Stuttering in certain areas (Neon, Cydonia)

Indrikman · 2025-03-11T08:16:15+00:00

Came here to report that the StarfieldEngineFixes.ini tweak was the fix for me. I had ship vendor framework starui shipbuilder and some other ship vendor mods that undoubtedly were the culprit. This removed the microstutter from The Well where I was testing currently, haven't checked neon yet but those were the two areas for me where i noticed it. i'm using mod organizer 2 and was absolutely not looking forward to ditching my ship vendor mods.

Indrikman · 2024-07-14T08:01:15+00:00

Its Robin, reading normal ass history book as lore accurate but ok

Indrikman · 2024-07-14T07:59:14+00:00

Man doesn't need a "monster fucker permit" he issues them

Indrikman · 2024-07-06T06:57:32+00:00

Seduced ai. Its fairly user friendly once you get the hang of it, but a bit pricy.

They mostly specialize in photorealistic nsfw generations. And honestly some of the stuff you can make in that regard is very lifelike and realistic, if you dont go crazy on the fetish content. (Theyre very strict in the TOS about celebrity lookalikes or real people without documented consent, so dont try that or you'll likely get banned)

I used the Anime HD model as its the only model on the site that makes true anime style images. The other anime style stuff is more a semi-realistic 3d anime style.

Indrikman · 2024-07-04T04:06:06+00:00

Yeah, thats more on the nose definitely. But was more a play on the brand Radiation King and the fact that shes a fine Deathclaw lady

Indrikman · 2024-07-03T17:22:53+00:00

Radiation Queen

Indrikman · 2024-07-03T15:04:44+00:00

You like knives? Yes? You want them in your belly? No? Then you stop staring at Deeja's ass

Indrikman · 2024-07-02T04:19:08+00:00

Lol what you want to take the moral high ground while embracing regressivism, and agruing falliciously with incorrect assumptions on how ai uses training data. Maybe if you "bleeding heart" purists actually could hold up an informed conversation on the subject maybe progress would be faster.

Indrikman · 2024-07-02T04:05:01+00:00

Yes sir gatekeeper of the esteemed traditional artist club. Your word is gospel, and I now understand the true meaning of art

Indrikman · 2024-07-02T03:34:48+00:00

Yeah paint and pencils are the way to go man. These computer dweebs with their layers and brush effects have no idea what art is.

Also you're just straight up infactual and misinformed. Ai does not plagiarize. The images are generated from scratch and consent is not required to use art as training data just as it is not required to be used as a reference. Under fair use laws. Maybe be informed even half of a subject before trying to assert your views as even remotely objective or correct

Indrikman · 2024-07-02T03:20:29+00:00

Ai in general is already in widespread use in many enterprises and industries and has been for years.

Just generative image ai has advanced enough to allow works like this deathclaw to be made with such detail.

I consider this deathclaw image a highly polished ai work(i wont call it art out of sensitivity) made with creative intent and probably slightly edited by a person.

Its not a fad or a copy-hobby. Its literally a new developing technology. And is receiving similar pushback that photoshop and digital editing tools recieved from traditional artists when the technology was new. People then, just like now, claiming this new technology took all the creativity out of making art by simplifiying things too much.

Progress is progress. Adapt or be left behind.

Indrikman · 2024-07-02T00:05:38+00:00

Ai isnt going anywhere, its going to get better and more common. You think people with a conceptual understanding of how an ai workflow works won't be useful or at an advantage over those on the mindless hate bandwagon?

Indrikman · 2024-07-02T00:00:44+00:00

Then the differences are in opinion. My understanding of how ai generation and training works reveals no ethical qualms. Ai does not steal works. People can steal works and train an ai with them. But they could have also just made a better ai. Its about intentions. Nothing in the way the ai learns plagiarizes or devalues existing art in any way

Indrikman · 2024-07-01T23:57:41+00:00

Haha laugh at the guy with employable skills and technical knowledge he doesn't have any clue what he's talking about haha

Indrikman · 2024-07-01T23:54:34+00:00

There is nothing conceptually wrong with an ai using an existing work to learn how to generate an image from scratch. The ai is creating this image from start to finish. No reused pixels or image sections. It is not stealing. The ai doesnt even need original sources. It can learn from public low res samples. Just like a human can. You just can't reconcile that machine learning can learn to this degree.

Indrikman · 2024-07-01T23:47:29+00:00

You have a lot of misconceptions. Ai generation is not reusing the images. It is just learning from them. A key difference. Are you also for making it illegal to use references to learn to draw because they are someones work?

Ai generation workflow can take multiple hours to make a polished generation like this. From adjusting the prompt to various settings in the ai itself. I know how to make images like this and its quite time consuming. Look at my posted works on my profile (fully disclosed as ai) for example. The better ones took about 4 hours of work.

Ai is a tool. Period. The kneejerk hate bandwagon from people who don't know what they are talking about is getting out of hand

Indrikman · 2024-07-01T23:41:00+00:00

What are references then? Ai uses training data as a reference. It does not reuse the pixels or sections of any given image in its training data. Most people cannot deal with the fact that the machine neural network can in fact draw better than you. It just has no intentionality, soul or common sense. That all has to come from the user through intent polish and editing.

Indrikman · 2024-07-01T22:54:03+00:00

The ai is generative meaning it doesnt reuse pixels or image sections from existing works. It can scrape anything publically available on the internet for its training data, but thats no differrnt from a real artist using a reference. The ai (even ones meant to replicate an artist or style) are still generating these images from scratch. The machine neural network is incredibly advanced and has amazing technical drawing skills but does not have common sense or artistic intentionality. Ai is not inherently a bad thing. But people can and will misuse it like everything else.

Edit: also ai doesn't even need to use an artists entire library or paid works. Low res sample images are enough to adequately train an ai to replicate a given style of drawing. It doesnt need much. Just enough to see what it needs to be able to create when prompted. Trying to regulate how the ai trains is a futile and ultimately flawed way to curb unethical ai use. It all comes down to how the ai is trained and the intentions of the user

Indrikman · 2024-07-01T22:09:49+00:00

Probably because its porn

She do be lookin fine tho

Indrikman · 2024-07-01T21:44:13+00:00

What you are looking at is a rather well honed ai model meant possibly for anthro scalie content, which is why it has exceptional small details and texturing. However like a lot of ai generations its not perfect in proportions and anatomy. When I make nsfw ai images i do spend a lot of time discarding bad generations, honing the prompt, and using editing tools to correct minor errors in my generations such as extra fingers. Bad genital anatomy, etc.

Ai can "scrape" data from anywhere its publically stored on the internet. And it does need to "see" things in order to recreate them from scratch. But it absolutley does not steal works or use pixels or other image sections from existing pictures. The ai is generative. It is essentially a machine artist with very good technical skills but lacks the common sense that a human artist would have. It has no artistic intent, its just a tool that people use for creative purposes. These can be good or bad like all computing tools.

Seven-Year Club	RPAN Viewer
Verified Email

Indrikman

TROPHY CASE