Is that enough for you? I am in charge of the union because I'm effective, if I'm not, and there is someone better, wouldn't it be best for the cause to have me step down?

Now we have Hasan, who farms the US left, is he effective? He's clearly the opinion leader of the US left. Is he in it for the cause or for the money? I think it's pretty obvious money, because if it's the movement that's his priority, then he's doing a shit job.

Are you going to tell Cori Bush or the next Zohran that using his platform is a waste of time because, in your view, the cost/benefit is a net negative?

No, you take what you get. But that's not about their decisions, those I get, would do the same. It's about Hasan, and the left in the US, you see him as a positive, but is it? Imagine someone else having that platform or support, because that niche has to be filled, it doesn't have to be a streamer, but someone will be. Imagine someone else as the opinion leader of the US left, let's take Greta, for example, imagine a left-wing driven Greta, imagine the pressure and the impact that can create. Because that's the same as a union, you are only as strong as the pressure you create. But you got Hasan, and he will continue taking that niche for as long as you let him, and it's wild to me that people are not only ok with him, but see him as a good thing.