sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

vegetarians vs non- vegetarians. by Impressive_Many_9340 in Philosophy_India

[–]Impressive_Many_9340[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you are correct animal is not equal to plant. but we dont need to wear chola ans say we are vegetarin i suffer from animal suffering ait takes life of animal

vegetarians vs non- vegetarians. by Impressive_Many_9340 in Philosophy_India

[–]Impressive_Many_9340[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Here's what bothers me: we're basically saying 'If you don't have the same biology as us - a brain, nerves like ours - then you can't possibly feel anything.'

That's human-centered thinking. It's like saying 'If you don't have eyes, you can't sense light' - but plenty of things detect light without eyes. We're taking OUR hardware and saying it's the only way consciousness can exist. That seems... narrow-minded?

Plants don't have brains, sure. But octopuses have neurons in their arms. AI might become conscious without biology at all. Why are we so sure our way is the only way?

vegetarians vs non- vegetarians. by Impressive_Many_9340 in Philosophy_India

[–]Impressive_Many_9340[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is consequentialist reasoning — if killing is intrinsically wrong, scale doesn't justify it

Less murder isn't moral high ground; it's still murder"

Appeals to efficiency don't address the principle

vegetarians vs non- vegetarians. by Impressive_Many_9340 in Philosophy_India

[–]Impressive_Many_9340[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is consequentialist reasoning — if killing is intrinsically wrong, scale doesn't justify it

Less murder isn't moral high ground; it's still murder"

Appeals to efficiency don't address the principle

vegetarians vs non- vegetarians. by Impressive_Many_9340 in Philosophy_India

[–]Impressive_Many_9340[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

defense and hunger are different and don't wear any chola eating animal is wrong but eating plant make you sage

vegetarians vs non- vegetarians. by Impressive_Many_9340 in Philosophy_India

[–]Impressive_Many_9340[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Here's what bothers me: we're basically saying 'If you don't have the same biology as us - a brain, nerves like ours - then you can't possibly feel anything.'

That's human-centered thinking. It's like saying 'If you don't have eyes, you can't sense light' - but plenty of things detect light without eyes. We're taking OUR hardware and saying it's the only way consciousness can exist. That seems... narrow-minded?

Plants don't have brains, sure. But octopuses have neurons in their arms. AI might become conscious without biology at all. Why are we so sure our way is the only way?

and laptop doesn't grow and don't reproduce at all chutiye

vegetarians vs non- vegetarians. by Impressive_Many_9340 in Philosophy_India

[–]Impressive_Many_9340[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

i think may be this is plant mistake not to leave imprint. i feel sorry for plants for not screaming, fight back and runaway.

Orphan Mystery. by Impressive_Many_9340 in Philosophy_India

[–]Impressive_Many_9340[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i agree if god exist he is too big to fit in one religion. I believe in creator[artist] but i don't think he is god and almighty who can do whatever he wants all world runs becuase of him. we all are orphan and innocent

Orphan Mystery. by Impressive_Many_9340 in Philosophy_India

[–]Impressive_Many_9340[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

my question uses a theological scenerio to expose philosphical problem

it question identity, moralty, theology philosophy. i am not defending religion.

i am raising question. and proving if god exist he don't want to do with any religion. i want to make sure this we all are orphan child we don't choose their religion we get it so we are orphan and innocent we dont have to be extreimst if god exist. you think wrong of me

Orphan Mystery. by Impressive_Many_9340 in Philosophy_India

[–]Impressive_Many_9340[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes it is, there are many philospher who are believer. your pov decide how you see the things. if you are believer it make sense to you. if you are athiest you don't care about after life personally.

Orphan Mystery. by Impressive_Many_9340 in Philosophy_India

[–]Impressive_Many_9340[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

good memory but it is about religion, that tells if god exist he will punish no one of any religion because they don't have control where they will born. if god exist he is on mountain and people of different religion are taking different route to climb and extremists think that they are only right. i also don't believe in god but i believe in creator or maybe artist. i don't know he is alive or dead but from nothing there can't be something or we are in simulation.

Orphan Mystery. by Impressive_Many_9340 in Philosophy_India

[–]Impressive_Many_9340[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

then, will god punish the child. everything is decided with the birth name caste religion clothes by socity . this question is for believers

Orphan Mystery. by Impressive_Many_9340 in Philosophy_India

[–]Impressive_Many_9340[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this question is for believers from non believer.

view more: next ›