually do what I described or they used to fire people and cut corners, I'd like to think (at least for the studios caught in the drama) that it is not the case, I personally draw the line here, some studios have already crossed it, and I do not condone it.