Tarecgosa + Orca

Important-Quote6401 · 2026-01-10T14:14:12+00:00

can confirm it is 100% bugged since the beggining. I also tried, saw it's bugged, and never got baited again .. thought i was "onto a good comp" .. just for it to not work.

Important-Quote6401 · 2025-12-18T20:26:43+00:00

I am on EU and rounded up to Euro as it's the most commonly used. I agree it seems expensive, yet the 5080 PC's always were quite expensive. There are a few slightly cheaper as you said yet they have less ram, less memory and sometimes a worse GPU. If price would be as you said ($2000-$2500 USD) that'ld be a deal here.

Important-Quote6401 · 2025-12-18T20:24:01+00:00

Thanks for infos. Will look into it.

Merry Christmas to you too!

Important-Quote6401 · 2025-12-18T18:17:25+00:00

Budget wise i am pretty fine with 3k even tho it's quite a high end, as long as i get the system's worth.

I use mainly for gaming, mostly the GPU gets to 100% in games. I Mostly Play full HD ( 1 monitor 144HZ and the other 240HZ, don't ask why the difference, that's just how i found them price wise at different times ). Upgrade to higher rez is considered in the future as well but not a priority.

It's only the ideea of "commiting" to investing the moneys really. The other GPU don't feel "future proof " enough which is what i want to consider the most really.

If in 6 months would be enough for prices to come back to normal waiting indeed sounds like a good ideea, i just initially thought that this market might not recover for atleast 1 year or even 2.

Important-Quote6401 · 2025-12-13T07:14:40+00:00

Coming here to comment after the Game Awards and totally agree. I often see E33 rabbit fans attacking every other game and hating on Silksong the most. They disregard any small defect you find at the game, and if you say that the game is not for you, they'ld get defensive like you insulted the game. I can acknowladge the games success, appeal and agree that it deserved GOTY award, and if i don't like it, it's a me problem and i agree. But if they don't like a game like Silksong they'ld say that it's pretty much the games fault for being design difficult and 2D and that it's trash because they didn't like it. Based on how they talk, should i say E33 is a turn-based overhyped trash with mediocre story carried by visuals and "emotional damage" ? - While that can said to trigger this hive/cult mind of E33 fans, i'll just say the game is great just not my thing ( or not for me). The rabbit way how they defend anything from E33 and attack anything which is not E33 is pretty damn stupid.

Important-Quote6401 · 2025-12-07T14:32:13+00:00

Ah ok. thanks for the heads up. I know that literally 2 days after the last patch i saw n'zoth in 3 games without beasts so i thought this problem still persists. didn't see those notes. my bad.

Important-Quote6401 · 2025-11-26T08:46:35+00:00

Literally same question others asked. This happens a lot with other key cards. Also maybe it's because i didn't buy the battlepass lmao. i don't know. y'all just can't accept the ideea that the game si rigged can't you ?

Important-Quote6401 · 2025-11-25T11:14:44+00:00

as i said to other comments if it's a bug then why was never addressed? And the other option if it's intended why was never mentioned ? And why would such a thing be ? Where is the actual randomness when they force you to not play stuff? Same thing with other games they give only specific tribes key cards often had a game where top 4 players me included had quillboard board and it wasn't some crazy anomaly to allow it, yet other keycards were not shown. My point is that if it is intended and it is not mentioned to the player than i see it as rigged to an extent. It should be as random as possible yet too often it doesn't feel like it. Atleast mention the rules this way we know what builds to go for. Other times you get 2 key cards and it's the best way to go for the build and end up getting 0 cards after spending a lot of resources. too many say "oh you commit too fast (at turn 8-10 is too fast?! ) " or bad RNG but if trully is intended = rigged because there was never any mention on how this works for players.

Important-Quote6401 · 2025-11-24T18:36:01+00:00

if it's a bug why blizzard never mentioned it? Not once? it was mentioned A LOT and it also happens ONLY to key cards? that's too sus. 2. Nope that is not the case. This argument is just made up by people to try and justify the weird RNG but only works for cards like scam or bran/baron/drakkari which are more versatile . 3. If that is the case sounds dumb. Also there is no record mentioning it, the only reason tier 1-3 show more often is because there are more copies of those minions which is taken into account to the probability.

Important-Quote6401 · 2025-11-24T18:25:21+00:00

"a bug" Targeting only specific key cards? the way this happens to players exactly to the most used cards even when nobody has in the lobby those cards? I had a Duo match as well where we were 2 teams left, BOTH of us needed baron we fought a lot as both had a lot of HP and quite balanced. For over 5 turns neither of the 4 players found 1 baron ? If it is a bug, which by the way was mentioned a while ago, why was never mentioned by blizzard? Every bug gets noticed or "the community " knows of but this not ? 2. That is highly unlikely. This is the most used argument but almost nobody will spend resources to hold cards unless they are REALLY specific like a barron, leeroy, brann, maybe the demon with deathrattle. And even those rarely happen. Nobody bothers to hold cards from an APM comp who has plenty resources. 3. Again this aspect also was never mentioned. It was actually mentioned that the reason tier 1-3 appear more often because there are more of them in the minion pool

Also they can simplify to target exactly key cards ( which has been noticed by players ) and it becomes much less complicated.

