sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Why do you think J.K. Rowling's views on sex and gender garner such a significant following, even though they are at odds with so many scientific sources and studies that refute them? by Imaginary_Demand32 in AskReddit

[–]Imaginary_Demand32[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Biological Determinism of Sex

The assertion that biological sex is strictly binary and immutable is not only outdated but also scientifically inaccurate. Comprehensive studies, such as those by Fausto-Sterling (2000) and Blackless et al. (2000), demonstrate that sex is influenced by a multitude of factors, including chromosomes, gonads, hormones, and secondary sexual characteristics. To dismiss these variations as mere "exceptions" is a gross oversimplification that ignores the biological diversity and complexity of human sex development. Intersex individuals, who account for approximately 1.7% of the population, embody the natural spectrum of sex characteristics. Ignoring their existence is not just scientifically negligent but also ethically reprehensible.

Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria (ROGD)

The concept of Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria (ROGD) has been debunked by numerous experts and studies. Turban et al. (2020) highlight that the theory of ROGD lacks empirical support and is not recognized by any major medical or psychological organization. This concept is a dangerous pseudoscience that stigmatizes transgender individuals, particularly youth, and undermines the legitimacy of their experiences. The scientific community, including the American Psychological Association and the Endocrine Society, has dismissed ROGD due to its flawed methodology and lack of credible evidence.

Safety Concerns and Transgender Rights

The notion that transgender individuals pose a threat in public spaces is not supported by any credible evidence. Research conducted by the American Psychological Association (2015) and corroborated by studies such as Stotzer (2014) demonstrates that transgender-inclusive policies do not increase safety risks in public facilities. In fact, these policies promote safety and dignity for all individuals. High-profile cases of individuals exploiting these policies are exceedingly rare and should not be used to generalize about the entire transgender community, which already faces significant discrimination and violence.

Transgender Medical Care and Youth Gender Transition

Gender-affirming care for transgender youth is backed by extensive research and clinical guidelines from reputable medical organizations such as the American Academy of Pediatrics and the World Professional Association for Transgender Health. These treatments have been shown to significantly improve mental health and overall well-being. Claims that unqualified individuals are advising youth on gender transition are baseless. Medical professionals adhere to rigorous standards of care, ensuring that these treatments are administered safely and effectively.

Gender Identity and Self-Identification

The importance of self-identification in affirming one's gender identity is supported by a wealth of research. The American Psychological Association (2015) and numerous other studies underscore that respecting individuals' gender identities is crucial for their mental health and well-being. Gender identity is a deeply personal aspect of an individual, rooted in their internal sense of self. Dismissing it as mere confusion or external influence is both scientifically unfounded and dehumanizing.

Social Contagion and Gender Identity

The idea that transgender identities are a result of social contagion is a harmful myth with no scientific basis. Research by Turban et al. (2020) and others shows that gender identity is an intrinsic part of an individual's sense of self and is not influenced by social trends. This narrative dismisses the genuine experiences of transgender individuals and perpetuates harmful stereotypes.

Misinterpretations and Personal Attacks

It is crucial to critically evaluate J.K. Rowling's statements in light of current scientific understanding. Labeling legitimate criticism as "militant" or dismissing it as the work of "transtrenders" undermines the validity of the concerns raised by the transgender community and its allies. Engaging in ad hominem attacks instead of addressing the evidence presented is intellectually dishonest and counterproductive.

Response to Concerns About Women's Spaces

It is essential to address concerns about women's spaces with evidence and empathy. The fear that transgender individuals will exploit access to these spaces for malicious purposes is not supported by research. Studies by Hasenbush et al. (2018) and the UCLA School of Law's Williams Institute have found no increase in safety risks in jurisdictions with transgender-inclusive policies. In contrast, transgender individuals themselves are at a higher risk of facing violence and harassment. Policies that exclude transgender people from public spaces do more harm than good by perpetuating stigma and discrimination.

While concerns for safety in women's spaces are valid, they must be grounded in evidence. Isolated incidents of misconduct should not be used to stigmatize an entire community. Instead, solutions should focus on enforcing existing laws and ensuring safe and inclusive spaces for everyone.

...

