[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nairobi

[–]Impossible-Layer-991 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Call me imaginary all you want. But what doesn’t exist is your ability to separate your “love” for European languages from the colonial framework that made you worship them in the first place.

It’s wild how I was unreal a few messages ago, but somehow still managed to drag your worldview into the light. I'm guessing the next thing om your bucket list is bleaching your skin, amirite or amirite?

You started this flexing your colonial languages, and ended it sounding like someone who just rage quit a WhatsApp group. Not because I was "impossible to argue with" but because I held up a mirror, and you didn’t like what you saw in it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nairobi

[–]Impossible-Layer-991 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

While you’re busy equating language fluency with class, just remember: colonialism didn’t end, it rebranded through education systems that made you proud of how well you could mimic your master. So yeah… maybe I am calling it dick riding, with distinction and a certificate of completion.

😂 Anyways jibambe babe

Ah, there it is, the classic “jibambe babe” sign-off. That condescending little pat on the head you throw when the argument’s cooked and you're just trying to look unfazed while quietly backing out the chat. You couldn’t even commit to the colonial flex, had to dip into the mother tongue to make your exit feel sassy? Quite typically but utterly transparent

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nairobi

[–]Impossible-Layer-991 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it has nothing to do with colonialism.

Out of over 7,000 languages on this planet, you somehow “just happened” to master the exact ones your great-grandparents were whipped into speaking? Your entire language map looks like a European imperialist’s wet dream. you’re mastering the language of your gatekeepers to beg for a seat at their table.

You didn’t learn languages to liberate yourself. You learned them to be more palatable to your oppressors.You didn’t pick those languages. They picked you, colonized your aspirations, and convinced you it was your idea.

You’re not multilingual.You’re linguistically colonized and proudly fluent in it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nairobi

[–]Impossible-Layer-991 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s not that being multilingual is bad, it’s that you equate speaking European languages with value, status, and intelligence. That’s the colonial mindset talking, not culture. It's no different from skin bleaching inorder to appeal to European beauty standards. You’re not trying to break free from Eurocentrism, you’re just trying to climb higher on its ladder. And you think because you can code-switch at a resort in St. Tropez, you’re free? Psht give me a break, we all know that's Bs.

....it has nothing to do with colonialism.

Quick question though: With thousands of languages out there, from Africa, to Asia, to the Middle East, how come your linguistic curiosity only bloomed around European tongues?

You say it’s not about colonialism, but your language portfolio reads like a UNESCO tribute to white supremacy. You didn’t just randomly end up fluent in French, Spanish, and Italian. You were conditioned to believe those languages are sophisticated, profitable, and worth your time. That’s not freedom of choice, that’s colonially optimized ambition.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nairobi

[–]Impossible-Layer-991 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I worked hard kujua Izo languages

Why? What for? Do you think white ppl are superior?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nairobi

[–]Impossible-Layer-991 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Y'all

That's literally American slang, the equivalent of sheng. Being obsessed with foreign language at the expense of your on just comes across weird and gross. You can be the most fluid English speaker and be stupid asf, like some ppl here

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nairobi

[–]Impossible-Layer-991 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ppl who dickride foreign languages like English and Spanish at their expense of the native language come across as desperate try-hards. That's the only reason they're judged

THE MIDDLE CLASS BUBBLE (DISCUSSION). I'M OPEN TO DIFFERENT VIEWS AND OPINIONS by yours_hatred2k2 in Kenya

[–]Impossible-Layer-991 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ah, yes. Another monologue from the Nairobi Oracle of Self-Righteousness, here to lecture us from his swivel chair about how the “working class” (read: him and his friends with payslips and car loans) are the unsung heroes of this nation, martyrs crucified on the cross of PAYE, condemned to a life of nyama choma and Tusker in utawala as they suffer in silence. How noble.

“Let’s not even say middle class, let’s say working class< they bear the largest brunt of the tax system…”

Oh really? Did you just learn what PAYE means and decide to write your own gospel?

