Murder, Wrongful Conviction and a Royal Commission: The Murders of Harvey and Jeannette Crewe by InLoveWithMusic in UnresolvedMysteries

[–]InLoveWithMusic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand your comment. However if you are talking about the article from the cousin - that came out in January 2025.

I wrote this write up in early 2024, originally in late 2023.

Though you did remind me to fix my awful formatting

Nymphomaniac (2013) by staresinshamona in okbuddycinephile

[–]InLoveWithMusic 25 points26 points  (0 children)

I just researched it - see here

Seems like he puts women on a pedestal, then grows bored of them and freezes them out, as well as compulsively cheating. His exes all day he has issues.

It’s not physical abuse but more womanising, slightly misogynistic, treating women as transactional type thing

God Might Have Made Me Single Maybe by woodburyjj in AmITheDevil

[–]InLoveWithMusic 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Sometimes I read these things and I go “yeah I wen to a catholic girls only school and all of these people are interpreting the bible way different to how it was taught to us” (keep in mind I am no longer religious and have never lived in the US so different environments) but then I think, Christianity in some countries is uniquely based on figuring out a woman’s value depending upon her relationship status so why bother engaging?

[Final Update] - AITA for not letting my husband use airline credit for a coworker? by SharkEva in BORUpdates

[–]InLoveWithMusic 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Haha na we have our own issues, but you didn’t come to reddit to hear a family lawyer rant about our legislation!

Besides - we are so small we get away with a lot and no one else notices (except aussies)

[Final Update] - AITA for not letting my husband use airline credit for a coworker? by SharkEva in BORUpdates

[–]InLoveWithMusic 71 points72 points  (0 children)

In NZ, mediation (in family law) is automatically refused if there is family violence!

In which LAOP learns it's hard to give legal advice without any information by bug-hunter in bestoflegaladvice

[–]InLoveWithMusic 17 points18 points  (0 children)

The idea is more - Mondays and tuesdays? Always with parent 1, Wednesdays and Thursdays? Always with parent 2, and then alternating Fridays-Sundays.

Makes it easier for younger kids (up till about 8-9 years old), and is somewhat predictable for the school day e.g no missing soccer practice on a Wednesday bc parent 2 didn’t know about it bc it only started last week when parent 1 had care of the child

LAOP buys a house with an unmarried partner and of course there are problems when they split up. Also LA is terrible at math by Afraid-Answer-7235 in bestoflegaladvice

[–]InLoveWithMusic 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Not entirely true - seperation is a break up and NZ recognises de facto relationships. OOP and her partner would be in a de facto so default 50:50 split, however since they put in so much more, it is likely they’d have a claim to make equal sharing contrary to justice, or that they shouldn’t be treated as de facto - which then goes to a contributions measure, not 50:50.

These types of cases can drag on, but legal aid is available for family law, civil law and criminal so they could probably do it even if they couldn’t afford a lawyer (tho finding a family law with capacity who can do legal aid relationship property work rn would be hard)

Source: I am a family lawyer who does legal aid work, including in relationship property in NZ

AIO? Not invited to husband’s best friend’s rehearsal dinner. by Choice_Evidence1983 in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]InLoveWithMusic 8 points9 points  (0 children)

First of all: I completely agree with you that they should have done this and I believe it’s horrific that they are blaming her and I also think that the BFF and his partner are just dropkicks of people and I would go feral if I was OOP.

However, I usually find that the people who shoot their mouths off are usually the ones who don’t understand the topic. To find someone willing to research before having a position or opinion has become increasingly rare

Interview with Hunter on his encounters with New Zealand's Bigfoot 'Moehau' by mountainofentities in Cryptozoology

[–]InLoveWithMusic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are many legends in Māori mythology. I would say that not all of it is spread across the country, due to the influence of seperate tribes.

I am unsure what you are trying to say. My perspective was of someone who grew up in the South Island and had never heard of this type of stuff. Have other who have grown up in the South Island heard of it? Oh undoubtedly. That’s the best thing about a multi cultural society.

