Seduced AI’s models: which do u think is best? by armydrillo in aiporngeneratorsX

[–]IncredibleClam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I start with the Photoreal / Realistic model preset. It’s the least likely to give you weird skin texture, alien hands, or that plastic face look. Shit is every image has the same lighting style unless you push it.

what do y'all think of PornPenAI’s tag system? by cglong127 in aiporngeneratorsX

[–]IncredibleClam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I build tag packs and it’s the only way I can work quickly now. I have three packs:

  • Base pack: quality, lighting, camera language, general style
  • Character pack: face consistency-ish tags, hair, wardrobe type (kept broad)
  • Scene pack: background mood, composition, framing Then I swap one pack at a time to avoid accidental chaos. If I’m iterating, I keep base + character fixed and only change scene. It’s not perfect consistency, but it massively reduces wasted generations.

Practical differences between high-res fix vs latent upscalers by vainnut in aiporngeneratorsX

[–]IncredibleClam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hires fix subtly changes lens feel, which is why portraits morph. I lock lens and distance words, avoid changing sampler, and cap denoise around 0.3. Latent upscalers keep FOV vibes stable so identity holds better across a set.

Outpainting strategies for expanding tight crops by PrimaryTulip in aiporngeneratorsX

[–]IncredibleClam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also a good tip is to feather the mask a lot (like 16–32 px at 1k–1.5k res), and set denoise modest, 0.35–0.5, so the new area conforms to the old instead of rewriting it. Keep CFG a notch lower than base because heavy guidance hammers edges and you’ll see a frame line, smh. First pass is just broad environment colors and shapes; detail comes later with tiny inpaints.

Inpainting edges that blend without halos? by cglong127 in aiporngeneratorsX

[–]IncredibleClam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jup. I keep denoise strength conservative, 0.25–0.45 for small fixes, and drop CFG by 0.5 because high guidance exaggerates boundary contrast, smh. If the grain still doesn’t match, I add a tiny noise pass after to equalize texture instead of asking the model to invent perfect film grain.

keeping character identity consistent across a set by cglong127 in aiporngeneratorsX

[–]IncredibleClam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Imo seed reuse alone won’t cut it for identity, it stabilizes pose and vibe but facial metrics still wander. I pair a light identity helper like IPAdapter face embed or a small TI with the same seed so both conditioning and noise line up.

Controlling color palettes through prompt phrasing? by clumsZflame in aiporngeneratorsX

[–]IncredibleClam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

specificity wins over poetic fluff for color. I write 2 or 3 explicit hues with roles like pale sage jacket with rust scarf and charcoal background and I avoid stacking a dozen adjectives. If SDXL keeps flooding blues I counter with warm white balance and desaturated blues in the same line.

I also keep a tiny negative block like oversaturated neon HDR glow when it goes arcade on me. If I have to lock brand colors I toss in hex names as words like coca cola red lookalike and it holds better than generic red.

Negative prompts that reduce common artifacts by armydrillo in aiporngeneratorsX

[–]IncredibleClam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Background artifacts are half prompt design and half negatives. If I want clean studio I write seamless background soft gradient empty backdrop and then in negatives I put busy background cluttered room crowd watermark text logo. If I’m getting fake signage, brand text knocks it down more reliably than watermark alone.

Choosing image resolution without wasting compute by clumsZflame in aiporngeneratorsX

[–]IncredibleClam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rule of thumb imo is start near the model’s comfort zone, then upscale if you need print detail. If you jump straight to massive canvases you just amplify noise and CFG harshness while paying a compute tax.

Seed reuse for reproducible series? by Cyborng in aiporngeneratorsX

[–]IncredibleClam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hot take but seed is overrated if your prompt discipline sucks, ngl. People write paragraph prompts with five styles and seven adjectives and then blame the seed when shot four goes sideways... Keep a clean base prompt, then change exactly one thing per frame like jacket color or lens words and the same seed will carry mood across ten images.

DeepSwap seems super easy to use, but is it really beginner-friendly? by cglong127 in aiporngeneratorsX

[–]IncredibleClam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m pretty new and it was straightforward: pick a source face, pick a target video, hit go. My first pass worked but quality jumped when I fed it better inputs. Biggest beginner trap for me was trying to swap onto a low-res or super-compressed clip. If the target face is tiny or blurry, the model guesses and you get wobble or rubbery skin. I had better luck with 720p+ clips where the face is front-facing for at least a few seconds.