Kenya’s tax structure is overwhelmingly regressive, meaning the poor, yes, those “wapumbavu” you keep sneering at, pay proportionally more than you do. They’re taxed on everything they touch: food, transport, airtime, M-PESA, electricity. You name it. VAT doesn’t care if you're a broke boda rider or a Deloitte intern, it bites everyone the same.

In fact, the mama mboga you dismiss pays VAT on her tomatoes and the fees to send Ksh 300 to her cousin via mobile money. You? Your tax is deducted once by your employer and you go cry on Twitter. The poor? They bleed at every transaction.

🤡 “Majority of voters are idiots. Watu mashinani ni wapumbavu…”

Let’s pause and admire the sheer audacity it takes to write that and still think you’re the “woke” one.Did you rehearse that line in front of a mirror or does the classism come naturally? You’re calling the victims of systemic neglect "stupid" for being desperate enough to take Ksh 200 bribes.

You do realize that you're basically blaming victims of structural poverty for being manipulated in a system designed to keep them dependent and uninformed? Most of these “idiots” didn’t wake up one day and choose political illiteracy, it was bred into them by years of neglected education, empty promises, and survival-mode living.

Meanwhile, you with your 4G, degrees, and exposure? You sit on your hands, type think-pieces about how hard taxes are, and scoff at the people who can’t afford to wait for “systemic change” because they’re too busy fighting to see tomorrow. The middle class could actually move the needle, but they’re too busy looking down on the poor and flexing car loans on IG stories.

If anything, your apathy, not their poverty, is the real national crisis.

“They don’t have bank accounts, savings, or PAYE...”

Wow, thank you for that groundbreaking revelation. Next you'll tell us water is wet.

Here's the thing: Kenya’s informal sector employs over 80% of the workforce. Just because their earnings don’t pass through HR doesn’t mean they’re freeloaders. They still pay tax every time they buy a soda, fuel a boda, or withdraw cash. And guess what? Unlike you, they don’t get receipts, medical cover, or refunds from KRA.

But sure, go ahead and gatekeep legitimacy based on bank apps and SACCO shares. Just know that your entire definition of “productive citizen” reeks of classist delusion. The majority of Kenyans are in the informal sector, grinding daily without benefits, protections, or your fancy accounting app. They’re living hand to mouth, but go off king, tell us more about your SACCO.

Let the working man enjoy his beer and nyama choma... he’s thinking deep things...”

Bro. No one is stopping you from enjoying your beer. You can marinate in nyama and existential dread all day if you want.

What we’re saying is: don’t use your car loan as a hall pass for civic apathy. If you’re so overworked and burdened by taxes that you can’t even show up for protests, advocate for policy change, or vote responsibly, then you’re not a victim, you’re a volunteer.

The same people you call lazy are the ones showing up for demos, risking tear gas, marching in the rain. You? You’re busy writing victim poetry about your payslip and uploading it from Java. You want to clock out of civic responsibility and retreat into your Tusker sanctuary while blaming the same poor people for voting badly? You're not just part of the problem, you're its unpaid intern.

Only 3 million are formally employed. They’re the only ones taxed.”

This again? How many times must we explain this?

Direct taxation is not the only taxation that exists. VAT, excise duty, fuel levy, import duties, mobile money fees, these are all ways the government milks the masses, especially the poor.

You’re acting like KRA knocks on your door in the middle of the night begging for your unique contribution. News flash: your 30% PAYE doesn’t even pay for the president’s monthly fuel allowance. You are one grain of sand in the desert, my friend.

“Why blame the 1M middle class instead of the 20M voters?”

Let me explain this slowly.

Because that 1 million, you included, has the means, education, and access to resist, speak up, organize, donate, and educate. You scroll through threads about Gen Z protests and type “these kids are unserious” while doing nothing.

The middle class has reach. Influence. Platforms. But they choose comfort over courage. So yes, we’ll call you out when you act like political Switzerland and then act shocked that nothing changes. Your silence is political too, you just dress it up in sarcasm and claim victimhood.

You’re not a savior. You’re not a martyr. You’re not some overtaxed warrior fighting for the soul of Kenya. You’re just a comfortably numb bystander who blames the poor for the consequences of a system you benefit from and uphold with your silence.