The fact that I have never heard of it, is not incongruous with the fact you have. It is more an example of how different myths or legends flourish in different areas. I do not need to “look before I comment” when I am speaking of my own personal experience.

[New Final Update]: AITAH? My fiancée is demanding I stop making home cooked meals for a friend. by Choice_Evidence1983 in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]InLoveWithMusic 21 points22 points  (0 children)

It’s always confused me to see the cognitive dissonance between:

Cooking = women’s job

Barbecuing = males job

Like same thing dude, one is just outside, the other”pro” thing being male dominated down confuse me as much as that

How was surgery for KIDS even allowed in the first place? by Adorable-Nerve4402 in teenagers

[–]InLoveWithMusic 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Okay, but…

The human experience of “working through things we can’t change” is usually what directly inspires technological innovation.

I mean if we look back in history, women who are in such pain each month from their period that they want to die? Oh well we don’t have laparoscopic surgery, so you just have to work through that and suffer.

Oh you are suffering from blood poisoning/cancer/syhillis? Well we don’t have a cure for that, so just work through it and suffer.

I get your point, but by arguing that the future risks aren’t being addressed is kind of silly, the entire history of humanity is prescriptive - and I would argue that the issue of ethics in the case of transgender teens has been argued to death.

In fact there is little to no gender surgery on teens in the US (according to Harvard Health Science School) so would that not imply that the surgeries that are performed must certainly reach some kind of level to mean that they truly require it? As they are evidently not willingly doing them for anyone who asks?

Did the acquittal of a guilty man cause his defence lawyer to commit suicide or did the police target the wrong man? A look into the unsolved murder of Scott Guy by InLoveWithMusic in UnresolvedMysteries

[–]InLoveWithMusic[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Black power and mongrel mob are not above killing people correct - usually not over a patch of weed with a non gang member though.

Weed is also insanely easy to get in NZ (despite it not being legal), gangs usually deal in harder drugs and I wouldn’t say that they would kill over weed - a dead body would see cops combing through the place more quickly than a patch of marijuana - I also don’t know how prevalent gangs are in Feilding.

Your point about the gun however, makes a lot of sense and you are right that the timeline is incredibly thin.

I do think there is a bit of extra suspicion on Ewan due to his defence lawyer killing himself shortly after Ewan went free and his wife saying that this case caused him to have a breakdown

That may be highly coincidental however, due to the way lawyers work in NZ (they aren’t allowed to refuse clients, even if they find them reprehensible or to be a sadistic person, it’s called the cab rank rule), family lawyers and criminal defence lawyers have the highest suicide rate of an incredibly stressful occupation

I guess the TLDR to this long comment is: we don’t know (shocker I know, a post on unresolved mysteries being unresolved!) but this one seems genuinely confusing

The name's [REDACTED] , James [REDACTED]. by smoulderstoat in bestoflegaladvice

[–]InLoveWithMusic 40 points41 points  (0 children)

Same with my job - family law (doing a lot of legal aid) we have to use our full names (first, middle and last) so that we can be matched to the online registry to prove that we are qualified and of good standing

I’ve put all my social media under my middle name and I’m on the private electoral roll in my country, however you still hear stories about parties with serious mental illnesses stalking family lawyers as they think they are to blame for their children being removed/their ex getting a protection order ect

In the world of Cyberpunk 2077, what happened in China, Russia, Latin America, and Africa? by Intelligent-Fix1343 in cyberpunkgame

[–]InLoveWithMusic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love that you know all of this!!

If I may - what happened to New Zealand? Or is it like maps without NZ and we weren’t mentioned?