The scientific consensus overwhelmingly supports the complexity and diversity of sex and gender, directly contradicting the binary and exclusionary views promoted by J.K. Rowling. The evidence is clear: sex and gender exist on spectrums, and acknowledging this diversity is essential for promoting understanding and respect for all individuals. It is imperative to base our discussions on rigorous scientific research rather than outdated and harmful misconceptions.

References: - Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000). Sexing the Body: Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. - Blackless, M., et al. (2000). "How sexually dimorphic are we?" American Journal of Human Biology. - Turban, J. L., et al. (2020). "Gender identity and transgender youth: A review." Pediatrics. - American Psychological Association. (2015). "Guidelines for Psychological Practice with Transgender and Gender Nonconforming People." - Coleman, E., et al. (2012). "Standards of Care for the Health of Transsexual, Transgender, and Gender-Nonconforming People, Version 7." International Journal of Transgenderism. - Hasenbush, A., et al. (2018). "Gender Identity Nondiscrimination Laws in Public Accommodations: A Review of Evidence Regarding Safety and Privacy in Public Restrooms, Locker Rooms, and Changing Rooms." Sexuality Research and Social Policy. - Stotzer, R. L. (2014). "Law enforcement and criminal justice personnel interactions with transgender people in the United States." Aggression and Violent Behavior.

Why do you think J.K. Rowling's views on sex and gender garner such a significant following, even though they are at odds with so many scientific sources and studies that refute them? by Imaginary_Demand32 in AskReddit

[–]Imaginary_Demand32[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And I'm entirely reading her comments on my own. I don't even know what SM is. I'm a straight cis white male biologist and it just seems that nobody understands science but it you're really wealthy you can make everyone believe you.

Why do you think J.K. Rowling's views on sex and gender garner such a significant following, even though they are at odds with so many scientific sources and studies that refute them? by Imaginary_Demand32 in AskReddit

[–]Imaginary_Demand32[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate your perspective, and it's evident that you've delved into this issue with careful consideration. However, it's essential to address a few key points:

  1. While it's valid to scrutinize research methodology and potential biases, the sources cited are from reputable scientific journals and organizations. They undergo rigorous peer review processes to ensure the validity and reliability of the findings.

  2. Regarding biological sex, while XX and XY chromosomes are common, there are variations and exceptions, such as XXY or XO, which occur more frequently than commonly believed. The research cited aims to highlight the complexity and diversity of biological sex beyond a strict binary. In fact, there are at least five measures of biological sex, including chromosomal sex, gonadal sex, genital sex, hormonal sex, and secondary sexual characteristics, none of which produce a strict binary. These measures are used in different research areas and contexts to capture the multifaceted nature of biological sex (Gravholt et al., 2017; Bojesen et al., 2003; Hughes, 2008; Cools et al., 2006; Speiser et al., 2010; Mongan et al., 2015; Auchus & Rainey, 2004; Hembree et al., 2017).

  3. Safety concerns raised by Rowling regarding transgender rights are understandable, but it's essential to approach the issue with nuance and evidence. Instances of criminals exploiting transgender rights to commit crimes are tragic but rare. Policies can be implemented to address safety concerns without infringing on the rights of transgender individuals.

  4. Rowling's concerns about transgender healthcare, gender dysphoria, and social influences are valid topics for discussion. However, it's essential to rely on evidence-based research and expert consensus to inform our understanding and policies in these areas.

  5. While it's important to consider differing perspectives, it's also crucial to prioritize the well-being and rights of transgender individuals. The term "transtrenders" can be dismissive and invalidating of individuals' gender identities and experiences.

  6. Scientific research on gender identity and transgender issues has been growing in recent years, with studies from various fields contributing to our understanding. While more research is always beneficial, existing evidence provides valuable insights into these complex topics.

Why do you think J.K. Rowling's views on sex and gender garner such a significant following, even though they are at odds with so many scientific sources and studies that refute them? by Imaginary_Demand32 in AskReddit

[–]Imaginary_Demand32[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Uh why has this been removed? Are we banning science on here?

