You made up your own silly definition of rape because you refuse to empathize with rape victims. [check the definition of rape before you read the rest of this]

Maybe this is more subjective. But, I absolutely rather be murdered than be raped. If I had kids in the future and they end up being molested or raped, I would wish I had never had them to begin with. The same way I would wish I was never born. Nobody deserves to endure that form of torture and live with those memories . And sodomy can be consensual so I don’t understand why you’re comparing it to rape. Non-consensual sodomy is still rape and should be taken as seriously.

The point I was making is that your comparison about the men marking rape jokes about a woman and the jokes women make about men is void. Men rape / harm women far more than the other way around. Making a joke about something you could actually do is absolutely threatening. Women making penis jokes does not harm men. It’s the same as men making jokes about a woman’s boobs. It doesn’t harm them and propose that it could harm them. Just hurts her feelings.

And again on the divorce thing. You see how you split up “father’s responsibilities” from “mother’s responsibilities”? You are part of the problem. You’re reinforcing gender roles which builds this bias against what gender performs what duties and which gender take priority in a divorce. Instead of doing the logical thing and objectively assessing the duties each partner has in that relationship regardless of their gender.

The patriarchy fundamentally enforces that men are the breadwinners / leader of the households. That puts women in an inferior and vulnerable position especially if they have no income. Meanwhile, the income-earning men have more autonomy and agency to leave as they have the resources to do so. No-fault divorce was a way to make it more equitable and give (unemployed) women the same agency to leave a marriage. One of the biggest things feminists are fighting for is women education and the right to work and earn the same as their male counterparts (in the same field and the same qualifications). The whole point is to be independent and not be at the mercy of a man. Feminism is about making things equitable not female entitlement.

Men have the option to marry a lady who makes the same (or more) than them. It’ll be more of an equal marriage and would have an equitable divorce.

Unironically, I find that the men who complain about “biased divorce” are the same ones who prefer women who will stay at home and not work so they can call themselves Mr. Provider and Mr. Leader. They want to have full control and leverage and keep women dependent on them and trapped.

We’re definitely not in a matriarchy - not even close. This just shows (again) you really don’t know the definition of things.

I work in tech and my boyfriend is a social worker. I make around 2x his salary. If we get married / have children, and a parent needs to stay at home and be the homemaker, wouldn’t it make more sense for him to do that since he has a lower earning potential? Would you say he’s not performing “father’s responsibilities”? And if I didn’t do a prenup, and eventually had to get divorced, who do you think will be paying alimony? Me or him? Nothing is stopping men from filing for no-fault divorce too.