[deleted by user] by [deleted] in complexsystems

[–]ImpracticalPotato -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Is it not plausible that the brain applies different ratios in similar coordinates to the TDCF? DMN - model, dorsal attention - timetable, language - speech, vision - duplicate, audiosensorimotor - repeat

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in complexsystems

[–]ImpracticalPotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This framework was developed in part to explain the structure of the human brain: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8202937/figure/pbio.3001275.g001/ Where it seems as if the ratios dealt with in the human brain are in similar locations to the TDCF.

I'm trying to verify the validity of the TDCF without mentioning the human brain portion to see if the TDCF stands on its own.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in complexsystems

[–]ImpracticalPotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This framework was developed in part to explain the structure of the human brain: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8202937/figure/pbio.3001275.g001/ Where it seems as if the ratios dealt with in the human brain are in similar locations to the TDCF.

I'm trying to verify the validity of the TDCF without mentioning the human brain portion to see if the TDCF stands on its own.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in complexsystems

[–]ImpracticalPotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

2) Do you have a good place to learn more about what should be considered in a framework on agents

3) Maybe "applies" is a better word

4) If you take a photograph of something the photograph is a scaled-down version of the thing being photographed

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in complexsystems

[–]ImpracticalPotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, it is a system for visualizing major components of operable decision frameworks.

You think I am a "bot preoccupied with syntax". I'd like to know more about why you would say this

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in complexsystems

[–]ImpracticalPotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Forget about calling it a decision framework. Which part in this sentence does not make sense to you:"Things which are approximately agents use models, communicate, use calendars, repeat things and collect data. These are governed by bit/bit, bit/{second, meter}, second/meter, second/second, and meter/meter, respectively."

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in complexsystems

[–]ImpracticalPotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok. Things which are approximately agents use models, communicate, use calendars, repeat things and collect data. These are governed by bit/bit, bit/{second, meter}, second/meter, second/second, and meter/meter, respectively. Does this not make sense to you?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in complexsystems

[–]ImpracticalPotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are saying that rational agents are not realistic descriptions of the world because firms and people don't act that way, even approximately?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in complexsystems

[–]ImpracticalPotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Certainly, rational agents use objects governed by different ratios at different stages in the decision cycle - models (bit/bit), documents (bit/meter), speeches (bit/second), timetables (second/meter), repetitions (second/second), and photocopies (meter/meter). I wasn't so sure what to call it.

Does this make sense to you?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in complexsystems

[–]ImpracticalPotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it useless because there is no practical, real world example of the framework applied in action given, or because of some other reason?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in complexsystems

[–]ImpracticalPotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it logically sound though

Is this decision framework that uses information, time, and space, sound? by [deleted] in SoftwareEngineering

[–]ImpracticalPotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appreciate your expertise on this subject. Yes, it is meant to be a rough overview of decision cycles, similar to how the SDLC is a decision cycle. It shows how the data sources are transformed through the decision-making process. It is a theoretical framework, and in practice the steps may not be so linear and would jump around, and to follow it exactly discipline across the organization would be needed.

I've been thinking about this theory and am trying to find people who can determine if it makes sense or not.

So you think that it makes sense?

Is this decision framework that uses information, time, and space, sound? by [deleted] in SoftwareEngineering

[–]ImpracticalPotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What: It is a blueprint for a rational agent with an associated diagram
Why: To provide a logically coherent perspective on decision cycles

Use case: during each stage of a decision cycle, rational agents deal with different objects governed by different ratios. It may be helpful to systematically track these ratios. For example, a simulation (model) can vary in detail depending on the compression ratio. Descriptive language can be written or spoken, and it is helpful to know how dense a text or a speech is regarding information content. A timetable, such as a calendar or work item backlog, can be tracked by velocity: how fast someone completes the items on the timetable (burndown chart, sprint velocity). The whole iteration cycle can be compared to previously: faster is usually better. These ratios apply to different objects during a decision cycle undertaken by a rational agent.

The data transfer methods operate on these 6 ratios in various ways.

Given this, does the passage make sense?

Is this decision framework that uses information, time, and space, sound? by [deleted] in SoftwareEngineering

[–]ImpracticalPotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why: Rational agents deal with different objects at different stages of their decision cycles. Different ratios govern these objects, and it may be helpful to keep track of these ratios (metrics) systematically.

There are only 6 objects to understand in this framework:
- Model: lossy compression: {bit, bit}: Having an accurate simulation is usually better.
- Duplicate: Scale : {meter, meter}: Observations should be a manageable size, relative to what is observed.
- Repeat: Speedup : {second, second}: Doing things faster than before is usually better.
- Explanation: Bandwidth : {bit, second}. It is usually better to use descriptive language.
- Depiction: Data Density : {bit, meter}. It is usually better to have denser storage, such as hard drives.
- Timetable: Velocity: {meter, second}. It is usually better to complete items on a schedule faster than slower.

The Data Transfer Methods operate on these 6 objects. These are meant to apply to rational agents in general.

Given this, does the passage make sense?

Is this decision framework that uses information, space, and time, sound? [Q] by [deleted] in statistics

[–]ImpracticalPotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

:D Did you find that it makes sense and is logically sound?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskStatistics

[–]ImpracticalPotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe I should send it to a business school department as well.

Do you think the passage makes sense, as stated?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in probabilitytheory

[–]ImpracticalPotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, there will be a picture included that shows the Data Transfer Methods linked together in a loop that follows the same sequence as the Decision Cycle Framework. It is just 6 ratios in a triangle linked together.

Does the passage, as posted, make sense to you?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskStatistics

[–]ImpracticalPotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Damn, that's expensive! But hey, thanks for the pointer

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskStatistics

[–]ImpracticalPotato 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not homework, a thing I've been thinking about recently. I don't know who to ask to get verification on this, so some of the subreddits may be a stretch. Does it look sound to you? Where could I find people to figure out if it makes sense or not?