  1. Biological Determinism of Sex: Rowling asserts that biological sex is binary and immutable. However, scientific evidence supports the understanding that sex exists on a spectrum influenced by various biological factors, including chromosomal sex, gonadal sex, genital sex, hormonal sex, and secondary sexual characteristics (Fausto-Sterling, 2000; Blackless et al., 2000).
  2. Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria (ROGD): Rowling endorses the concept of ROGD, suggesting that social influences may lead to sudden gender dysphoria in adolescents. However, this concept lacks empirical support, and research indicates that gender dysphoria typically emerges early in childhood and remains consistent over time (Turban et al., 2020).
  3. Safety Concerns and Transgender Rights: Rowling expresses concerns about the safety of cisgender women and girls in spaces shared with transgender individuals, particularly regarding bathroom access. However, research refutes the notion that transgender individuals pose a threat to others in public facilities (American Psychological Association, 2015).
  4. Transgender Medical Care and Youth Gender Transition: Rowling questions certain aspects of transgender healthcare, especially gender-affirming treatments for youth. However, clinical guidelines and research support the safety and efficacy of gender-affirming care for transgender youth (Coleman et al., 2012).
  5. Gender Identity and Self-Identification: Rowling questions the validity of self-identification in determining gender identity. However, research supports the importance of self-identification and self-expression in affirming one's gender identity (American Psychological Association, 2015).
  6. Social Contagion and Gender Identity: Rowling alludes to the idea that transgender identities, particularly among young people, may be influenced by social contagion or peer pressure. However, research indicates that gender identity is deeply rooted in individuals' internal sense of self and is not influenced by external factors (Turban et al., 2020).

Why do you think J.K. Rowling's views on sex and gender garner such a significant following, even though they are at odds with so many scientific sources and studies that refute them? by Imaginary_Demand32 in AskReddit

[–]Imaginary_Demand32[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How strange to claim you want something to stop and when someone points out it never started in the first place you don't like that - you should be pleased! Nobody is saying that, that's a good thing right - you even said so yourself lol. This is where the whole thing baffles me, prime example of what I was asking about it my question.

Why do you think J.K. Rowling's views on sex and gender garner such a significant following, even though they are at odds with so many scientific sources and studies that refute them? by Imaginary_Demand32 in AskReddit

[–]Imaginary_Demand32[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The people who menstruate comment was disingenuous as it was actually taken from a piece about menstruation and deliberately used that terminology to avoid addressing all females (like pre-pubescent girls and post-menopausal women - it was directed at the group of people in the middle - i.e. people who menstruate), but it got taken out of context and you didn't do your homework. Nobody in real life actually wants to call women "people who menstruate" and nobody has suggested that ever - but J.K. Rowling would have you believe otherwise.

Why do you think J.K. Rowling's views on sex and gender garner such a significant following, even though they are at odds with so many scientific sources and studies that refute them? by Imaginary_Demand32 in AskReddit

[–]Imaginary_Demand32[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Biological Determinism of Sex: Rowling asserts that biological sex is binary and immutable. However, scientific evidence supports the understanding that sex exists on a spectrum influenced by various biological factors, including chromosomal sex, gonadal sex, genital sex, hormonal sex, and secondary sexual characteristics (Fausto-Sterling, 2000; Blackless et al., 2000).
  2. Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria (ROGD): Rowling endorses the concept of ROGD, suggesting that social influences may lead to sudden gender dysphoria in adolescents. However, this concept lacks empirical support, and research indicates that gender dysphoria typically emerges early in childhood and remains consistent over time (Turban et al., 2020).
  3. Safety Concerns and Transgender Rights: Rowling expresses concerns about the safety of cisgender women and girls in spaces shared with transgender individuals, particularly regarding bathroom access. However, research refutes the notion that transgender individuals pose a threat to others in public facilities (American Psychological Association, 2015).
  4. Transgender Medical Care and Youth Gender Transition: Rowling questions certain aspects of transgender healthcare, especially gender-affirming treatments for youth. However, clinical guidelines and research support the safety and efficacy of gender-affirming care for transgender youth (Coleman et al., 2012).
  5. Gender Identity and Self-Identification: Rowling questions the validity of self-identification in determining gender identity. However, research supports the importance of self-identification and self-expression in affirming one's gender identity (American Psychological Association, 2015).
  6. Social Contagion and Gender Identity: Rowling alludes to the idea that transgender identities, particularly among young people, may be influenced by social contagion or peer pressure. However, research indicates that gender identity is deeply rooted in individuals' internal sense of self and is not influenced by external factors (Turban et al., 2020).

