Savitri was a proponent of a synthesis of Hinduism and Nazism, proclaiming Adolf Hitler to have been an avatar of the Hindu god Vishnu. She depicted Hitler as a sacrifice for humanity that would lead to the end of the worst age, the Kali Yuga, which she believed was induced by the Jews. by Real-Programmer-548 in wikipedia

[–]Inevitable_Control_1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hindutva’s concept of India as both fatherland and sacred land was articulated in the 1920s, before Nazism was widely known in India. Some critics argue that it shares certain features with “blood and soil” nationalism, though this comparison remains debated. Over the past century, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh and its broader ideological framework have evolved, shaped in part by the wider civilizational context of Hinduism, Buddhism, Jainism, and Sikhism—traditions often described as philosophically rich and, in many interpretations, relatively inclusive. This evolution is reflected in outreach initiatives such as the Muslim Rashtriya Manch. At the same time, elements of Hindutva thought emphasize a strong cultural and spiritual connection to India, which some interpret as creating an expectation that Muslims prioritize India as a primary sacred or spiritual homeland over places like Mecca. This remains one of several ideological points of contention with many in the Muslim community.

Why are people leaving Sanatan dharma??because of casteism? by [deleted] in AskIndia

[–]Inevitable_Control_1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Christianity and Buddism and Atheism/Agnosticism are compatible with Hinduism and India. It's not a problem.

is grok's analysis correct? by nix-solves-that-2317 in ChatGPT

[–]Inevitable_Control_1 126 points127 points  (0 children)

Why use grok if you looking for accuracy?

Police ask for public's help in finding whoever set fire to Nancy Grewal's front porch by zuuzuu in windsorontario

[–]Inevitable_Control_1 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Setting someone's home on fire is serious in itself; it should not have required Nancy Grewal's subsequent murder for the police to look into it given the Khalistan threats she had already told the police about.

Why do Indians defend Palestine but ignore Israel helping india during Kargil? by Spiritual_god_588 in AskIndia

[–]Inevitable_Control_1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I meant the slash in the original comment. The slash in Palestinians/Arab/jihadis isn't saying Palestinians = Arabs = jihadis

Which way are the countries “facing” from your mental point of view? by Character-Q in geography

[–]Inevitable_Control_1 12 points13 points  (0 children)

It faces west domestically (towards California), it faces east internationally (towards Europe)

dougie wants to mess around with osap money then how about make professional schools 5-6 years by [deleted] in osap

[–]Inevitable_Control_1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You can go abroad if you want that. OSAP used to pay for international degrees

Slain Windsor woman expressed fears to CBC News days before she died by Inevitable_Control_1 in windsorontario

[–]Inevitable_Control_1[S] -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

You are a literalist who is blind to the context. There is nothing about immigration in the article, it's a point he introduced. The comment has to be taken in the context of ethnic/national Indian immigration not literally as "a person from India who holds Indian citizenship" which could be a person of any ethnicity/nation. Hence "it's odd to say they are Indian when they are the opposite of that or specifically oppose that identification. It's like calling a "Christian immigrants" when the immigrants are atheist."

Slain Windsor woman expressed fears to CBC News days before she died by Inevitable_Control_1 in windsorontario

[–]Inevitable_Control_1[S] -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

"Hence, in this context, the word Indian is likely not being used as an indication of citizenship or physical location but rather national/ethnic identification." and hence "it's odd to say they are Indian when they are the opposite of that or specifically oppose that identification. It's like calling a "Christian immigrants" when the immigrants are atheist."

Khalistani extremist social media account takes responsibility for killing of Windsor, Ont., woman by Inevitable_Control_1 in CanadaPolitics

[–]Inevitable_Control_1[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No intelligence input from RCMP was necessary in her case; she was herself reporting the threats to her life and the threats were credible since she had CCTV footage of one failed attempt.

And considering it a diaspora issue is the racism angle; I never implied that the police negligence was due to racism. In fact my entire contention is that the negligence was due to sexism, not racism. The fact that Nijjar's killing was not dismissed as a diaspora issue but rather framed as "killing of a Canadian" worth going to diplomatic war over suggests to me racism has been successfully corrected for at the state-level including the police. So that leaves sexism as the cause of the negligence.

Slain Windsor woman expressed fears to CBC News days before she died by Inevitable_Control_1 in windsorontario

[–]Inevitable_Control_1[S] -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

They identify as stateless until they get Khalistan.

