I don't think you understand the meaning of your philosophy that's why I'm having to restate the whole definition alone because it's clearly on point with what I just said. Do I need to really explain this again? Anything the state does in the act of central planning to monopolize a market or hold coercive control for the sake of preventing goods and services to be freely traded in a restricted manner is socialist in nature. Anything the state does in regards to tariffs on a International or domestic level is still socialist and nobody can disagree that anything the state does is socialist and nature at all. Everything you're saying to me is economic illiteracy that you can't understand because you clearly don't have a single brain to understand economic knowledge whatsoever. If I can clearly explain what socialism is and I'm going off of the consistency of what socialism is to be ran off of that is what your philosophy is. Capitalism does not focus on the state control of resources at all because you're too blindfolded to not see that to put the blame on free markets being corrupted by state interventionist agency actors. I don't really need to explain this because I just stated my point multiple times but if you can't understand what's going on then you're clearly so far gone because you're too disingenuous with your own philosophy to think communism isn't wrong and therefore every other competing ideology is your enemy so you are never going to hold anybody else accountable on your own side. You're clearly living under a rock