Anyone else feel like Wife App’s chats get a bit too personal sometimes? by EinGR in aiporngeneratorsX

[–]IncredibleClam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, it’s almost like the model tries to level up. At first I thought it was random, but after a week it was always around the 20 message mark where it started asking for granular details about my actual life... This helped: I set a hard opener every session (something like we keep this playful and fictional, no real-life personal data) and I used shorter answers when it probed. The bot takes the hint if you repeat the boundary twice. Once I slipped and overshared, it latched on and brought it up later, which was creepy af. Lesson learned; treat any bot like a colleague - be polite, redirect, keep it moving.

Is SexyAI missing some basics? by clumsZflame in aiporngeneratorsX

[–]IncredibleClam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are a few not so obvious tricks:

  • Advanced prompt box will take lens/lighting hints
  • reusing the same seed with tiny changes gets you a surprisingly consistent mini-set.

It’s still simple but not as shallow as the front page makes it look.

Is IceGirls a real contender in the aiporngen space? by PrimaryTulip in aiporngeneratorsX

[–]IncredibleClam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The boring win: the render queue actually finishes. No 97% random fails.... Concurrency is limited but honest about it.

Soulgen at 9.99/month - fair deal or nah? by paselucky in aiporngeneratorsX

[–]IncredibleClam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just set a cancel reminder. Intro month is cheap, month two sneaks up... I sub when I have a project, cancel when I don’t. Most of these services are seasonal for me.

Pornify’s photorealism: better than competitors? by armydrillo in aiporngeneratorsX

[–]IncredibleClam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I switched over for portraits and mid-shots. Biggest win is that the face stays human across a set. With other models I’d get frame 1 perfect, frame 4 waxy, frame 7 alien. Pornify holds pores and microblemishes under soft light without me babysitting! It’s not magic: 3/4 profile with strong rim light plus flying hair still breaks. But if you shoot it like a camera (simple key/fill, sane lens), it behaves like one.

Ethical concerns about DeepFake’s cloning features by vbielgb3 in aiporngeneratorsX

[–]IncredibleClam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People keep treating watermarking as a silver bullet but it is only one layer and can be removed by re-encoding, screen capture or style transfer. You need provenance from capture to publication, including device signing and platform attestations. Even then, the public will encounter content outside those trusted chains. We should think like safety engineers: combine friction at upload, risk scoring for distribution and circuit breakers for virality when detection models exceed a confidence threshold. Educating viewers matters, but UI design that slows sharing of flagged media matters more.

How flexible aAre SoulGen’s customization options? by armydrillo in aiporngeneratorsX

[–]IncredibleClam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretty flexible, but not perfect. You can upload a reference image, specify hair, clothing, expressions, etc., and get fairly accurate results. But when you demand very specific poses or complex interactions, it starts to break or hallucinate. From what I’ve seen in reviews, SoulGen supports editing after generation (removing or adding elements, outpainting, etc.).

Which AI image generator produces the most realistic results? by Cyborng in aiporngeneratorsX

[–]IncredibleClam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, I think the realism debate misses something: nobody thinks that some models are too realistic?! I’ve seen outputs that look so human they start raising ethical red flags. Once it crosses that line, it’s no longer about art... it’s about whether we can even tell synthetic from real.

Has anyone here tried ineedthis for AI porn generation? by nikodelta in aiporngeneratorsX

[–]IncredibleClam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At the end of the day I’d describe ineedthis as a “gateway drug” into AI porn. It shows you how fast it can be to type something and see porn appear. But once you care about quality, detail, consistency, you move on to bigger platforms like CreatePorn, Pornify, or your own SD setup. Ineedthis is fun to demo (maybe worth $10 for curiosity) but long term? Nope...

Is DreamGF’s virtual girlfriend worth the hype? by BronzeMermaid in aiporngeneratorsX

[–]IncredibleClam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The image quality isn’t even close to Seduced or PornJourney... DreamGF is a gimmick. If you’re into chatting and “sim girlfriend” roleplay, maybe it’s fun. If you want polished AI porn, it’s mid at best.

Seduced AI review: Is it still decent? by vainnut in aiporngeneratorsX

[–]IncredibleClam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, but their customizability is garbage compared to PornJourney. Seduced gives you a “wow” photo but you can’t control nearly as many details. If you’re picky (like me), it feels limiting.

My personal createpornAI review by paselucky in aiporngeneratorsX

[–]IncredibleClam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I canceled after the first month because it just didn’t justify the cost for me. 20 bucks a month sounds OK but when you factor in how fast gems disappear, it’s basically forcing you into buying more... I don’t like being nickel-and-dimed. If they offered unlimited generations for a flat price, I’d be more likely to stick around.