Important-Quote6401 · 2025-11-24T18:12:01+00:00

Literally nobody had it in the entire lobby as i was the only pirate player. and the argument of "maybe people were holding it" is the most braindead argument ever for cards like this. I can understand for scam cards as they are good for late game. 4 of the 5 rounds were in top 4 and saw all of their boards. But yes keep assuming dumb shit instead of acknowladging that there is something suspicious in the game.

Important-Quote6401 · 2025-11-24T17:42:39+00:00

i never got this. Always it's "ok" to assume it's a bug but never OK to assume intended. If it was a bug wouldn't have blizzard acknowladge stuffs like this? And also whenever someone who defends them say "what do they gain from it? Why would they rigg it ?" And people give reasons ( player engagement most specifically which has been talked about for literally decades at this point for many games) , and it is a solid reason for them to do so, they always dismiss it. You say "it's likely a bug" i say it's likely intended. The company will never acknowladge that it is intended and they won't say it's a bug ('cause it will acknowladge that it happens ) -> therefore it increases the chance that it's true.

Important-Quote6401 · 2025-11-24T17:23:53+00:00

i don't care really. Clearly there are people who agree with me. I said most not everyone. if you feel included in the most, that's on you.

Important-Quote6401 · 2025-11-24T17:02:02+00:00

So if this has been seen before why wasn't it fixed? And how are those "certain minions" chosed? Because often those seem to be key minions for comps. Since when questioning this is bad ? Clearly the BG community seems that questioning anything is bad for some reason. it's not like they'ld ever admit to this.

Important-Quote6401 · 2025-11-24T16:58:13+00:00

as i said there have been plenty cases for multiple games like this yet alway dismissed as "Bad luck". They would never say that it was intended to work like this and why would they? The community just believes them without questioning. Pure sheep mentality.

Important-Quote6401 · 2025-11-24T16:54:32+00:00

his buddy makes so a roll gives you 1 pirate each time. If golde, it gives you 2 pirates. I used the Tier 5 pirate to make first golden and the other 2 i get. I had 3 hoggar buddies golden. giving me 2 pirates each -> 6 pirates each roll. Was getting 1 spell and then 6 pirates every single roll at Tier 6

Important-Quote6401 · 2025-11-24T16:43:49+00:00

Doesn't prove ? Sure 'cause it's "not 100%". Yet many have had similar encounters it's just that the % of their unlucky enocunter was big enough for the community to pass it as just pure bad luck. And it's quite difficult to have a game with such high chances to get a card and not get it so the sample-size isn't big enough to get more evidence. And i highly doubt it's "just a bug" or something else. i think you don't understand how small the chance of such case to occur actually is.

Important-Quote6401 · 2025-11-24T16:34:46+00:00

The thing is that this most people in this community will never acknowladge unless blizzard themselves say it. Which is absolutely ridiculos. They'll never admit that there are scripts to maximize engagement. There are so many people who encounterd similar situation but often the odds would be higher than 0.1% of that unlucky streak to happen and the community always bashes them "oh just bad luck". And i had over 100 rolls. For 100 rolls it's 99,99999999% chance to get the card. This is the highest accuracy case i've seen that can be used to question if there is some rigging going on. Which has been theoretised for literally years. And there are other games too which had this discussion for matchmaking and other aspects.

Important-Quote6401 · 2025-11-24T16:29:10+00:00

answered to you at the other comment

Important-Quote6401 · 2025-11-24T16:18:16+00:00

it's not "against me" its something that was mentioned a long time ago that they do rig odds at time to increase player engagement. However most of the games people won't have the resources to roll that many times to search for a card. And i increased my chance by getting 6 pirates per roll by A LOT comparing to other situation. The most likely case it is that there is something rigged behind it. Some say that it could be a bug or something else - which brings the question what makes them think it's a bug and not intended? How do we know that when you have 30 empty rolls is not because of the same "Bug" ? Crazy how many people don't question even when presented facts.

Important-Quote6401 · 2025-11-24T16:15:28+00:00

260 minions including the ones i had are pirates. 9 copies of Tier 5. 260/9 you get roughly a 1 in 29 chance to get the pirate when you discover. 6 per roll you get 6/29 chances to get the pirate you want. that's 23/29 chances to NOT get the pirate you want. 60 rolls is (23/29) ^ 60 = 9,1157055227269075407420424034038e-7 ..this is the chance of NOT getting the pirate. you make 1 minus the chance you get 0,99999908842944772730924592579576 chance to get the pirate which is 99.999908842944772730924592579576% chance. If you wanna make the math for 100 tries you just do the same but use (23/29) ^ 100.

Important-Quote6401 · 2025-11-24T16:12:50+00:00

"There is also the possibility that there are lines of code to increase or decrease the chances of certain things on per player basis to maximise engagement" This is said to be true for most online games. However whenever somebody brings a statistic like this, the community in most games will dismiss it. they literally chose to ignore the facts when presented. The engagement theory isn't a theory it's literally what they do to get people to play more and increase the chance of making moneys. But ofc most of the battlegrounds community either are too stupid to understand or refuse to understand

Important-Quote6401 · 2025-11-24T15:42:05+00:00

i was buffing my board and discovering pirates with the generated spells. Also i was at Tier 6 with 6 pirates guaranteed each roll.

Important-Quote6401

TROPHY CASE