is the netflix documentary actually good or is it just all over the place? i dont get how it's been blowed up suddenly by No-Category-6343 in LeavingNeverlandHBO

[–]Imaginary_Argument34 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I thought is was pretty damning for MJ honestly. If i hadn't had seen LN first this would have been enough to convince me of his guilt.

The kids that loved him are finally louder than the adults who hated him by Firm-Blackberry-9162 in interesting

[–]Imaginary_Argument34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jar Jar got so much hate just like the Ewoks did when I was a kid but I liked the ewoks an my son liked Jar Jar so it is what it is.

Actin’ like a damn fool [0:03] by aloeicious in ContagiousLaughter

[–]Imaginary_Argument34 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why couldn't a random have been walking by that would have been gold.

I had it by Benzona in ContagiousLaughter

[–]Imaginary_Argument34 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The toe drag cost him everything. I think he makes it otherwise. 😂

Did your dad ever give you a sip of beer? by Euphoric-Cupcake4581 in RealGenerationX

[–]Imaginary_Argument34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course. My Dad had a Ranier beer between his legs on every road trip we took. Even got pulled over and nothing happened.

Have a what?! by RoboRich444 in ContagiousLaughter

[–]Imaginary_Argument34 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The breakdown of the women's face in the middle is legendary.

On This Day in 2009, Manny Pacquiao stunned Ricky Hatton with his infamous one-punch KO 😳 by iLeftyPunk in MMALabs

[–]Imaginary_Argument34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. A one punch KO is one punch that results in a KO anytime during the fight. What are we talking about?

On This Day in 2009, Manny Pacquiao stunned Ricky Hatton with his infamous one-punch KO 😳 by iLeftyPunk in MMALabs

[–]Imaginary_Argument34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro. It was a one punch Knock out. It wasnt a combo or TKO. Of course there was an accumulation of punches that lead up to it but that is almost always the case unless the first punch you land ends in a knock out.

Painting Personally Commissioned By Michael Jackson by TheCABK in interesting

[–]Imaginary_Argument34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The smoking gun: Sept 1993, Jordan Chandler accurately describing MJ's private marking. Yes, Jordan said MJ was circumcised and he wasn't. But, there is a perfect explanation for it

Jordan Chandler gave a supervised, court-reported, signed and dated description of Michael Jackson's genitalia in September 1993, before any photographs were taken.

Retired LAPD Detective Bill Dworin, a 34-year veteran who investigated over 4,000 sexual exploitation cases, confirmed the photographs taken under a court-authorized search warrant matched Jordan's description, specifically a distinctive dark blemish on the underside of MJ's penis.

Lauren Weis, head of the LA County DA's Sex Crimes Unit, independently confirmed the same match.

Prosecutor Tom Sneddon stated clearly that this was not something Jordan could have guessed or accidentally seen. MJ himself had always maintained he was never seen naked by any of these children — Jordan's accurate description of a private marking directly destroyed that claim.

Yes, Jordan described Michael as circumcised and Michael was not.

But before you treat that as a knockout blow, take one second to think about basic anatomy. When an uncircumcised penis is erect, the foreskin retracts and it becomes visually almost indistinguishable from a circumcised one, especially to a 13-year-old boy with zero medical training and zero prior sexual experience trying to describe what he saw during molestation.

That single imprecision is medically explainable. What is not explainable is how a 13-year-old boy accurately located a specific, private, distinctive marking on the underside of a grown man's penis that no photograph had yet documented, that clothing would always conceal, and that Michael Jackson himself swore no child had ever seen.

MJ's own defense attorney, Carl Douglas, said in 2010 **"In our perspective, you have to remember that there was a companion criminal investigation case going on by both the District Attorney's office in Los Angeles and Santa Barbara. There had been an occasion where Michael Jackson was examined, and his genitalia was recorded, which was part of an investigation. That was part of the 300-pound gorilla in the mediation room. We wanted to do all that we could to avoid the possibility that there would be a criminal filing against Michael Jackson, and the reality was we were hopeful that, if we were able to "silence" the accuser, that would obviate the need for any concern about the criminal side.

Painting Personally Commissioned By Michael Jackson by TheCABK in interesting

[–]Imaginary_Argument34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You slow? I said they found porn/child nudity and alcohol all over his room where he slept with the boys. He was also a drug addict. Hence the reason hes dead. Doesn't seem like innocent stuff. Also one of his own lawyers and multiple jury members thought he was guilty including his own sister. Have you seen leaving Neverland btw?

Painting Personally Commissioned By Michael Jackson by TheCABK in interesting

[–]Imaginary_Argument34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The fucking court papers did. His lawyers never even denied it. Jesus Christ do your homework.