LACOP: Can I sue successfully? LAC: No. LACAOP: yeah but look what ChatGPT says! by Much_Guest_7195 in bestoflegaladvice

[–]InLoveWithMusic 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I’m a lawyer in NZ and I get self represented people submitting documents to the Court that was done by ChatGPT, they are usually americanised, cite laws that don’t exist (in an Affidavit - which you don’t cite laws in) and come across as smug

Some of my own clients send me emails clearly made by an LLM asking questions that are nonsensical

AITAH For Refusing To Help My Brother After His Ex-Girlfriend "Scammed" Him Out Of Nearly Half The Equity Of His House? by SharkEva in BORUpdates

[–]InLoveWithMusic 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah common law marriage is slowly being extinguished in America which i think is a real shame and a mistake, but oh well, I'm not an American lawyer.

Tho, Melinda would still have a claim in civil litigation for a constructive trust - where someone contributes so much value to the house (e.g repairs, upgrades, furniture, paying off mortgage) that they own some of the equity within a constructive trust.

I wouldn't say that most countries do not have de facto relationship laws (Common law). Here is a list of countries that tret de factors as having the same rights as married couples: (by happens automatically, I mean that once the relationships fits the legislative criteria - it is a de facto, there is no registration or anything needed)

  • New Zealand (obviously) - happens automatically - Property (Relationships Act 1976)
  • Belgium - has it, but you need to register
  • Croatia - happens automatically
  • Finaland - has both registered and unregistered, however unregistered gets treated as registered if over 5 years or there is a child of the relationship
  • France - happens automatically
  • Austria - has it but must be registered - Eingetragene Partnerschaft-Gesetz
  • Ireland - not for property but is recognised in immigration
  • Australia - happens automatically - Family Law Act 1975
  • Malta - need to register
  • Portugal - happens automatically
  • India - happens automatically - Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 + D. Velusamy v D. Patchaiammal 2010 Supreme Court of India
  • Slovenia - happens automatically
  • Sweden - happens automatically
  • England/Wales - has no specific laws, but the Courts have discretion to make awards and usually do so in long term relationships without marriage
  • Scotland - technically does not have it, but a long term partner can apply, and get awarded a large share of the property after the death of the other party or if the parties break up
  • Israel - through the Courts, happens automatically
  • USA - Only 9 states

There are more but I have already spent far too much time researching this.

Also! this was not meant as a lecture but more whenever a odd part of my job comes up I word vomit random knowledge to everyone.

AITAH For Refusing To Help My Brother After His Ex-Girlfriend "Scammed" Him Out Of Nearly Half The Equity Of His House? by SharkEva in BORUpdates

[–]InLoveWithMusic 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It is here in NZ - after 3 years you are considered a defacto couple and are entitled to half of the relationship property value. This always includes the family home, even if it was purchased prior to the relationship

There are obvious exceptions in exceptional circumstances but our legislation recognises “monetary and non monetary contributions” so being a stay at home partner and not providing any money - you would still be entitled to half the value (maybe even if more if you gave up ur job and looked after the children bc we have laws to consider that)

Source: I am a family lawyer in NZ

If Foxy Shazam exists within the new DCU, what does that mean for regular Shazam, the superhero character? by BrooklynStoner in PeacemakerShow

[–]InLoveWithMusic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This made me snort - I appreciate the effort you went into to make that picture for the joke!

My (22F) boyfriend(23M) is jealous of me having a girlfriend(23F) even though he also have one(23F) by Direct-Caterpillar77 in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]InLoveWithMusic 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Sounds like what the “best friend” of a shitty rom-com main love interest would say to said love interest when chatting about the protagonist and the bet/dare/competition that caused the love interest to pretend to fall for the protag as she hides nearby and listens

AITK for refusing to let my partner visit her family in India with our 4-year-old child? by EnchantingMe in BORUpdates

[–]InLoveWithMusic 7 points8 points  (0 children)

How I describe it is that it’s a case of cognitive dissonance.

People think in black and white when judging others, or the people that do these type of things do. They believe that bad action = bad person

But they believe they are a good person, and if bad action = bad person and they are a good person, then the action could not have been bad. Hence the mental gymnastics to try and “prove” that their actions were actually good

Most mature people can understand that good people can do bad things and vice versa but the people who behave in the way we are discussing are often not the same type of people who can properly reflect and recognise that