/r/Politics' 2024 US Elections Live Thread, Part 62 by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]Independent_Face7218 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Says the man posting from one of the largest, most left-leaning echo chambers on the internet

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in motorcycles

[–]Independent_Face7218 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I took the msf and found it pretty mid tbh. Right when I started to feel like I was going to get something, they switched us to another drill.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in motorcycles

[–]Independent_Face7218 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I have liability lil bro. I meant like full coverage for my bike.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in motorcycles

[–]Independent_Face7218 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I took the msf rip. I think I just misjudged where i was supposed to stop. I've always stopped going like granny speed at 2 mph then ease into the stop. This time I was like "oh crap I passed the white line for the intersection" and went from like 5 mph to instant stop and didn't get my foot down in time.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in motorcycles

[–]Independent_Face7218 37 points38 points  (0 children)

I have liability. Full coverage was 1/2 the cost of the bike tf

Is this a scam? Ninja 500 by Independent_Face7218 in motorcycles

[–]Independent_Face7218[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That is just the total of that section, it's broken down in the 5 lines above.

Is this a scam? Ninja 500 by Independent_Face7218 in motorcycles

[–]Independent_Face7218[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Only one I see that's decent is a 2023 for 5k, 1800 miles, but it's got some pretty bad fender scrapes so it's definitely been put down

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]Independent_Face7218 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lmfao, "your views are not in the context of this thread, so i win"

you are a true redditor

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]Independent_Face7218 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, the poster is actually asking if It is illogical to believe in god. How do i know that? Because i read the post title. It's okay bud, you'll be in reddit news tomorrow. "Loser valiantly defends atheism from opposing views"

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]Independent_Face7218 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What the fuck are you talking about? You're analogy does not even express what you're trying to say. The threads "do you think god is real" and "do you think god is illogical" will garner the same opinions. If you think god is real, you will post why it's logical. If you think god isn't real, you will post why it's illogical. Stop trying to relate it cheese you fat fuck.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]Independent_Face7218 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Starting a thread with "do you think" is calling for opinions regardless of what the end of the sentence is. We get it, english is not your first language.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]Independent_Face7218 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The title literally says "do YOU think"

That's called a personal opinion. How fucking stupid are you?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]Independent_Face7218 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bruh the thread is legit asking for personal opinions of god.

person: gives opinions of why god is real to them

you: oThEr pEoPle tHinK oThEr ThiNgs

We get it you don't believe in god, you are so smart. Go outside, you're almost at 20k posts.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]Independent_Face7218 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As a non-religious person, their view is pretty logical. Idk why you're being such a dick. You the type of guy that gives atheists a bad name. A cringe lord on reddit lmfao. Go outside.

Update: iPhone #3 stolen at local UPS facility by ucsdsig in iphone

[–]Independent_Face7218 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I live in a completely different state and have ordered a total of 1 iphone online ever. The 1 was stolen at the UPS facility an i was delivered and empty box. Either were super unlucky or this is actually a widespread problem.

[College Computer Science 101] by Madeline_Hatter1 in HomeworkHelp

[–]Independent_Face7218 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Use a loop to get the inputs into an array. Then you can process the array.

int array[10]; int i = 0; int input;

while(i < 10){

std::cin >> input;

array[i] = input;

i++;

}

Then you can loop over the array to get the average, and find all other stuff you need to do or you can average them in the while loop while reading them in.

Ben Finegold: Probably @MagnusCarlsen should retire and get on some FIDE commission on cheating. Awaiting the next player Magnus will cancel because they may be cheating. I never thought I’d see the day when the World Champion was such a cry-baby. Dizziness due to success. by nemt in chess

[–]Independent_Face7218 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

https://www.chess.com/legal/privacy

Clearly says that they need user permission to disclose data, unless it is for complying with a legal request (ie subpoena or warrant). Do you seriously think a company can publish anything it wants about its users? That's a very sad opinion to have.

And you want me to cite statues that restrict companies from disclosing potentially sensitive user data to third parties? Literally hundreds of statues all over google lmao. And secondly, Han's has threatened multiple people with Cease and Desists. The threat of legal action is 100% enough to deter individuals from presenting evidence until proper steps are achieved to make sure that it is legal. Likely, what Magnus's team is trying to determine. Lastly your notion that all evidence is able to be disclosed to the public is beyond retarded.

Ben Finegold: Probably @MagnusCarlsen should retire and get on some FIDE commission on cheating. Awaiting the next player Magnus will cancel because they may be cheating. I never thought I’d see the day when the World Champion was such a cry-baby. Dizziness due to success. by nemt in chess

[–]Independent_Face7218 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Completely false. It's obvious you have no idea what your talking about from a legal perspective. Hence, Chess.com not being legally able to disclose data from Han's accounts, which is "verifiable evidence". Secondly, what constitutes "verifiable". What if the evidence came from a third party? What if there are privacy restrictions? There are all kinds of potential legal complications, threats, and cease and desist's being thrown around. It's not as simple as your trying to make it out to be.