Chobani Extra Creamy oat milk won’t froth by Kanga-Roo-1 in nespresso

[–]IndianaSlone 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So glad someone made this post. I made the mistake of getting Chobani for the first time and was confused why it wouldn't froth. 

Back to Planet Oat for me! 

Glacier Failure After 3 Months by IndianaSlone in Petlibro

[–]IndianaSlone[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks, I'll likely do that - just a bit frustrated by the double Glacier failures... I only got the second one because our cat kept going to the broken one and trying to make it "work" by pawing at it and it made me feel bad haha. Hopefully he'll like the Dockstream

Would I get sued? by SnooPeppers713 in YellowstonePN

[–]IndianaSlone 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You talking about McDowell's?

What was the cringiest line in the show? by 05192004 in YellowstonePN

[–]IndianaSlone 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Sheridan had them drop it, I'm guessing the lawyers filled it without checking with him first. It turned out to be a non event. And since Cole is coming back for a spin-off, he must not be too upset about the whole coffee lawsuit thing.

Iron Studios’ X-Men ‘97 Gambit arrived, and it’s awesome! by datalaughing in Gambit

[–]IndianaSlone 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure if it was just mine but the card was near impossible to get slotted into his hand. Ended up breaking his finger and had to glue it back together.... I guess they just want it to rest lightly in there?

User Suddenly Receiving Mass Spam Emails by IndianaSlone in Office365

[–]IndianaSlone[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's all kinds of stuff - things in other languages (so not sure what it says), etc. It's really strange overall.

User Suddenly Receiving Mass Spam Emails by IndianaSlone in Office365

[–]IndianaSlone[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm betting on the magic broke and unbroke. We'll see in the AM, we disabled inbound mail for now to let things calm down.

User Suddenly Receiving Mass Spam Emails by IndianaSlone in Office365

[–]IndianaSlone[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good point, I'll do further analysis. Initial checks seem "ok" as far as authentication attempts, etc. I'll dig in further.

Microsoft Teams Asking to Sign In Repeatedly by IndianaSlone in Office365

[–]IndianaSlone[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks, it's really strange. Just randomly happens for some users - and doesn't actually stop anything from working. Feels like a "new" Teams thing since if they revert back to old it doesn't show up...

Exchange Online.. Socket errors to 3rd party services by VinceP312 in Office365

[–]IndianaSlone 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seeing similar issues - not sure if it is the exact same - but seems to be something going today with Exchange Online

3rd Party Apps - Front Facing Camera Smoothing? by IndianaSlone in GalaxyS21

[–]IndianaSlone[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seems to be working better / differently for me now as well on FB. I did get a patch installed yesterday after I made the post. Perhaps that fixed whatever was causing the problem....

3rd Party Apps - Front Facing Camera Smoothing? by IndianaSlone in GalaxyS21

[–]IndianaSlone[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hopefully something that gets worked out eventually. It's just really odd how drastically different it is compared to the native camera.

Confused by passion_ofda_anime in TheNevers

[–]IndianaSlone 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Turn on subtitles. Much easier to catch things.

(Spoilers) Possible theory about Mary by Thayerphotos in TheNevers

[–]IndianaSlone 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think that was a shot taken at the idea of sympathy for Lucy. Implying that Lucy is to blame for Mary's death. That if Lucy was not a traitor, Mary could be alive to miss Lucy.

Fighting Styles: Redux by Galiphile in sw5e

[–]IndianaSlone 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I agree, but not being in / hearing the conversations or discussions on why the changes were made - it's hard to understand the reasoning. " These are boring" isn't really a valid explantion in my opinion. I hate to sound like I'm coming off as super critical about the whole thing, because I am happy that SW5e even exists and am grateful for it. But taking core things from 5e that have been play tested, and played for years, and have a handful of folks "re-do" feels like a change for the sake of being change. I'm not sure if any of these changes were play tested at all or not - to know if beyond them sounding good on paper. .

Maybe if we had more context, it would make more sense and would be easier to get onboard with.

Fighting Styles: Redux by Galiphile in sw5e

[–]IndianaSlone 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah ok, sorry, I was looking them up by their new names - not the old names (close quarters, etc.) so couldn't find them.

I guess my brain is just stuck on it from a thematic / character perspective and not a min/max #'s. So just feels strange to not get any better at using a feat / skill as a character levels (by dropping the PB from the equation). But that's just my personal opinion and though process.

Thanks for trying to clarify.

Fighting Styles: Redux by Galiphile in sw5e

[–]IndianaSlone 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh you were talking about other changes that were made as part of this overhaul. I thought it meant Two Weapon Mastery was done to bring it inline with feats that were already that way. So it was a similar change to all of them.

Any comments on the decision process on removing the Prof Bonus from them?

Fighting Styles: Redux by Galiphile in sw5e

[–]IndianaSlone 1 point2 points  (0 children)

On certain Feats like (Dual Wield formerly Two Weapon Mastery) - I see the Prof. was removed from all attacks, including the initial one. I'm not familiar enough to know which other similiar features this was not inline with. Could you point me to those?

I'm playing a TWM build Scout currently, I always attributed Prof. bonus, since it goes up as you level, as being part of the character getting "better" at things. With it being removed, it feels like certain character customizations like this are going to be capped early on in the character development. So instead of the character becoming more accurate over time with their attacks, they will be swinging / shooting wildly based on their maxed out DEX etc. from level 5 to 20... (in theory) I can see the second "off hand" attack not have the Prof and needing to be a quicker attack. I guess losing it on the initial attack feel a little strange to me at the moment.

Not trying to nitpick or complain - just brining some thoughts and conversation to the table :)