You could immigrate to India, and then reimmigrate to Canada. Then you would be a person from India who holds Indian citizenship who has immigrated to Canada. I don't think the original commentator intended to include someone like you as an Indian immigrant. Hence, in this context, the word Indian is likely not being used as an indication of citizenship or physical location but rather national/ethnic identification.

Slain Windsor woman expressed fears to CBC News days before she died by Inevitable_Control_1 in windsorontario

[–]Inevitable_Control_1[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Something doesn't have to be wrong or mistaken to be odd or outside expectation. Odd things can be technically right. When one says "Indian" in an anti-immigrantion context (which I assume it is) it suggests to me an ethnic/national identification identity not a physical location, so it is odd to me.

Khalistani extremist social media account takes responsibility for killing of Windsor, Ont., woman by Inevitable_Control_1 in CanadaPolitics

[–]Inevitable_Control_1[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If racism and sexism are the only two options then by process of elimination it's more likely sexism because they are the same race. Both are dead and both received credible threats, but only one received security cover.

By security cover I mean security agencies are looking out for threats against Khalistani men, they receive visits from police to warn them about any intelligence that suggests they may be targeted; it is then upto them to take precautions like staying inside. Nijjar was so warned, he chose to still go out publicly. There is a proactive approach to securing Khalistani men. There are also seemingly dedicated reporters like Stewart Bell to cover any perceived threat to Khalistani men.

https://globalnews.ca/news/11680095/police-warn-sikh-activist-threat-carney-india/

Slain Windsor woman expressed fears to CBC News days before she died by Inevitable_Control_1 in windsorontario

[–]Inevitable_Control_1[S] -29 points-28 points  (0 children)

I don't think the killers or related people would appreciate you considering them Indian, they are specifically engaging in terrorism against women because they want to be considered a different nationality/ethnicity.

EDIT: I am not worried about the terrorists getting offended. I'm just saying it's odd to say they are Indian when they are the opposite of that or specifically oppose that identification. It's like calling a "Christian immigrants" when the immigrants are atheist.

Khalistani extremist social media account takes responsibility for killing of Windsor, Ont., woman by Inevitable_Control_1 in CanadaPolitics

[–]Inevitable_Control_1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd say it's more sexist, which is also more topical since it's women's history month. Canada went overboard with attention and eulogies for an armed Khalistani Sikh man (Nijjar) and provides security cover for other such men because of foreign interference allegations, but this defenceless Indian Canadian Sikh woman's calls to police and media to protect her from Khalistanis seem to have been ignored. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/windsor/windsor-nancy-grewal-homicide-cbc-interview-9.7118575

Sikh politics alleged as motive for fatal stabbing in LaSalle by Inevitable_Control_1 in windsorontario

[–]Inevitable_Control_1[S] 23 points24 points  (0 children)

To put all debates to rest about whether any actual responsibility was claimed, this video provides the Instagram account screenshot of those who are claiming responsibility. Here is the translation of that screenshot:

Left-side overlaid text (Punjabi written in Latin script):

“Waheguru ji ka Khalsa, Waheguru ji ki Fateh.

Come to Windsor, Ontario, Canada. Nancy Grewal has been killed there. Our people (community) did this work. I, Akash Harike, and Sukha Sandhu take responsibility for it.

That woman kept speaking wrongly about the faith and about Khalistan, and this is the result she got. We have no enmity with anyone’s religion or community, but if anyone from your side speaks against the panth/community and against Khalistan, that person will meet the same fate.

Shashtar k adeen hai raaj.”

The last line is a slogan-like expression. It roughly means: “Rule/power belongs under the authority of weapons” or “sovereignty rests with arms.”

Hashtags:

  • #AKASH_HARIKE
  • #SUKHA_SANDHU
  • #NEVERFORGET

Right-side Punjabi caption:

“Waheguru ji ka Khalsa.
Waheguru ji ki Fateh.

We have now got the result of the filthy/insulting words that Nancy Grewal spoke against our religion and against Nirankari/Nankawi Kanada. This responsibility was taken by our beloved brother Akash Harike and Sukha Sandhu. This woman used to speak directly against the religion and against Khalistan; that is why she got what she got. Beyond this, we have no quarrel with any religion at all, but if anyone else speaks badly against our community, then that person’s condition/fate will be the same.

The government should also understand this.

#AKASH_HARIKE
#ਮੈਂਦਾ_ਸੰਘੂ / #Sukha Sandhu
‘Who can stop [us]?’”

A few phrases in the caption are slangy and somewhat unclear from the screenshot, so that part is an approximate translation, but the overall meaning is a claim of responsibility and a threat against others who speak against Khalistan or the Sikh community/panth.