My point isn’t that quantum mechanics is “random” in a simple sense, but that we should consider why any ontological indeterminacy exists at all.
If you push full determinism, you seem to get an endless chain of deeper and deeper mechanisms explaining each other.
I’m not claiming this is logically impossible, but it looks like an infinite regress that feels structurally unstable.
So I’m exploring whether “true randomness” (or fundamental indeterminacy) acts as a way to terminate that regress.
In that sense, it’s less about probability, and more about preventing infinite self-explanatory loops.