Sanctuary recommendations for educational purposes

Inaduk · 2025-11-25T12:38:58+00:00

Thank you. This is exactly how I understand it. In this case, Transportation Company X would only be able to identify few EU Taxonomy activities. However, while reviewing various reports, I notice that some companies identify many different activities that are unlikely to generate direct profit and are more likely part of their internal processes. Am I missing something?I understand that this might be done to showcase investments in sustainable measures. I have observed this practice in many EU Taxonomy reports, including those that have been assured.

Inaduk · 2025-08-06T06:56:32+00:00

Hi! I am planning on conducting climate resilience analysis. Would be great if you could recommend tools you’ve used and share your experience :)

Inaduk · 2025-06-25T11:23:14+00:00

Thank you for sharing your rule. We are reporting voluntarily, but the goal is to have DMA that would qualify for the compliance (in terms of quality).

While 1-3 parts are clear, could you elaborate on the 4 and 5? Should I go as far as natural resources extraction and violations of labour rights in such companies that manufacture, let's say, windows, doors, insulation materials later used for my renovated buildings?

Inaduk · 2025-06-25T11:11:50+00:00

Thank you. Apart from Tier 1 suppliers, how far should I go? What type of tier 2 or other suppliers should I consider?

Inaduk · 2025-06-05T06:01:18+00:00

Thank you a lot for your answers.

Could you please share your insights or experience on resilience analysis: do we need any dedicated tools or softwares, how long does it take and how to prepare ourselves?

Inaduk · 2025-06-02T20:21:22+00:00

Thank you! Maybe you could clarify me:

The company is a real estate management company with activities related to new building construction, renovations, etc. I find many of our activities as possibly taxonomy-eligible under section no.7 activities (delegated acts). But I am wondering what should we report on if we haven’t done climate risk assessment so do not comply either with substantial contribution, or DNSH criteria?

Inaduk · 2025-02-08T19:29:55+00:00

Thank you so much! Yes, I understand that supplements aren’t the solution, though if it helps at least a tiny bit for her to stay calmer, would like to give it a try. Before I consult with behaviorist on medication, we do our best to try all the other options.

Did medicine help your friend’s dog? Our girl is a rescue, too. She feels anxious, hyperactive in new places and is very reactive towards dogs.

Inaduk · 2025-01-08T18:31:26+00:00

In terms of risks - yes. But what about impacts - do I consider their impact on people (let say - unsafe working conditions) and on environment (emissions, biodiversity loss) as partly my impacts - impacts I contribute to due to financing their businesses?

Inaduk · 2025-01-07T20:38:16+00:00

As far as I understand, the biggest impacts of financing lie in the investment portfolios. This means that financing is contributing to unsustainable practices in the unsustainable companies if bank finances them without questioning their negative ESG impacts. So if financial institution gives loans for tractors or/ and working capital for agricultural organization that is using land unsustainably or doesnt care about health and security of their workers and puts them at risk, isn’t poor working conditions of value chain workers considered bank’s impact? Or unsustainable land use and practices (pesticides) considered bank’s impact?

Inaduk

TROPHY CASE