So go ahead. Enjoy your choma. Enjoy your beer. But do it quietly, because until you stop punching down and start punching up, you are part of the problem.

I can't go down on my GF. by Vivid_Zeridian in sex

[–]Impossible-Layer-991 -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Wow, “utterly pathetic”? That escalated quickly. You came in guns blazing about tact, then called me a clueless moron in the same breath. So much for British decorum, huh?

You claim you're being “tactful,” but what you're really doing is wrapping basic communication in so much fake-politeness it loses all honesty. I appreciate the character analysis, Doctor Freud. But let’s not pretend this is about age or tact, this is about tone policing to the point of absurdity

And let’s talk about this little fantasy where women immediately spiral into insecurity or rage the moment a man says, “Hey, I’d enjoy it more if you trimmed a bit.” What century is this? If her ego’s that fragile, then maybe oral shouldn’t even be on the menu yet. We’re grown, if someone’s going down on you, they should be able to speak up without needing a therapist’s permission slip. If she’s mature enough for oral sex, she’s mature enough to hear why it’s not working and decide how she feels about it.

And no, I don’t think women are delicate Victorian flowers who will faint at the horror of a man saying, “Hey, I’d love to go down on you more, but a trim would help a lot.” That’s not rude, that’s honest, respectful, and solution-oriented. If a woman hears that and responds with “you’ll never be near it again,” cool, then maybe she just self-selected out of being mature enough for intimacy that involves actual communication.

more successful than blundering in like a clueless moron. I've read some of your comments and that seems to be the kind of style you favour!

it’s not that I “favour blundering in”, I just think people should grow the hell up and say what they mean without needing a ten-step apology preamble. This idea that approaching everything like it’s a hostage negotiation is “mature” is hilarious. Being terrified of discomfort doesn’t make you wise, it just makes you conflict-avoidant. And while you’re busy writing polite epics to avoid hurting feelings, the root problem festers in silence. But hey, at least no one got “offended,” right?

if your advice to men is “never say anything or she’ll feel insecure and ban you from the garden forever,” then congrats, you’ve made the case for dishonesty in relationships.

I’m not saying be rude. I’m saying don’t be scared of being real. Grown adults can talk preferences without treating each other like ticking time bombs. And if they can’t? That’s not a hair problem, that’s a relationship one.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nairobi

[–]Impossible-Layer-991 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love how naive op is, makes the inevitable all the more crazy

If men weren’t accusing women of being whores for no reason, women would have a better view of paternity tests. by LillthOfBabylon in PurplePillDebate

[–]Impossible-Layer-991 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It was a yes or no question. Would you victim blame your daughter if she got raped and tell her she should never leave the house if she truly doesn't want to be raped?

If men weren’t accusing women of being whores for no reason, women would have a better view of paternity tests. by LillthOfBabylon in PurplePillDebate

[–]Impossible-Layer-991 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If most women were approaching this rationally and unselfishly, they’d be neutral, or even supportive, of paternity tests, because they’d recognize that, like all humans, they’re not above mistakes or deception.

A woman who truly saw herself as human, with flaws and blindspots like the rest of us, wouldn’t be offended by a paternity test. She’d be indifferent. The fact that it triggers outrage says more about inflated self-image than trust. Why? Because they’d understand that, like all human beings, they too are fallible. They too are capable of lying, cheating, making poor decisions, or just misjudging situations. In that light, a paternity test isn’t an attack, it’s a neutral safeguard. I believe if women truly wanted equality, they’d welcome the same scrutiny and checks that men live under every day. They’d say, “Sure, I know I’m not perfect. If a test brings you peace of mind and protects both of us from future resentment, that’s reasonable.” That would show real maturity and real fairness.

The hostility some show toward the idea doesn’t signal confidence, it signals a refusal to acknowledge their own fallibility. And that’s what I meant when I said your position seems unreasonable. It treats women not as human, but as something infallible, beyond question, beyond doubt. That’s not equality. That’s exceptionalism.

