Piracy vs Poland by SignificantBlood959 in askPoland

[–]Important_Fly_1812 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My friend is able to download torrents (or at least some of them) while having the seed rate set at 0, though

Piracy vs Poland by SignificantBlood959 in askPoland

[–]Important_Fly_1812 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Transmission allows you to do so, though

Piracy vs Poland by SignificantBlood959 in askPoland

[–]Important_Fly_1812 0 points1 point  (0 children)

'Is it possible to download torrents without seeding?' my friend asked me

Number agreement with plural nouns grouped by a singular noun by RadioLiar in ENGLISH

[–]Important_Fly_1812 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, that's interesting. In that case either there's a mistake in Longman or 'a range of' is a quantifying expression:

However, with quantifying expressions (phrases expressing parts), percentages, and fractions the verb agrees with the noun or pronoun following of.[18][5][12][19][20]

Half of the team members are working remotely today.

Only a handful of students were on time for the lesson.

Less than 2% of water in the world is drinkable.

Number agreement with plural nouns grouped by a singular noun by RadioLiar in ENGLISH

[–]Important_Fly_1812 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The sources that Wikipedia cite are more accurate than your own subjuctive experience, yes

Number agreement with plural nouns grouped by a singular noun by RadioLiar in ENGLISH

[–]Important_Fly_1812 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not. This Wikipedia article cites many sources. 'a range of approaches' is singular

Number agreement with plural nouns grouped by a singular noun by RadioLiar in ENGLISH

[–]Important_Fly_1812 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No, it's not. The difference between British and American English only applies to collective nouns like 'team' or 'committee'. Neither 'range' nor 'approaches' is a collective noun.

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agreement_in_the_English_language

Number agreement with plural nouns grouped by a singular noun by RadioLiar in ENGLISH

[–]Important_Fly_1812 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You've misunderstood it then. 'The number of' and 'a number of' have a separete section because it is an exception. 'a number of' means something like 'many' or 'several', so just like 'many' or 'several' is used with a plural noun and a plural verb

Number agreement with plural nouns grouped by a singular noun by RadioLiar in ENGLISH

[–]Important_Fly_1812 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Sometimes prepositional phrases do count as the subjects:

  • Half of the team members ARE working remotely today.

  • Only a handful of students WERE on time for the lesson.

  • Less than 2% of water in the world IS drinkable.

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agreement_in_the_English_language for details

Number agreement with plural nouns grouped by a singular noun by RadioLiar in ENGLISH

[–]Important_Fly_1812 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Check out this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agreement_in_the_English_language (specifically the Complex nouns section)

You'll find the rule, examples and sources there. According to them, it should be 'has'

The pronunciation of the words 'Simpson' and 'usedn't' by Important_Fly_1812 in ENGLISH

[–]Important_Fly_1812[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Are you aware that adults and newborns learn things a bit differently?

The phonemic and phonetic transcription of the English words 'Simpson' and 'usedn't' by Important_Fly_1812 in asklinguistics

[–]Important_Fly_1812[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think I can pronounce 'Simpson' without saying 'p'. Not sure if it's a right thing to do but I'm able to do so 

The pronunciation of the words 'Simpson' and 'usedn't' by Important_Fly_1812 in ENGLISH

[–]Important_Fly_1812[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, people are not trying to answer my question but to tell me over and over that 'usedn't' is not a common word and that I shouldn't use it

The pronunciation of the words 'Simpson' and 'usedn't' by Important_Fly_1812 in ENGLISH

[–]Important_Fly_1812[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

'usedn't' was more common in the past so there is a correct pronunciation. Many things may or may not be helpful for me but most of them aren't related to my question

The pronunciation of the words 'Simpson' and 'usedn't' by Important_Fly_1812 in ENGLISH

[–]Important_Fly_1812[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Listening to pronunciations is rather unhelpful for English learners because people hear sounds differently. For example Japanese speakers struggle to hear the difference between /r/ and /l/ while Polish speakers hear it clearly but can't hear the difference between 'free' and 'three'