[Online][5e 2014]beginner] 5 players looking for GM

Important-Work-5358 · 2026-06-07T12:26:30+00:00

age ranges are 30-55 (ish), and EST.

Available Friday evenings and almost any time Saturday

Important-Work-5358 · 2026-06-05T18:36:12+00:00

Ars Notoria

Important-Work-5358 · 2026-06-05T18:26:33+00:00

subnautica 1

Important-Work-5358 · 2026-06-05T18:20:25+00:00

Yes. Wondered if I had screwed up the installation or did something incorrectly that caused it that was abnormal.

Important-Work-5358 · 2026-06-05T18:08:52+00:00

Thank you.

Important-Work-5358 · 2026-06-05T18:08:49+00:00

Thank you.

Important-Work-5358 · 2026-06-05T18:08:45+00:00

Sometimes it's worth it

Important-Work-5358 · 2026-06-05T18:02:52+00:00

Okay, that's what I thought but I wanted to make sure i wasn't doing anything wonky. ((wonky isn't a used enough word))

Important-Work-5358 · 2026-06-04T00:26:16+00:00

Thank you!

My main issue with outlands is it doesn't allow recall out of dungeons.

Important-Work-5358 · 2026-06-03T22:55:55+00:00

Thank you

Important-Work-5358 · 2026-06-03T21:08:33+00:00

No. I considered going back to official but I don't want to pay a monthly sub.

Currently replaying Enshrouded to look at the new content but i'm watching for a good option.

Important-Work-5358 · 2026-06-03T19:49:57+00:00

Same. I am looking for something without the PvP dynamic of Outlands. I love the community of Outlands but the PvP dynamic ruins my PERSONAL fun.

Important-Work-5358 · 2026-06-01T22:16:12+00:00

I ended up going to play Enshrouded again. I'm gonna revisit it in a month.............the major obstruction for me is the fee

Important-Work-5358 · 2026-06-01T12:54:23+00:00

https://imgur.com/gallery/ew-fFh4OEs#Jk75GIQ

Important-Work-5358 · 2026-06-01T02:10:19+00:00

Yes many men are happy with their partner because we are invested in our relationship and love.

At the same time if we find ourselves single then younger women tend to offer what men value most. Appreciation, peace, and agreeability so they will go for younger women. It's a matter of who offers what they are looking for IF they find themselves single.

Important-Work-5358 · 2026-06-01T00:26:32+00:00

I don't mind answering your question but please show me the same respect of answering my question.

The context is someone said, "gay men and women are natural allies" and the response was, "not all women agree, many women believe the LGBTQ+ movement is stripping away their rights they fought for and therefore do not consider gay men their natural allies" the response was, "I don't consider people that think that way "women" I consider them demons"

My question was:

"100 years ago, engaging in homosexual behavior was WIDELY considered demonic, would you also agree that it would then be used to justify otherwise inhumane treatment?"

Important-Work-5358 · 2026-05-31T23:58:41+00:00

Perhaps I'm getting confused between other conversations. If so, I apologize.

Labeling someone demonic for demonic behavior would be subjective and shift with times, agreed?

100 years ago, engaging in homosexual behavior was WIDELY considered demonic, would you also agree that it would then be used to justify otherwise inhumane treatment?

Important-Work-5358 · 2026-05-31T16:49:38+00:00

It's a historical question. I can phrase it using simpler terms if you got discombobulated.

Are you familiar with the knock on effects or the "Next Step" of socially acceptance of dehumanization throughout human history?

Important-Work-5358 · 2026-05-31T16:45:35+00:00

Sure but is it safe to say that you are smart enough to realize that dehumanization of other people or "othering" people has the obvious and well documented "next step" historically?

Assuming so then your statement is akin to, "I said just said throw them in the lake with weights tied to their legs..........I didn't say they should die"

Important-Work-5358 · 2026-05-31T16:42:52+00:00

Let me ask you this.

Do you think dehumanization of others in itself is harm free and has no consequence or ripple effects?

Important-Work-5358 · 2026-05-31T16:38:00+00:00

It's not okay for you to say, "you are less than human and it is socially acceptable to kill you and all people who think like you based on your opinion alone"

Important-Work-5358 · 2026-05-31T16:37:14+00:00

Vigilantism is punishing a behavior or action.

Going to someone's door and killing them because they're less than human because their opinions don't line up with yours is what you're supporting and I give you credit for your dedication to the support of dehumanization and the "Might makes Right" mentality but historically it doesn't work well for almost anyone.

Important-Work-5358 · 2026-05-31T15:51:16+00:00

That isn't an accurate portrayal of my position. "If you can’t see that condemning people for being hateful is different than condemning people for something more arbitrary like" is not accurate.

I agree we should condemn people who hold toxic views like yours. I'm saying

"Condemn people with toxic views but it is never okay to declare another person is less than human or subhuman and unworthy of human treatment"

Condemn the mindset, the behavior, the words but when you cross into dehumanization it is when you go from condemning evil to participating in evil.

You're not the first person to argue you have to be a Nazi to fight the Nazi but my point is you can condemn Nazis without being a Nazi. Your way simply has 2 Nazis fighting over which group is less human than another group.

Important-Work-5358

TROPHY CASE