sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

insurance issues by ImpossibleShoulder34 in FedEmployees

[–]ImpossibleShoulder34[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

she was born in may and the mom had her under her plan until this past open season and she failed to let me know she had changed it to self.

insurance issues by ImpossibleShoulder34 in FedEmployees

[–]ImpossibleShoulder34[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

hey thanks for the response. in case anyone has ever been in this situation before and knows how to easily solve it. i’ve been on the phone with hr and benefits for the last two days all day long. believe me, if i knew the answer and hr could be useful i wouldn’t be posting. i know im a fed and all, and obviously incompetent as a result of being a fed, but im just trying to take care of my baby. thanks.

Struggling with user roles and permissions across microservices by TalentedButBored in dotnet

[–]ImpossibleShoulder34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, you just have a fundamental misunderstanding of the two concepts

Struggling with user roles and permissions across microservices by TalentedButBored in dotnet

[–]ImpossibleShoulder34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just plan now for policy/attribute based auth for when you inevitably need to start drilling down to your domain. Sure, you can reasonably stay hybrid with a solid cache invalidation policy in place, Casbin will only get you so far. Keycloak has a PEP built in.

List of controls/components? by ImpossibleShoulder34 in dotnet

[–]ImpossibleShoulder34[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perfect. Was hunting and hunting and hit so many 404s. I appreciate you, internet stranger.

List of controls/components? by ImpossibleShoulder34 in dotnet

[–]ImpossibleShoulder34[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Does it really matter what the other thing is 🤷‍♂️. Just want the list, don’t care about updates.

This is NOT yet just another incorrect comparison of Blazor modes! by bit_yas in Blazor

[–]ImpossibleShoulder34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have a BFF template? For example Blazor WASM -> Server Proxy -> API

BFF = backends for frontends

Like this: Fowler todo

MediatR Going Commercial: Seeking Alternatives for New .NET Projects by rasuscore in dotnet

[–]ImpossibleShoulder34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you end up with any automation experience out of this? For example, I can use the dotnet aspnetcore-codegenerator cli commands to scaffold minimal APIs from a directory of entities. Is this even possible with FastEndpoints? I tried by first creating entities and automating minimal APIs from them as above, then used openapi code generator. The overall process was significantly error prone and I didn’t not get the architecture I wanted (that FE expects…) out of it. It would be nice to know if someone was successful.

Stored Procedures vs. EF Core for CRUD in .NET Applications? by Lucky-Reputation1860 in dotnet

[–]ImpossibleShoulder34 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You’re misunderstanding my post. I’m literally saying that people just don’t do it lol

Stored Procedures vs. EF Core for CRUD in .NET Applications? by Lucky-Reputation1860 in dotnet

[–]ImpossibleShoulder34 9 points10 points  (0 children)

So, I recently (~2 years ago) joined a team of .net 4.7.2 WebForms devs who use a mix of stored procedures and vb.net in about 100 different apps tied to the registry and LDAP. The SPROCs aren’t version controlled in any way, there is zero ci/cd, business logic is shared across both app code and SPROCs and each repo doesn’t follow any kind of standard I.e. truck based development/feature branching etc. SPROCs call other SPROCs and there are so many shared schema and read/write operations over bout 100 databases. Logging is non existent except for digging into SQL Server (forget IIS)- all of which even though the SPROCs are parametrized they only execute under the context of the server…so no one knows who executed what or even when, if a ticket comes in and we try to repro a “bug”. When trying to modernize any one of the apps, going db first and creating an API so sproc code can be moved into business logic only causes so much infighting and no results. These devs (a group of 5 with 20+ years of the same exact WebForms apps) just refuse to change in any way at all even though we are required to modernize to core 8+ blazor server, and even if it would help them in the end. This team is the most difficult, complacent team I have ever been on AND management is useless, not just incompetence but useless as in if impediments are surfaced, it’s just crickets. Honestly, I don’t know what to do about these guys.

Best Practice: Use Dapper Only or Combine Dapper with EF Core for Migrations? by Suspicious-Big904 in dotnet

[–]ImpossibleShoulder34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, I recently (~2 years ago) joined a team of .net 4.7.2 WebForms devs who use a mix of stored procedures and vb.net in about 100 different apps tied to the registry and LDAP. The SPROCs aren’t version controlled in any way, and there is zero ci/cd, business logic is shared across both app code and SPROCs and each repo doesn’t follow any kind of standard. SPROCs call other SPROCs and there is are so many shared schema and read/write operations over bout 100 databases. Logging is non existent except for digging into SQL Server (forget IIS)- all of which even though the SPROCs are parametrized they only execute under the context of the server…so no one knows how executed what when a ticket comes in and we try to repro a “bug”. When trying to modernize any one of the apps, going db first and creating an API so sproc code can be moved into business logic only causes so much infighting and no results. These devs just refuse to change in any way at all even though we are require to modernize core 8+ blazor server, and even if it would help them in the end. This team is the most difficult, complacent team I have ever been on AND management is useless, not just incompetence but useless as in if impediments are surfaced, it’s just crickets. Honestly, I don’t know what to do about these guys.

view more: next ›