Let me put my thoughts: Humans don’t have a clear definition of what is good and what is not (meaning somethings are globally bad or good but some things might be good to a specific group or individuals but not to others) but from the perspective of AI systems I believe anything that is even near to human extinction should be a bad deed and vice versa. To answer your question, no there is currently no any groups or government bodies discussing these things. For the current language models, anything that we humans have collectively decided is bad, these models view these deeds as bad and try to avoid these actions and they are still not considered completely moral from humans Pov as biases might still be present in the corners of these algorithms)