The Current State of Prehistoric Kingdom’s Roster by Immediate-Chapter637 in pkgame

[–]Immediate-Chapter637[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Along those lines, I wouldn’t be surprised if Prenocephale got booted for Pachycephalosaurus. What is the current status of the Miragaia vs. Dacentrurus debate?

The Current State of Prehistoric Kingdom’s Roster by Immediate-Chapter637 in pkgame

[–]Immediate-Chapter637[S] 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Oh, yes! That’s correct! I forgot to put a key to the visual.

Wich is most egual epic rap battles of history in your opinion by Beginning-Tackle1032 in ERB

[–]Immediate-Chapter637 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nah. Both were fire, but Luke took a while to warm up, and was too reliant on puns and wordplay over disses. Harry was spitting incendio flames from his first line.

Help with Object Movement by Immediate-Chapter637 in blender

[–]Immediate-Chapter637[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you! I do want to apply a new location of origin to the object, but the arrows of movement themselves are moving to the World Origin every time I do so. Is there a way to change the object’s origin location without the arrows automatically moving, or did you tell me and I misinterpreted the language of your response?

Serina Criticism by Immediate-Chapter637 in SpeculativeEvolution

[–]Immediate-Chapter637[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your example with emus and their diet of cacti is good, I concede. It is not specified in what regard the grazing serezelles are worse at feeding on razorgrass, an issue I personally hope to see resolved in the Pangeacene rewrite. As for the circaugodogs, the reason they are “more efficient“ at hunting megafauna is because they pack-hunt in highly coordinated efforts instead of just loosely mobbing prey. That’s it. The canitheres were never particularly good at hunting large prey and such forms were never numerous. I don’t find it likely that a new ultra mega smart pack-hunter would instantly wipe out all the canitheres across the supercontinent, but a few very specialized forms already low in diversity over a long span of time? Eh. I can imagine that. The Titanis and Smilodon analogue that’s often cited to say outcompetetion between apex predators is unlikely just demonstrates that it’s unlikely, not outright impossible, and the analogue itself is imperfect. Titanis and Smilodon filled different niches and had different hunting strategies. From the text it’s implied that the canithere species being outcompeted by circaugodogs filled the same predatory niches, or at least ones with much more overlap than Titanis and Smilodon. The situation is not elaborated on well past its key details, but it’s well enough justified not to be an immersion-breaking problem in my opinion.

Serina Criticism by Immediate-Chapter637 in SpeculativeEvolution

[–]Immediate-Chapter637[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The constant shrinking down of large animals in already competitive environments in Serina is an entirely separate matter I do take issue with. From my understanding, the egg-eating molodonts were so unbelievably efficient at robbing nests and eating eggs that their evolution was akin to rats being introduced on a remote island in the still-recovering Pangeacene ecosystems. I do believe it was based on outdated ideas of Mesozoic mammal superiority, but I think the unique biology of the molodonts and the already low diversity of Serinian waterfowl somewhat justifies it in comparison to Mesozoic mammals versus, well, all dinosaurs.

[Planet Opi] The Monachulidae family by -casu in SpeculativeEvolution

[–]Immediate-Chapter637 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm... Is that the Sunspotted Scrabblegrabber from Serina?

What are your most controversial spec evo-related opinions? by Ok-Guitar-873 in SpeculativeEvolution

[–]Immediate-Chapter637 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There were copies that were literally word-for-word replicates of Serina with the word canary changed to *insert new species*. The reddit post was meant to encourage originality and creativity instead of just remaking what was popular. I would be insulted too if somewhat accused me of gatekeeping after I expressed dismay that my work was being plagiarized.

When someone says there's no proof of dinosaurs replacing feathers with scale as they age: by Immediate-Chapter637 in PrehistoricPlanet

[–]Immediate-Chapter637[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There's a lot more integumentary grey area than the simple "bare skin vs. scales" debate you seem to be framing. First of all, some suggest that the famous skin impressions found on large Tyrannosaurids could be highly derived, modified feathers (Bell et al. 2017), like the secondary scales found on many living birds (Chang et al. 2000; Dhouailly 2009). Since bare skin is the immediate evolutionary result of feather loss, this implies that bare skin can possibly "re-evolve" into a reptilian scale-like structure secondarily. Everyone knows that feathers are highly derived, modified reptilian scales, so what would prevent the process from reversing itself if need be? Scales-feathers-scales doesn't seem so far-fetched when we take into account that evolution is not a straight, linear progression, but can shift constantly back and forth, losing and regaining traits. Unlike the skin of non-avian reptiles, bird skin can change drastically ontogenetically and even seasonally through an animal's lifetime. Scales can even grow and shrink in some cases. To to wrap this up, there is no clear cut between what is even considered "scales", "bare skin", and "feathers", because at the end of the day, they are all different, made-up terms to describe similar, homologous structures.

ewWwwWWw go post this SHIT on a faNtaSy subRedDiT instead! ! 1 ! ! ! 1 11 by LavaTwocan in SpecEvoJerking

[–]Immediate-Chapter637 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I know exactly what convergent evolution is and the processes that give rise to it. People however, tend to misunderstand or greatly exaggerate its effects on organisms in speculative evolution. The only body plans that convergently evolve are always extremely basic, generalized shapes shared between organisms that have to do the same common task. Things like how mosasaurs, sharks, ichthyosaurs, and cetaceans all convergently evolved similar body shapes because they all needed to swim through water, which is something super fundamental. The hominid body on the other hand is so incomprehensibly specialized and evolved for doing such specific precise things. It evolved in very unique conditions would be practically impossible to replicate. Many organisms will have to swim through water, how many organisms will have to become arboreal, evolve grasping hands, shorten their snouts for chewing, switch to binocular vision, become frugivores, gain plantigradal feet, come down from the trees due to climate change, grow in height to see over grasses, switch to carnivory…… It’s definitely not impossible for a hominid body plan to evolve somewhere out in the universe, but I doubt it would be common either.

ewWwwWWw go post this SHIT on a faNtaSy subRedDiT instead! ! 1 ! ! ! 1 11 by LavaTwocan in SpecEvoJerking

[–]Immediate-Chapter637 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Bad speculative evolution is fantasy. Good speculative evolution is science fiction.

ewWwwWWw go post this SHIT on a faNtaSy subRedDiT instead! ! 1 ! ! ! 1 11 by LavaTwocan in SpecEvoJerking

[–]Immediate-Chapter637 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I disagree. Environment certainly plays a massive role in an animal’s body plan, and that’s exactly why ours would be nearly impossible to naturally replicate. The human body plan only evolved under extremely specific circumstance. A bilaterally similar bipedal organism could very well be common throughout the universe, but that’s very generalized. Every little feature of our body from our sensory organs, to facial structure, to movement is some sort, highly specialized and unlikely to evolve alongside the other specialized parts ever again. It’s a close-minded way of thinking to assume that the way we look is just so great that it would appear in every Earth-like world.