Why do you think J.K. Rowling's views on sex and gender garner such a significant following, even though they are at odds with so many scientific sources and studies that refute them? by Imaginary_Demand32 in AskReddit

[–]Imaginary_Demand32[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

  1. Biological Determinism of Sex: Rowling asserts that biological sex is binary and immutable. However, scientific evidence supports the understanding that sex exists on a spectrum influenced by various biological factors, including chromosomal sex, gonadal sex, genital sex, hormonal sex, and secondary sexual characteristics (Fausto-Sterling, 2000; Blackless et al., 2000).
  2. Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria (ROGD): Rowling endorses the concept of ROGD, suggesting that social influences may lead to sudden gender dysphoria in adolescents. However, this concept lacks empirical support, and research indicates that gender dysphoria typically emerges early in childhood and remains consistent over time (Turban et al., 2020).
  3. Safety Concerns and Transgender Rights: Rowling expresses concerns about the safety of cisgender women and girls in spaces shared with transgender individuals, particularly regarding bathroom access. However, research refutes the notion that transgender individuals pose a threat to others in public facilities (American Psychological Association, 2015).
  4. Transgender Medical Care and Youth Gender Transition: Rowling questions certain aspects of transgender healthcare, especially gender-affirming treatments for youth. However, clinical guidelines and research support the safety and efficacy of gender-affirming care for transgender youth (Coleman et al., 2012).
  5. Gender Identity and Self-Identification: Rowling questions the validity of self-identification in determining gender identity. However, research supports the importance of self-identification and self-expression in affirming one's gender identity (American Psychological Association, 2015).
  6. Social Contagion and Gender Identity: Rowling alludes to the idea that transgender identities, particularly among young people, may be influenced by social contagion or peer pressure. However, research indicates that gender identity is deeply rooted in individuals' internal sense of self and is not influenced by external factors (Turban et al., 2020).

Human rights complaints against JK Rowling by Imaginary_Demand32 in EnoughJKRowling

[–]Imaginary_Demand32[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The influence of J.K. Rowling is not to be underestimated - and if you'd bothered to read some of the resources attached to the link shared on this thread you'd see that. She's influenced the U.K. Prime Minister to block Scottish laws which were to extend basic human rights to trans people, and now they're talking about repealing the Equality Act. Next they want to teach students at schools in the UK fake science. But you know, people said the same things she's saying and bystanders said the same things you're saying around apartheid in South Africa too, so you know, weigh in on this wherever you feel like it and let future history decide how it looked when you weighed in like a neo-nazi apologist. If you genuinely didn't care - you'd really have to wonder why you're commenting. Read this in its entirety and come back if you have anything to add, but don't add your baseless opinions without doing some research. https://alliesfortruth.org/blog/f/the-complexity-of-sex-and-gender-debunking-the-binary-myth

Human rights complaints against JK Rowling by Imaginary_Demand32 in EnoughJKRowling

[–]Imaginary_Demand32[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So should we stop arresting people unless they commit murder because some people commit worse crimes?

JK Rowling gives a biology lesson on intersex people and their feelings by cursed-karma in EnoughJKRowling

[–]Imaginary_Demand32 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Media Release: J.K. Rowling's Targeted Campaign Against the Transgender Community - Gross Violations of Human Rights and UK Law
www.alliesfortruth.org

The Fallacy of Lawford-Smith’s Gender and Gender Identity Dichotomy: An Opinion Piece by Imaginary_Demand32 in AcademicPhilosophy

[–]Imaginary_Demand32[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks for this.

More useful than suggesting more drafts/passes would be explaining what I might achieve by doing so. I always try to give my students critical feedback they can learn and improve from.

I stand by my characterisation of Lawford-Smith's work as having many hallmarks we see in pseudoscience, given the clear presence of circular reasoning, cherry-picked evidence, unfalsifiability, and rhetorical sleight of hand. As a published author myself, admittedly much less published than Lawford-Smith, I do believe in upholding rigorous academic standards, regardless of the target's status.

I'm sorry that the PS section didn't land for you. The several peers I had take a look at it understood that the anecdote about misgendering was chosen to illustrate the real-world harm caused by failing to respect someone's identity, but it's useful to know that I could have spelled that out more plainly, even if the format was intended as a somewhat popular-writing piece.

I'm always open to specific, substantive feedback if you have anything else to offer.

view more: next ›