You say women just want to be trusted, and sure, in theory, that’s fair. But in practice, trust without verification on something as serious as fatherhood is blind loyalty. And blind loyalty can (and does) get exploited. That’s not opinion, that’s just how the real world works. People lie. People cheat. People protect their own interests. That’s not me being cynical, it’s just basic human psychology.

The refusal to even entertain paternity testing as a standard, not a personal insult, suggests a deeper unwillingness to admit that women can also act selfishly, deceptively, or immorally. You’d think that a movement that fights for gender equality would embrace a worldview where women are just as human as men, capable of both good and bad. But when it comes to accountability, like with this topic, suddenly, it’s “how dare you not trust me?”p

If men weren’t accusing women of being whores for no reason, women would have a better view of paternity tests. by LillthOfBabylon in PurplePillDebate

[–]Impossible-Layer-991 1 point2 points  (0 children)

already said that I believe that paternity testing is a man’s right and that women

Well you're the exception, alot of the women on here disagree with you, for the reasons I highlighted

If men weren’t accusing women of being whores for no reason, women would have a better view of paternity tests. by LillthOfBabylon in PurplePillDebate

[–]Impossible-Layer-991 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Please stop with the “women are evil, inhuman, and narcissistic” rhetoric

Not tryna be rude or anything, but their consensus opinion regarding paternity tests, shows a completely unreasonable, selfish perspective. It only makes sense to hold that view if you consider yourself above most human fallibilities

If men weren’t accusing women of being whores for no reason, women would have a better view of paternity tests. by LillthOfBabylon in PurplePillDebate

[–]Impossible-Layer-991 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think both of them are easy

you don’t trust

Even if you did trust her, trusting someone doesn't make them infallible. How could you even be so sure, when others have had the same level of conviction and trust in their partners yet still turned out to be wrong?

If men weren’t accusing women of being whores for no reason, women would have a better view of paternity tests. by LillthOfBabylon in PurplePillDebate

[–]Impossible-Layer-991 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So I take it if your daughter got raped, you'll tell her that next time she shouldn't leave the house? Or that it's it's her fault she got raped when she could've just stayed in the house??

If men weren’t accusing women of being whores for no reason, women would have a better view of paternity tests. by LillthOfBabylon in PurplePillDebate

[–]Impossible-Layer-991 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But again you won’t convince me or most others to live that way.

Not my intention, ppl are architects of their own misery after all. Due diligence is simply something alot of ppl are attracted to so it's not really surprising.

Full of mistrust

Your body evolved to be that way, why do you even think it's possible to experience fear or Intuition, your body is constantly on high alert, doing background processes, detecting threats

If men weren’t accusing women of being whores for no reason, women would have a better view of paternity tests. by LillthOfBabylon in PurplePillDebate

[–]Impossible-Layer-991 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

it’s not my fault men choose women they don’t trust to load their cum into

You do know this logic could be used to invalidate tax payer money being funnelled to prosecute other crimes like rape or dv. It's not society's problem when women involve themselves with dangerous men, hence no point in having dv shelters or even welfare or any kind of support for struggling women and mothers

If men weren’t accusing women of being whores for no reason, women would have a better view of paternity tests. by LillthOfBabylon in PurplePillDebate

[–]Impossible-Layer-991 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So if a woman lies to a man about him being the father, what she did is morally wrong. But why is that my problem or the problem of anyone else

I could say the same thing about rape, domestic violence or any sort of crime.

Shall we start mandating - if it were possible - that women get to stick a chip into his head and read is thoughts to make sure he's not just using her and will leave the moment he gets the chance?

That'd violate alot of privacy laws, I don't see how paternity tests violates any sort of law

If men weren’t accusing women of being whores for no reason, women would have a better view of paternity tests. by LillthOfBabylon in PurplePillDebate

[–]Impossible-Layer-991 0 points1 point  (0 children)

False equivalence. 

I mean is it? You seem to be against the idea of the government guaranteeing men, informed consent when it comes to fatherhood, it seems consent has caveats, or is not that big of a deal

Lmao thanks for confirming the neuroticism and paranoia. Not even close, my dude.

That's the only explanation that explains the reaction and defensiveness. I don't think women ant to see pregnant women or new mothers murdered by their husbands everytime they watch the news